Abstract
The chapter discusses the issue of robots enchanting humans, particularly the phenomenon of robots being perceived by humans as “magical” enough to develop intimate relationships with them. To examine this problem, this chapter explores the current debates in the field of robot ethics that address sex robots and care robots. It investigates both the arguments of those who are enthusiastic about such robots as well as the positions of skeptics, who consider intimate relationships with robots to be a serious danger. Finally, in reference to sociological studies about transformations of intimacy it is argued that robots enchant humans and are perceived as potential intimate partners because humans are becoming progressively disenchanted in the sense that they are increasingly considered to be non-unique and problematic, while robots are seen as possessing all positive characteristics of humans without any flaws typical of humans.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, K. (2018, January 8). Dating Apps Closed After AI Sexbot Scam. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-42609353. Accessed 23 February 2018.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). London: Sage.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The Normal Chaos of Love (M. Ritter & J. Wiebel, Trans.). Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Bendel, O. (2015). Surgical, Therapeutic, Nursing and Sex Robots in Machine and Information Ethics. In S. P. van Rysewyk & M. Pontier (Eds.), Machine Medical Ethics (pp. 17–32). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_2.
Boellstorff, T. (2010). Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Borenstein, J., & Arkin, R. C. (2016). Robots, Ethics, and Intimacy: The Need for Scientific Research. In Proceedings of Conference of the International Association of Computing and Philosophy (IACAP 2016). https://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/RobotsEthicsIntimacy-IACAP.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2017.
Borenstein, J., & Pearson, Y. (2010). Robot Caregivers: Harbingers of Expanded Freedom for All? Ethics and Information Technology, 12(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9236-4.
Borenstein, J., & Pearson, Y. (2011). Robot Caregivers: Ethical Issues Across the Human Lifespan. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics (pp. 251–265). Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Borenstein, J., & Pearson, Y. (2013). Companion Robots and the Emotional Development of Children. Law, Innovation and Technology, 5(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.5235/17579961.5.2.172.
Bryson, J. J. (2010). Robots Should Be Slaves. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues (pp. 63–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bryson, J. J., & Kime, P. P. (2011). Just an Artifact: Why Machines Are Perceived as Moral Agents. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1641–1646). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
Burr-Miller, A., & Aoki, E. (2013). Becoming (Hetero) Sexual? The Hetero-Spectacle of Idollators and their Real Dolls. Sexuality and Culture, 17(3), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9187-0.
Calo, R. (2011). Robots and Privacy. In P. Lin, G. A. Bekey, & K. Abney (Eds.), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics (pp. 187–201). Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Choi, C. Q. (2008). Not Tonight, Dear, I Have to Reboot. Scientific American, 298(3), 94–97.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2010). Health Care, Capabilities, and AI Assistive Technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9186-2.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Are Emotional Robots Deceptive? IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(4), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.1109/t-affc.2011.29.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2015). Artificial Agents, Good Care, and Modernity. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 36(4), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-015-9331-y.
Culbertson, A. (2017, June 30). Sex Robot Boom: Japanese Men Ditch ‘Complex Women’ for Sex Robots Who Don’t Argue. https://www.express.co.uk/pictures/pics/6688/Love-doll-love-hotel-Japan-pictures. Accessed 14 March 2018.
Danaher, J. (2017). Robotic Rape and Robotic Child Sexual Abuse: Should They Be Criminalised? Criminal Law and Philosophy, 11(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9362-x.
Danaher, J., Earp, B. D., & Sandberg, A. (2017). Should We Campaign Against Sex Robots? In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications (pp. 47–72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Decker, M. (2012). Service Robots in the Mirror of Reflective Research. Poiesis & Praxis, 9(3–4), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0111-8.
de Graaf, M. M. (2016). An Ethical Evaluation of Human-Robot Relationships. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(4), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0368-5.
de Sio, F. S., & van Wynsberghe, A. (2016). When Should We Use Care Robots? The Nature-of-Activities Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(6), 1745–1760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9715-4.
Dépelteau, F. (2013). What Is the Direction of the “Relational Turn”? In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing Relational Sociology (pp. 163–185). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Devlin, K. (2018). Turned On: Science, Sex and Robots. New York: Bloomsbury.
Enz, S., Diruf, M., Spielhagen, C., Zoll, C., & Vargas, P. A. (2011). The Social Role of Robots in the Future—Explorative Measurement of Hopes and Fears. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(3), 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0111-8.
Evans, D. (2010). Wanting the Impossible: The Dilemma at the Heart of Intimate Human-Robot Relationships. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Natural Language Processing (pp. 75–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3), 143–166.
Gerdes, A. (2016). The Issue of Moral Consideration in Robot Ethics. Computers & Society, 45(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874278.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot Rights. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Gutiu, S. (2012, April). Sex Robots and Roboticization of Consent. Paper Presented at the We Robot 2012 Conference, Coral Gables, Florida. http://robots.law.miami.edu/wp-content/2012/01/Gutiu-Roboticization_of_Consent.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2016.
Harvey, C. (2015). Sex Robots and Solipsism: Towards a Culture of Empty Contact. Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 22(2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.5840/pcw201522216.
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416950.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The Outsourced Self: Intimate Life in Market Times. New York: Picador.
Hochschild, A. R., & Ehrenreich, B. (Eds.). (2013). Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Holt, N. (2007). Guys and Dolls [TV Documentary]. A North One Television.
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Illouz, E. (2012). Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Klimczyk, W. (2008). Erotyzm ponowoczesny. Kraków: Universitas.
Langton, R. (2009). Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laue, C. (2017). Familiar and Strange: Gender, Sex, and Love in the Uncanny Valley. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1010002.
Levy, D. (2007a). Love + Sex with Robots : The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. New York: Harper Perennial.
Levy, D. (2007b, April 10–14). Robot Prostitutes as Alternatives to Human Sex Workers. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2007), Workshop on Roboethics, Rome, Italy.
Levy, D. (2009). The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0022-6.
MacKenzie, R. (2014). Sexbots: Replacements for Sex Workers? Ethical Constraints on the Design of Sentient Beings for Utilitarian Purposes. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2693787.2693789.
Mahnic, N. (2017, February 3). Sex Robot Advocacy & the Marriage of Racial Thinking & Corporate Personhood. https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/2017/02/03/sex-robot-advocacy-the-marriage-of-racial-thinking-corporate-personhood-by-nika-mahnic/. Accessed 7 December 2018.
McArthur, N. (2014). Guiltless Pleasures of the Lonely Human Being the Moral and Legal Implications of Sex with Robots. https://www.academia.edu/6977772/The_Moral_and_Legal_Implications_of_Sex_with_Robots. Accessed 18 October 2016.
McNair, B. (2012). Porno? Chic!: How Pornography Changed the World and Made It a Better Place. Abington and New York: Routledge.
Melson, G. F. (2010). Child Development Robots: Social Forces, Children’s Perspectives. Interaction Studies, 11(2), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.2.08mel.
Misselhorn, C., Pompe, U., & Stapleton, M. (2013). Ethical Considerations Regarding the Use of Social Robots in the Fourth Age. GeroPsych. The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000088.
Musiał, M. (2013). Intimacy and Modernity. Modernization of Love in the Western Culture. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia, 7(1), 157–168.
Musiał, M. (2015). Intymność i jej współczesne przemiany. Studium z filozofii kultury. Kraków: Universitas.
Musiał, M. (2018). Loving Dolls and Robots: From Freedom to Objectification, from Solipsism to Autism? In J. T. Grider & M. McDonough (Eds.), Exploring Erotic Encounters: The Inescapable Entanglement of Tradition, Transcendence and Transgression. Leiden: Brill Rodopi.
Nevett, J. (2018, February 1). Paris Sex Doll Brothel Opens Despite Law BANNING Prostitution in France. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/678805/paris-sex-doll-brothel-france-xdolls-prostitution-banned-law-news. Accessed 14 March 2018.
Parks, J. A. (2010). Lifting the Burden of Women’s Care Work: Should Robots Replace the “Human Touch”? Hypatia, 25(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01086.x.
Pearson, Y., & Borenstein, J. (2013). The Intervention of Robot Caregivers and the Cultivation of Children’s Capability to Play. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9309-8.
Pearson, Y., & Borenstein, J. (2014). Creating “Companions” for Children: The Ethics of Designing Esthetic Features for Robots. AI & Society, 29(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0431-1.
Pfadenhauer, M., & Dukat, C. (2015). Robot Caregiver or Robot-Supported Caregiving? International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(3), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0284-0.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, K. (2015). An Anthropology of Robots and AI: Annihilation Anxiety and Machines. New York: Routledge.
Richardson, K. (2016a). Property Relations—Is Property a Person? Extending the Rights of Property Owners Through the Rights of Robotic Machines. In Proceedings of Machine Ethics and Machine Law Workshop (pp. 40–41). http://maschinenethik.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/PROCEEDINGS_MEML_2016.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2017.
Richardson, K. (2016b). Sex Robot Matters: Slavery, the Prostituted, and the Rights of Machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2016.2554421.
Richardson, K. (2016c). The Asymmetrical “Relationship”: Parallels Between Prostitution and the Development of Sex Robots. Computers & Society, 45(3), 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874281.
Richardson, K. (2016d). The Robot Intermediary: Mechanical Analogies and Autism. Anthropology Today, 32(5), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12298.
Richardson, K. (2018). Challenging Sociality: An Anthropology of Robots, Autism, and Attachment. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Richardson, K., & Gildea, F. (2017, May 5). Sex Robots—Why We Should Be Concerned. http://spsc.pt/index.php/2017/05/05/sex-robots-why-we-should-be-concerned/. Accessed 8 December 2018.
Robertson, J. (2010). Gendering Robots: Robo-Sexism in Japan. Body & Society, 16(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x10364767.
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R. T., & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic Assistants in Therapy and Education of Children with Autism: Can a Small Humanoid Robot Help Encourage Social Interaction Skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0116-3.
Sandel, M. J. (2012). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sandry, E. (2015). Robots and Communication. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scassellati, B. (2007). How Social Robots Will Help Us to Diagnose, Treat, and Understand Autism. In Robotics Research (pp. 552–563). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48113-3_47.
Scheutz, M. (2011). The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds Between Humans and Social Robots. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. Bekey (Eds.), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics (pp. 205–222). Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Scheutz, M., & Arnold, T. (2016). Are We Ready for Sex Robots? In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 351–358). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and Human Dignity: A Consideration of the Effects of Robot Care on the Dignity of Older People. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5.
Sharkey, A. (2016). Should We Welcome Robot Teachers? Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z.
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2011). The Rights and Wrongs of Robot Care. In P. Lin, G. A. Bekey, & K. Abney (Ed.), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics (pp. 267–282). Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6.
Sharkey, A., & Wood, N. (2014). The Paro Seal Robot: Demeaning or Enabling. In Proceedings of AISB 2014—50th Annual Convention of the AISB. http://doc.gold.ac.uk/aisb50/AISB50-S17/AISB50-S17-Sharkey-Paper.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2016.
Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2006). Artificial Intelligence and Natural Magic. Artificial Intelligence Review, 25(1–2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9048-z.
Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2010a). Living with Robots: Ethical Tradeoffs in Eldercare. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Natural Language Processing (pp. 245–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2010b). The Crying Shame of Robot Nannies: An Ethical Appraisal. Interaction Studies, 11(2), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.2.01sha.
Sorell, T., & Draper, H. (2014). Robot Carers, Ethics, and Older People. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9344-7.
Sparrow, R. (2002). The March of the Robot Dogs. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021386708994.
Sparrow, R. (2016). Robots in Aged Care: A Dystopian Future? AI & Society, 31(4), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0625-4.
Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the Hands of Machines? The Future of Aged Care. Minds and Machines, 16(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6.
Stahl, B. C., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Ethics of Healthcare Robotics: Towards Responsible Research and Innovation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 86, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.018.
Sullins, J. P. (2012). Robots, Love, and Sex: The Ethics of Building a Love Machine. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(4), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/t-affc.2012.31.
Truitt, E. E. (2015). Medieval Robots: Mechanism, Magic, Nature, and Art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Turkle, S. (2012). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press.
Vallor, S. (2011). Carebots and Caregivers: Sustaining the Ethical Ideal of Care in the Twenty-First Century. Philosophy & Technology, 24(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0015-x.
van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6.
Weeks, J. (2007). The World We Have Won: The Remaking of Erotic and Intimate Life. London and New York: Routledge.
Whitby, B. (2008). Sometimes It’s Hard to Be a Robot: A Call for Action on the Ethics of Abusing Artificial Agents. Interacting with Computers, 20(3), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.002.
Whitby, B. (2010). Oversold, Unregulated, and Unethical: Why We Need to Respond to Robot Nannies. Interaction Studies, 11(2), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.2.18whi.
Whitby, B. (2011). Do You Want a Robot Lover? In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics (pp. 233–249). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yeoman, I., & Mars, M. (2012). Robots, Men and Sex Tourism. Futures, 44(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.11.004.
YouGov. (2013). Omnibus Poll. http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/toplinesbrobots.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Musiał, M. (2019). Robots Enchanting Humans. In: Enchanting Robots. Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12579-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12579-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12578-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12579-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)