Abstract
The Fokker-Planck model of psychotherapy can be developed in one or two dimensions. We put forward minimal models for both cases. In the one-dimensional minimal model, we formalize how the therapist can influence client states. We use the slaving principle of synergetics, which claims that slow variables entrain (i.e., “enslave”) the behavior of the quick variables during pattern formation. Applied to therapist and client, this means that the therapist should be “slow,” i.e., have long relaxation times. This is consistent with findings of psychotherapy research suggesting that resilient, stable, and nonjudgmental therapists are actually more effective. In our model, therapist personality has an essential impact of client states. Preferably, the therapist should not be overly influenced by random events, and the coupling of the client to the therapist should be higher than vice versa. The two-dimensional minimal model allows modeling the therapist-client relationship by a limit cycle, i.e., a periodic attractor. This model dispenses with the slaving principle and allows for both oscillations and synchronized phase-shifted coupling of therapist and client behavior, thus linking the theoretical model with empirical findings on interactional synchrony. Synchrony research often applies cross-correlational methods, and we give a short summary of this research. The phase shift of the minimal model can be related to the empirically found cross-correlations. We conclude the structural-mathematical modeling of the process of psychotherapy by a two-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: Existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4, 191–202.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Coutinho, J., Oliveira-Silva, P., Fernandes, E., Goncalves, O., Correia, D., Perrone McGovern, K., & Tschacher, W. (2018). Psychophysiological synchrony during verbal interaction in romantic relationships. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12371
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Grammer, K., Honda, R., Schmitt, A., & Jütte, A. (1999). Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 487–508.
Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics — An introduction. Nonequilibrium phase-transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Jirsa, V. K., Stacey, W. C., Quilichini, P. P., Ivanov, A. I., & Bernard, C. (2014). On the nature of seizure dynamics. Brain, 137, 2210–2230.
Karvonen, A., Kykyri, V.-L., Kaartinen, J., Penttonen, M., & Seikkula, J. (2016). Sympathetic nervous system synchrony in couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 383–395.
Koole, S. L., & Tschacher, W. (2016). Synchrony in psychotherapy: A review and an integrative framework for the therapeutic alliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 77(862). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00862
Kupper, Z., Ramseyer, F., Hoffmann, H., & Tschacher, W. (2015). Nonverbal synchrony in social interactions of patients with schizophrenia indicates socio-communicative deficits. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0145882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145882.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic non-periodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130–141.
Lutz, W., & Barkham, M. (2015). Therapist effects. In R. L. Cautin & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology (pp. 1–6). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York, NY: Freeman.
Orlinsky, D. E., Grawe, K., & Parks, K. B. (1994). Process and outcome in psychotherapy – Noch einmal. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 270–376). New York, NY: Wiley.
Paulick, J., Deisenhofer, A.-K., Ramseyer, F., Tschacher, W., Rubel, J., & Lutz, W. (2018). Nonverbal Synchrony: A new approach to understand psychotherapeutic processes and drop-out. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 28, 367–384.
Pereira, J.-A., Barkham, M., Kellett, S., & Saxon, D. (2017). The role of practitioner resilience and mindfulness in effective practice: A practice-based feasibility study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44, 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0747-0
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body-movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 284–295.
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2016). Movement coordination in psychotherapy: Synchrony of hand movements is associated with session outcome. A single-case study. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 20, 145–166.
Reich, C. M., Berman, J. S., Dale, R., & Levitt, H. M. (2014). Vocal synchrony in psychotherapy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33, 481–494.
Rössler, O. (1976). An equation for continuous chaos. Physics Letters, 57A, 397–398.
Salvatore, S., & Tschacher, W. (2012). Time dependency of psychotherapeutic exchanges: The contribution of the theory of dynamic systems in analyzing process. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(253). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00253
Tschacher, W. (1997). Prozessgestalten. Die Anwendung der Selbstorganisationstheorie und der Theorie dynamischer Systeme auf Probleme der Psychologie. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Tschacher, W., & Ramseyer, F. (2009). Modeling psychotherapy process by time-series panel analysis (TSPA). Psychotherapy Research, 19, 469–481.
Tschacher, W., Ramseyer, F., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Sharing the now in the social present: Duration of nonverbal synchrony is linked with personality. Journal of Personality, 86, 129–138.
Tschacher, W., Rees, G. M., & Ramseyer, F. (2014). Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1323). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01323
Walther, S., Ramseyer, F., Horn, H., Strik, W., & Tschacher, W. (2014). Less structured movement patterns predict severity of positive syndrome, excitement, and disorganization. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40, 585–591.
Zhang, Y., Meng, T., Hou, Y., Pan, Y., & Hu, Y. (2018). Interpersonal brain synchronization associated with working alliance during psychological counseling. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 282, 103–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tschacher, W., Haken, H. (2019). The One- and Two-Dimensional Fokker-Planck Equation. In: The Process of Psychotherapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12748-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12748-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12747-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12748-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)