Skip to main content

Can You Hear Me Now? Impediments to Science Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Particle Panic!

Part of the book series: Science and Fiction ((SCIFICT))

  • 575 Accesses

Abstract

Imagine, if you can, that workers at CERN have begun talking to dead people, thanks to the LHC. This is the plot of Franklin Clermont’s novel The Voices at CERN. Shannon Fields, the fictional CERN senior press relations coordinator, is tasked with speaking to the concerned wife of one of the technicians. Shannon’s superiors reason that she is qualified for this task because her job entails explaining “each new discovery to the waiting news organizations that felt compelled to deliver news in 30 second sound bites only and language pegged at an eighth grade reading level or lower” [1] as well as talking to the general public about black hole fears and “that destroy-the-world stuff” [2]. Shannon is understandably concerned about the ramifications to their public image (especially on safety issues) if the employees’ claims becomes public, imagining the resulting “lurid American tabloid headlines: ‘CERN: I Hear Dead People’” [3]. While this example is clearly outlandish, the fictional headline is an excellent parody of reality. However, studies suggest that it is not the tabloids that Shannon and her real-world counterpart have to be concerned about, but rather the Internet, especially in the United States [4]. The fact-checking website Snopes.com has had to debunk several curious Internet claims about CERN, perhaps the most bizarre being a video purporting to show a ritual human sacrifice conducted on the grounds of the facility [5]. In reality it was a prank conducted without the knowledge or permission of CERN and those responsible were held accountable [6]. However, the damage has already been done, as the video is still easily found online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This excellent source should be on the desktop (literal or virtual) of anyone engaging in science communication.

  2. 2.

    The numerous hoaxed papers published in peer-reviewed humanities journals demonstrate that the problem of distinguishing jargon from gibberish is not unique to science.

  3. 3.

    Most are housed at http://www.geon.us/

  4. 4.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ugASLblNk4

References

  1. F. Clermont, The Voices at CERN (CreateSpace, 2014), pp. 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Clermont, The Voices at CERN (CreateSpace, 2014), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Clermont, The Voices at CERN (CreateSpace, 2014), p. 12

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators 2018 (National Science Foundation, Alexandria, 2018), p. 7.28

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. LaCapria, Was a Human Sacrifice Captured at CERN?, Snopes, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/human-sacrifice-captured-at-cern/

  6. CERN Answers Queries from Social Media, CERN, https://home.cern/resources/faqs/cern-answers-queries-social-media

  7. J. Cook, S. Lewandowsky, The Debunking Handbook, version 2 (University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 2012), pp. 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Cook, S. Lewandowsky, The Debunking Handbook, version 2 (University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 2012), p. 4

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2017), p. 64

    Google Scholar 

  10. FAQ: LHC the Guide Education, CERN, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2255762/files/CERN-Brochure-2017-002-Eng.pdf

  11. A. Kusenko, Viewpoint: Are We on the Brink of the Higgs Abyss? Physics 8 (2015). https://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/108

  12. A. Helbing, T. Helbing (script), The Race of His Life, The Flash, season 2 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Glassner, D. Levinson (script), Immaterial Girl, The Invisible Man, season 2 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Funk, L. Rainie, Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society, Pew Research Center, http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/

  15. National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators 2018 (National Science Foundation, Alexandria, 2018), p. 7.44

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Goodman, R. Finnegan, L. Mohadjer, T. Krenzke, J. Hogan, Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments Among U.S. Adults: Results from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies 2012: First Look (U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2013), p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Goodman, R. Finnegan, L. Mohadjer, T. Krenzke, J. Hogan, Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments Among U.S. Adults: Results from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies 2012: First Look (U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2013), p. B-7

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2017), p. 39

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Carpenter (dir.), Prince of Darkness, Universal Pictures (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.C. Cumbow, Order in the Universe: The Films of John Carpenter (Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, 1990), p. 190

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Carey-Hill (dir.), Futurama: Bender’s Game, Twentieth Century Fox (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. B.M. Terhal, M.M. Wolf, A.C. Doherty, Quantum Entanglement: A Modern Perspective. Phys. Today 56(4), 46–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Markoff, Sorry, Einstein. Quantum Study Suggests ‘Spooky Action’ Is Real, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/science/quantum-theory-experiment-said-to-prove-spooky-interactions.html

  24. N. Lambert, Y.-N. Chen, Y.-C. Cheng, C.-M. Li, G.-Y. Chen, F. Nori, Quantum Biology. Nat. Phys. 9, 10–18 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Krantz (dir.), The Big Bang, Anchor Bay (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Castro, 10 Theories on What Caused the Flash Forward in Flashforward, Syfy Wire, https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/theories_on_what_caused_t

  27. B. Carr, Is There Space for PSI in Modern Physics?, https://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/psi/carr2003.html

  28. B.D. Josephson, String Theory, Universal Mind, and the Paranormal, ArXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0312012

  29. M. Durrani, Physicists Probe the Paranormal, Physics World, https://physicsworld.com/a/physicists-probe-the-paranormal/

  30. R. Ruyle, The String Theory, a Physical Trace of the Psychical World, in Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Academy of Religious and Psychical Research (Academy of Religion and Psychical Research, Bloomfield, 2004), p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  31. G.G. Sparks, C.L. Nelson, R.G. Campbell, The Relationship Between Exposure to Televised Messages About Paranormal Phenomena and Paranormal Beliefs, J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 41(3), 345–359 (1997); G.G. Sparks, T. Hansen, R. Shah, Do Televised Depictions of Paranormal Events Influence Viewers’ Paranormal Beliefs? Skept. Inq. 18, 386–95 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Benford, Cosm (Orbit, London, 1998), p. 271

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Benford, Timescape (Bantam Books, New York, 1980), p. 235

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. Bromley-Davenport (dir.), Xtro II, North American Pictures (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.M.M. Baldwin, The Collider (Smashwords, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. Larsen, This I Believe Understand: The Importance of Banning the B-Word from Science. Astron. Educ. Rev. 6(2), 118–126 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. S.J. Gould, Rocks of Ages (Ballantine, New York, 1999), pp. 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Trodden, Our First Guest Blogger—Lawrence Krauss, Cosmic Variance., http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/11/14/our-first-guest-blogger-lawrence-krauss/

  39. G. Taubes, Nobel Dreams (Tempus Books, Redmond, 1986), pp. xvi–xvii

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. Brown, Angels & Demons (Pocket Books, New York, 2000), p. 31

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. Brown, Angels & Demons (Pocket Books, New York, 2000), p. 88

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. Lee, Why We Can’t See God, http://www.web-books.com/GoodPost/Articles/SeeGod.htm

  43. G. Ellis, Piety in the Sky. Nature 371, 115 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. L. Krauss, In Trying to Provide Evidence for Christian Beliefs, a Respectable Physicist Has Bent Science to its Breaking Point. New Sci. 194, 53 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. A. Brennert (script), Dark Matters, The Outer Limits, season 1 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  46. L. Lederman, The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer What is the Question?, rev. edn. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1993), p. 22

    Google Scholar 

  47. Frequently Asked Questions, Angels & Demons: The Science Behind the Story, https://angelsanddemons.web.cern.ch/faq

  48. Affidavit of Luis Sancho, La Hora Cero, http://lahoracero.org/wpcontent/uploads/2008/09/adnfil20080402_0016.pdf

  49. M.J. Wood, K.M. Douglas, R.M. Sutton, Dead and Alive: Belief in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3(6), 772 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. CERN Design Guidelines: The Logo, CERN, https://design-guidelines.web.cern.ch/logo-0

  51. B. Palma, Clouds Over Geneva Show CERN Opening a Portal to a New Dimension?, Snopes, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/clouds-over-geneva-show-cern-opening-a-portal-to-a-new-dimension/

  52. The Official Website of Zecharia Sitchin, http://www.sitchin.com/; M.S. Heiser, Sitchin is Wrong, https://www.sitchiniswrong.com/nibiru/nibiru.htm

  53. A. Chitwood, Lorenzo di Bonaventura Talks David S. Goyer’s THE BREACH; Says It Involves an Accident with the Large Hadron Collider, Collider, http://collider.com/the-breach-movie-story-details-lorenzo-di-bonaventura/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Larsen, K. (2019). Can You Hear Me Now? Impediments to Science Communication. In: Particle Panic! . Science and Fiction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12206-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics