Abstract
Imagine, if you can, that workers at CERN have begun talking to dead people, thanks to the LHC. This is the plot of Franklin Clermont’s novel The Voices at CERN. Shannon Fields, the fictional CERN senior press relations coordinator, is tasked with speaking to the concerned wife of one of the technicians. Shannon’s superiors reason that she is qualified for this task because her job entails explaining “each new discovery to the waiting news organizations that felt compelled to deliver news in 30 second sound bites only and language pegged at an eighth grade reading level or lower” [1] as well as talking to the general public about black hole fears and “that destroy-the-world stuff” [2]. Shannon is understandably concerned about the ramifications to their public image (especially on safety issues) if the employees’ claims becomes public, imagining the resulting “lurid American tabloid headlines: ‘CERN: I Hear Dead People’” [3]. While this example is clearly outlandish, the fictional headline is an excellent parody of reality. However, studies suggest that it is not the tabloids that Shannon and her real-world counterpart have to be concerned about, but rather the Internet, especially in the United States [4]. The fact-checking website Snopes.com has had to debunk several curious Internet claims about CERN, perhaps the most bizarre being a video purporting to show a ritual human sacrifice conducted on the grounds of the facility [5]. In reality it was a prank conducted without the knowledge or permission of CERN and those responsible were held accountable [6]. However, the damage has already been done, as the video is still easily found online.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This excellent source should be on the desktop (literal or virtual) of anyone engaging in science communication.
- 2.
The numerous hoaxed papers published in peer-reviewed humanities journals demonstrate that the problem of distinguishing jargon from gibberish is not unique to science.
- 3.
Most are housed at http://www.geon.us/
- 4.
References
F. Clermont, The Voices at CERN (CreateSpace, 2014), pp. 8–9
F. Clermont, The Voices at CERN (CreateSpace, 2014), p. 6
F. Clermont, The Voices at CERN (CreateSpace, 2014), p. 12
National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators 2018 (National Science Foundation, Alexandria, 2018), p. 7.28
K. LaCapria, Was a Human Sacrifice Captured at CERN?, Snopes, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/human-sacrifice-captured-at-cern/
CERN Answers Queries from Social Media, CERN, https://home.cern/resources/faqs/cern-answers-queries-social-media
J. Cook, S. Lewandowsky, The Debunking Handbook, version 2 (University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 2012), pp. 1–3
J. Cook, S. Lewandowsky, The Debunking Handbook, version 2 (University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 2012), p. 4
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2017), p. 64
FAQ: LHC the Guide Education, CERN, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2255762/files/CERN-Brochure-2017-002-Eng.pdf
A. Kusenko, Viewpoint: Are We on the Brink of the Higgs Abyss? Physics 8 (2015). https://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/108
A. Helbing, T. Helbing (script), The Race of His Life, The Flash, season 2 (2016)
J. Glassner, D. Levinson (script), Immaterial Girl, The Invisible Man, season 2 (2001)
C. Funk, L. Rainie, Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society, Pew Research Center, http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/
National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators 2018 (National Science Foundation, Alexandria, 2018), p. 7.44
M. Goodman, R. Finnegan, L. Mohadjer, T. Krenzke, J. Hogan, Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments Among U.S. Adults: Results from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies 2012: First Look (U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2013), p. 20
M. Goodman, R. Finnegan, L. Mohadjer, T. Krenzke, J. Hogan, Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments Among U.S. Adults: Results from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies 2012: First Look (U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2013), p. B-7
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2017), p. 39
J. Carpenter (dir.), Prince of Darkness, Universal Pictures (1987)
R.C. Cumbow, Order in the Universe: The Films of John Carpenter (Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, 1990), p. 190
D. Carey-Hill (dir.), Futurama: Bender’s Game, Twentieth Century Fox (2008)
B.M. Terhal, M.M. Wolf, A.C. Doherty, Quantum Entanglement: A Modern Perspective. Phys. Today 56(4), 46–52 (2003)
J. Markoff, Sorry, Einstein. Quantum Study Suggests ‘Spooky Action’ Is Real, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/science/quantum-theory-experiment-said-to-prove-spooky-interactions.html
N. Lambert, Y.-N. Chen, Y.-C. Cheng, C.-M. Li, G.-Y. Chen, F. Nori, Quantum Biology. Nat. Phys. 9, 10–18 (2013)
T. Krantz (dir.), The Big Bang, Anchor Bay (2011)
A. Castro, 10 Theories on What Caused the Flash Forward in Flashforward, Syfy Wire, https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/theories_on_what_caused_t
B. Carr, Is There Space for PSI in Modern Physics?, https://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/psi/carr2003.html
B.D. Josephson, String Theory, Universal Mind, and the Paranormal, ArXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0312012
M. Durrani, Physicists Probe the Paranormal, Physics World, https://physicsworld.com/a/physicists-probe-the-paranormal/
R. Ruyle, The String Theory, a Physical Trace of the Psychical World, in Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Academy of Religious and Psychical Research (Academy of Religion and Psychical Research, Bloomfield, 2004), p. 20
G.G. Sparks, C.L. Nelson, R.G. Campbell, The Relationship Between Exposure to Televised Messages About Paranormal Phenomena and Paranormal Beliefs, J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 41(3), 345–359 (1997); G.G. Sparks, T. Hansen, R. Shah, Do Televised Depictions of Paranormal Events Influence Viewers’ Paranormal Beliefs? Skept. Inq. 18, 386–95 (1994)
G. Benford, Cosm (Orbit, London, 1998), p. 271
G. Benford, Timescape (Bantam Books, New York, 1980), p. 235
H. Bromley-Davenport (dir.), Xtro II, North American Pictures (1990)
J.M.M. Baldwin, The Collider (Smashwords, 2012)
K. Larsen, This I Believe Understand: The Importance of Banning the B-Word from Science. Astron. Educ. Rev. 6(2), 118–126 (2008)
S.J. Gould, Rocks of Ages (Ballantine, New York, 1999), pp. 5–6
M. Trodden, Our First Guest Blogger—Lawrence Krauss, Cosmic Variance., http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/11/14/our-first-guest-blogger-lawrence-krauss/
G. Taubes, Nobel Dreams (Tempus Books, Redmond, 1986), pp. xvi–xvii
D. Brown, Angels & Demons (Pocket Books, New York, 2000), p. 31
D. Brown, Angels & Demons (Pocket Books, New York, 2000), p. 88
F. Lee, Why We Can’t See God, http://www.web-books.com/GoodPost/Articles/SeeGod.htm
G. Ellis, Piety in the Sky. Nature 371, 115 (1994)
L. Krauss, In Trying to Provide Evidence for Christian Beliefs, a Respectable Physicist Has Bent Science to its Breaking Point. New Sci. 194, 53 (2007)
A. Brennert (script), Dark Matters, The Outer Limits, season 1 (1995)
L. Lederman, The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer What is the Question?, rev. edn. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1993), p. 22
Frequently Asked Questions, Angels & Demons: The Science Behind the Story, https://angelsanddemons.web.cern.ch/faq
Affidavit of Luis Sancho, La Hora Cero, http://lahoracero.org/wpcontent/uploads/2008/09/adnfil20080402_0016.pdf
M.J. Wood, K.M. Douglas, R.M. Sutton, Dead and Alive: Belief in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3(6), 772 (2012)
CERN Design Guidelines: The Logo, CERN, https://design-guidelines.web.cern.ch/logo-0
B. Palma, Clouds Over Geneva Show CERN Opening a Portal to a New Dimension?, Snopes, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/clouds-over-geneva-show-cern-opening-a-portal-to-a-new-dimension/
The Official Website of Zecharia Sitchin, http://www.sitchin.com/; M.S. Heiser, Sitchin is Wrong, https://www.sitchiniswrong.com/nibiru/nibiru.htm
A. Chitwood, Lorenzo di Bonaventura Talks David S. Goyer’s THE BREACH; Says It Involves an Accident with the Large Hadron Collider, Collider, http://collider.com/the-breach-movie-story-details-lorenzo-di-bonaventura/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsen, K. (2019). Can You Hear Me Now? Impediments to Science Communication. In: Particle Panic! . Science and Fiction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12206-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12206-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12205-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12206-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)