Skip to main content

Analysing Security Threats for Cyber-Physical Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information and Communication (FICC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 70))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1529 Accesses

Abstract

Cyber-physical systems have established as an essential part of the modern world and will grow in amount and complexity in the future. In the beginning, this paper provides an overview of CPS architecture, where we describe basic components at three different OSI reference model layers that includes: the human machine interface (application layer), supervisory control and data acquisition (network layer) and programmable logic controllers (physical layer). Since the physical layer enables direct contact to human beings, security is an important factor in the development process. Nonetheless, cyber-physical systems become more and more complicated and offer a wide surface of vulnerabilities which can be exploited through external threats. Since attacks can be launched at every single layer, a wide area of different threats can be inherited and need to be avoided by appropriate security measures. The main contribution of this paper is to provide a security threat tool, where we determine threats and vulnerabilities in cyber-physical systems at the application, the network and the physical layer. Furthermore, the tool is able to suggest solutions which can prevent attacks against those identified threats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rehman, S., Gruhn, V.: Security requirements engineering (SRE) framework for cyber-physical systems (CPS): SRE for CPS. In: New Trends in Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference SoMeT_17, vol 297, p. 153. IOS Press, Sept 2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rehman, S., Gruhn, V.: Recommended architecture for car parking management system based on cyber-physical system. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS), pp. 1–6. IEEE, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rehman, S., Gruhn, V.: An effective security requirements engineering framework for cyber-physical systems. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. (Special Issue Cyber-Phys. Syst. Data Process. Commun. Architect.) 6(3). ISSN: 2227-7080; ESCI-WoS index (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Todd, M., Koster, S.R., Wong, P.C.M.: Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP, 2016. System and method for securing a network from zero-day vulnerability exploits. U.S. Patent 9,264,441

    Google Scholar 

  5. Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., Luo, B.: Cyber-physical systems security—a survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 1–1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zimmermann, J.D.: OS1 reference model—the IS0 model of architecture for open systems interconnection

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stallings, W., Brown, L.: Computer Security: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn. Pearson, Boston (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stallings, W.: Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice, 7th edn. Pearson, Boston (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greensmith, J., Aickelin, U.: Firewalls, intrusion detection systems and anti-virus scanners (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steiner, J.G., Neuman, B.C., Schiller, J.I.: Kerberos: an authentication service for open network systems. In: USENIX Winter (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Omar, S.: Information system security threats and vulnerabilities: evaluating the human factor in data protection. Doctoral dissertation (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalloniatis, C., Mouratidis, H., Vassilis, M., Islam, S., Gritzalis, S., Kavakli, E.: Towards the design of secure and privacy-oriented information systems in the cloud: identifying the major concepts. Computer Stand. Interfaces 36(4), 759–775 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wells, L.J., Camelio, J.A., Williams, C.B., White, J.: Cyber-physical security challenges in manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2(2), 74–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, L., Törngren, M., Onori, M.: Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 37, 517–527 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abomhara, M.: Cyber security and the internet of things: vulnerabilities, threats, intruders and attacks. J. Cyber Secur. Mobil. 4(1), 65–88 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papp, D., Ma, Z., Buttyan, L.: Embedded systems security: threats, vulnerabilities, and attack taxonomy. In: 13th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), pp. 145–152. IEEE, July 2015

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kornecki, A.J., Subramanian, N., Zalewski, J.: Studying interrelationships of safety and security for software assurance in cyber-physical systems: approach based on bayesian belief networks. In 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 1393–1399. IEEE, Sept 2013

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mo, Y., Kim, T.H.J., Brancik, K., Dickinson, D., Lee, H., Perrig, A., Sinopoli, B.: Cyber–physical security of a smart grid infrastructure. Proc. IEEE 100(1), 195–209 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kushner, D.: The real story of Stuxnet. IEEE spectrum: technology, engineering, and science news, 26-Feb-2013. Available: https://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/security/the-real-story-of-stuxnet. Accessed 15 Nov 2017

  20. Karnouskos, S.: Stuxnet worm impact on industrial cyber-physical system security. In IECON 2011-37th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 4490–4494. IEEE, Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Slay, J., Miller, M.: Lessons learned from the Maroochy water breach. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 73–82 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu, B., Joseph, A., Sastry, S.: A taxonomy of cyber-attacks on SCADA systems. In: Internet of things (iThings/CPSCom), 2011 International Conference on and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, pp. 380–388. IEEE, Oct 2011

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., Zorzi, M.: Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things J 1(1), 22–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the European Community through project CPS.HUB NRW, EFRE Nr. 0-4000-17.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shafiq ur Rehman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shafiq ur Rehman, De Ceglia, M., Gruhn, V. (2020). Analysing Security Threats for Cyber-Physical Systems. In: Arai, K., Bhatia, R. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 70. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12385-7_74

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics