Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological and Theoretical Frameworks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Australia and France’s Mutual Empowerment

Part of the book series: Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations ((SID))

  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

This study of the development of the French–Australian bilateral partnership is based on a methodology combining a close reading analysis of primary textual documents and expert interviews. These documents are understood through a theoretical lens encompassing “smart power”, postmodern constructivism and interpretive theories. This research is conducted equally following empirical and theoretical approaches. Postmodern constructivist theories provide the book with relevant readings of the topic’s global issues, such as Joseph Nye’s definition of smart power strategies, while interpretive theories frame the analysis of the actors’ representations and arguments. However, these theories have some limitations that oblige the researcher to conduct his research not only with a theoretical framework but also by using empirical methods. The first methodological step of this research required a systematic analysis of archives. More than a year has been dedicated to the investigation of the following primary sources: archives, official statements, newspapers, other academic and journalistic commentary and surveys of public opinion. The second step of the research has required fifteen interviews of some the main actors of the French–Australian bilateral relationship in the last ten years. As it reflects the research questions framing this research, the relevant literature encompasses academic studies published in both English and French. However, it must be noted that French academic research pertaining to Australian diplomacy is characterised by its rarity. The same assessment can be made regarding Australian publications on French politics. In fact, such studies are noticeably limited, and consequently one of the core aims of this study has been to fill this lack of information in France and in Australia about both countries’ diplomatic actions since the end of the Cold War, focusing especially on the processes that have led to the constitution of the current French–Australian partnership. These diverse sources, combined with a review of relevant literature, have enabled an analysis in depth, and with originality, of the most important issues concerning the evolutions of the French–Australian relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, R 1994, France and the South Pacific Since 1940, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alomes, S & Provis, M 1998, French Worlds—Pacific Worlds, French Nuclear Testing in Australia’s Backyard, Two Rivers Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althaus, C, Bridgman, P & Davis, G 2013, The Australian Policy Handbook, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argounès, F 2006, Géopolitique de l’Australie, Complexe, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argounès, F 2011, ‘L’Australie, entre puissance moyenne et puissance régionale : une analyse réaliste néoclassique’, Thesis (Ph.D.), Université Bordeaux 4, Bordeaux, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argounès, F 2012, ‘L’Australie: la tentation de la puissance régionale’, Pouvoirs, vol. 2, no. 141, pp. 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldino, D 2005, ‘Australia and the World’, in C Aulich & R Wettenhall (eds), Howard’s Second and Third Governments, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldino, D, Carr, A & Langlois, AJ 2014, Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D & Richelson, JT 1985, The Ties That Bind, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beazley, K 2003, ‘The Hawke Years: Foreign Affairs and Defence’, in S Ryan & T Bramston (eds), The Hawke Government, a Critical Retrospective, Pluto Press, Melbourne, pp. 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M 2003, ‘Australia’s Relationship with the United States: The Case for Greater Independence’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M 2008, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific, ASEAN, APEC, and Beyond, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M & Hameiri, S 2017, Navigating the New International Disorder, Australia in World Affairs, 2011–2015, Oxford Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M 1995, Histoire de l’Australie, de 1770 à nos jours, naissance d’une nation du Pacifique, L’Harmattan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M & Rhodes, R 2012, ‘Interpretivism and the Analysis of Traditions and Practices’, Critical Policy Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blainey, G 1983, The Tyranny of Distance, Sun Books, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boniface, P 1995, ‘Dissuasion et non-prolifération : un équilibre difficile, nécessaire mais rompu’, Politique étrangère, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 707–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boniface, P 1998, La France est-elle encore une grande puissance? Presses de Sciences Po, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, J 2005, Fear, a cultural History, Virago, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozo, F 2012, La politique étrangère de la France depuis 1945, Flammarion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broinowski, A 2003, Howard’s War, Scribe, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broinowski, A 2007, Allied and Addicted, Scribe, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P 2013, ‘Negotiating Postcolonial Identities in the Shadow of the EU: New Caledonia’, in R Adler-Nissen & UP Gad (eds), European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories, Routledge, London, pp. 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A & Robert, C 2010, ‘Foreign Policy’, in C Aulich & M Evans (eds), The Rudd Government, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, D 1999, ‘The Noumea Accord: Decolonisation Without Independence in New Caledonia?’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J 1998, ‘The Constructivist Turns in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 324–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y 2007, ‘L’importance de l’Union européenne dans les territoires français du Pacifique’, in Pouvoir(s) et politique(s) en Océanie, actes du XIXe colloque CORAIL, L’Harmattan, Paris, pp. 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissions des Affaires étrangères de l’Assemblée nationale 1995, Rapport d’information sur les réactions internationales à la reprise par la France des essais nucléaires, Assemblée nationale française, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissions des Affaires étrangères, de la Défense et des Forces armées du Senat français 1997, ‘L’Australie et la Nouvelle-Zélande, têtes de pont de la présence française dans la région Asie-Pacifique?’, Rapport d’information no. 290, Sénat français, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissions des Affaires étrangères du Sénat français 2017, ‘Australie : le rôle de la France dans le nouveau monde’, Rapport d’information no. 222, Sénat français, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordonnier, I 1995, La France dans le Pacifique sud: approche géostratégique, Publisud, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson, B & M-T 1993, Mururoa, notre bombe coloniale: histoire de la colonisation nucléaire de la Polynésie française, L’Harmattan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, D 1995, ‘La France et le monde: inventaire après essais’, Études, vol. 383, no. 6, pp. 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis Cross, MK 2011, ‘Europe, a Smart Power?’, International Politics, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 691–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montbrial, T & Gomart, T 2017, Notre intérêt national, quelle politique étrangère pour la France? Odile Jacob, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derville, G 1996, ‘Quand la machine médiatique s’emballe’, Communication et langages, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K 1968, The Analysis of International Relations, Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downer, A 2000, ‘Australia’s Global Agenda, Speech to French Institute of International Affairs’, 31 January, viewed 1 August 2017, http://foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/2000/000131_aust_global_agenda.html.

  • Downer, A 2001, ‘Australian Foreign Policy, a Liberal Perspective’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downer, A 2005, ‘Securing Australia’s Interests: Australian Foreign Policy Priorities’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Canberra, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J-F 2006, La France dans la nouvelle économie mondiale, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G & Grant, B 1995, Australia’s Foreign Relations, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A 2007, ‘From Belief to Argument: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis’, British Journal of Politic and International Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 545–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, S 2011, Australia in International Politics, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D 2013, France in the South Pacific: Power and Politics, Australian National University Press, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, G 2015, ‘Recapturing the Spirit of 1971: Toward a New Regional Political Settlement in the Pacific’, SSGM Discussion Paper, vol. 3, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garran, R 2004, True Believer, John Howard, George Bush & the American Alliance, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand, C 1997, ‘La diplomatie nucléaire du Président Chirac’, Relations internationales et stratégiques, no. 25, pp. 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyngell, A 2017, Fear of Abandonment, Black Inc., Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P & Haas, E 2002, ‘Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions’, Millennium, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 573–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningham, S 1992, France and the South Pacific: A Contemporary History, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningham, S 1996, ‘Testing Times: France’s Underground Nuclear Tests and Its Relations with Asia-Pacific’, Modern and Contemporary France, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningham, S 2017, ‘The Limits of Influence: Australia and the Future of New Caledonia, 1975 to 1988’, The Journal of Pacific History, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 482–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, U 2013, ‘French Concepts of State: Nation, patrie, and the Overseas’, in R Adler-Nissen & UP Gad (eds), European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories, Routledge, London, pp. 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynek, N & Teti, A 2010, ‘Saving Identity from Postmodernism? The Normalisation of Constructivism in International Relations’, Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 171–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P 1994, The End of Certainty, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T 1979, ‘Metaphor in Science’, in A Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langmore, J 2005, Dealing with America: The UN, the US and Australia, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langmore, J 2013, ‘Australia’s Campaign for Security Council Membership’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Quintrec, G 1998, La France dans le monde depuis 1945, Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclellan, N 2014a, ‘François Hollande Says France Wants to Remain a Pacific Power: Is It Wishful Thinking?’, The Guardian, 18 November, viewed 1 August 2017, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/nov/18/francois-hollande-says-france-wants-to-remain-a-pacific-power-is-it-wishful-thinking.

  • Maclellan, N 2014b, ‘The Complicated Politics of a French Defence Treaty’, The Crickey, 19 November, viewed August 2017, https://www.crikey.com.au/2014/11/19/the-complicated-politics-of-a-french-defence-treaty/.

  • Maclellan, N 2015, ‘Transforming the Regional Architecture: New Players and Challenges for the Pacific Islands’, Asia Pacific Issues, no. 118, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclellan, N & Chesnaux, J 1998, La France dans le Pacifique, de Bougainville à Mururoa, La Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallatrait, C 2009, La France, puissance inattendue au XXIe siècle dans le Pacifique sud : éléments pour une approche géopolitique de l’Océanie, L’Harmattan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, R 2004, The Howard Years, Black Inc. Agenda, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, I & Ravenhill, J 1998, ‘Australian Attitudes Towards Closer Engagement with Asia’, The Pacific Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, W 1992, ‘European Loyalist and Polynesian Political Dissent in New Caledonia: The Other Challenge to RPCR Orthodoxy’, Pacific Studies, vol. 15, no. 3. pp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, D 2009, Australian Foreign Relations, Entering the 21st Century, Pearson, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed-Gaillard, S 2010a, ‘Les relations franco-australiennes en Océanie: représentations croisées de deux politiques régionales’, Outre-mers, vol. 97, no. 366, pp. 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed-Gaillard, S 2010b, L’archipel de la puissance? La politique de la France dans le Pacifique Sud de 1946 à 1998, Peter Lang, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokaddem, H 2005, Kanaky et/ou Nouvelle-Calédonie, Expressions, Marseille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P 2016, ‘EU–Australia Relations: A Strategic Partnership in All but Name’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P & Benvenuti, A 2014, ‘EU–Australia Relations at Fifty: Reassessing a Troubled Relationship’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 431–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P, Warleigh-Lack, A & He, B 2014, ‘Awkward States and Regional Organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia Compared’, Comparative European Politics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nossal, KR & Vivian, C 1997, A Brief Madness: Australia and the Resumption of French Nuclear Testing, Australian National University Press, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, JS 2011, The Future of Power, Public Affairs, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, C 2002, ‘A Case for Pragmatism and Self-Reflection in Australia’s Asia Thinking and Engagement’, Australia in the Asian Century White Paper, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquet, M 2000, Cold War in Warm Waters: Reflections on Australian and French Mutual Misunderstandings in the Pacific, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquet, M 2004, Australie plurielle, L’Harmattan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirine, B 2013, ‘Will the EU and the Euro Lead to More Sovereignty? French Polynesia’, in R Adler-Nissen & UP Gad (eds), European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories, Routledge, London, pp. 152–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, X 1988, Le géant du Pacifique, Economic, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, X 2000, L’Australie, entre Occident et Orient, La Documentation française, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnendra, J 2006, ‘Japan-Australia Security Ties and the United States: The Evolution of the Trilateral Dialogue Process and Its Challenges’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 521–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenhill, J & Cotton, J 2007, Trading on Alliance Security, Australia in the World Affairs, 2001–2005, Oxford Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R 1996, Pathways to Asia, The Politics of Engagement, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J 1998, ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 855–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S 2011, ‘Sociology, Globalization, and the Re-shaping of the National’, Theory Talk #43, 6 September, viewed 17 July 2017, http://www.theory-talks.org/2011/09/theory-talk-43.html.

  • Swedberg, R & Agevall, O 2005, The Max Weber Dictionary, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synder, CA 1998, ‘Australia’s Pursuit of Regional Security into the 21st Century’, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, S 2004, ‘Regionalism and Changing Regional Order in the Pacific Islands’, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Védrine, H 2001, France in an Age of Globalisation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D 1999, Anxious Nation: Australia and the Rise of Asia 1850–1939, The University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A 1992, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A 1999, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A 2003, ‘Why a State World Is Inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 491–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, M 2007, The Howard Paradox, Australian Diplomacy in Asia, 1996–2006, Australia Broadcast Corporation, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, M & Warren, T 2000, ‘Wild Colonial Ploys? Currents of Thought in Australian Foreign Policy’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, NJ 2013, ‘Investigation Diplomatic Transformations’, International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, NJ & Booth, K 2008, The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H 2010, ‘Power Shift: Australia’s Future Between Washington and Beijing’, Quaterly Essay, vol. 39, pp. 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmaier, W 2004, ‘Theory as a Factor and the Theorist as an Actor: The “Pragmatist Constructivist” Lessons of John Dewey and John Kenneth Galbraith’, International Studies Review, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 427–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, EJ 2008, ‘Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power’, The Annals of the American Academic of Political and Social Sciences, vol. 616, pp. 110–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfers, A 1962, Discord and Collaboration, Essays on International Politics, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Paul Soyez

Authors
  1. Paul Soyez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soyez, P. (2019). Methodological and Theoretical Frameworks. In: Australia and France’s Mutual Empowerment. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13449-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation