Skip to main content
  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

Implementation of the memorandum policies has increased social inequalities, imposed material deprivation on a large proportion of the population, greatly reduced wages and pensions, worsened employment conditions, spurred unemployment, downgraded healthcare conditions, reduced population and increased immigration. But there was also a category of very wealthy people who have seen their wealth increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Taxation of income has grown as a percentage of GDP from 8.4% in 2009 to 10.3% in 2016 and total tax revenue risen from 32.5% to 41.2%. This is attributable to the abolition of many exemptions and concessions that were previously part of the taxation process for natural persons, to the increase in taxes on property ownership and the increase in the coefficients for indirect taxation. The result of all this would be that in 2014 the total tax burden as a proportion of gross income for a couple with two children where only one parent works would be at 28.7% (compared to 22.2% for EU21, 20.1% for the OECD) (Kaplanoglu 2017: 71).

  2. 2.

    Which means that these people have to live from less than 12.63 EUR per day (if living alone) or survive on less than 6.62 EUR per day and person (for a household composed of 2 adults and 2 children below 14 years of age).

  3. 3.

    In other words, they have to survive on less than 8.42 EUR per day (for a single household) or on less than 4.42 EUR per day and person for a family household with 2 adults and 2 children.

  4. 4.

    Material deprivation—proportion of people facing serious economic difficulties with the result that they lack least four basic items from the total of nine: (a) difficulties in meeting regular expenses such as rent or instalments on loan repayments, regular bills (electricity, water, natural gas, credit card payments or instalments on household appliance, and so on; (b) financial inability to pay for one week’s holiday; (c) financial inability to purchase food including chicken, meat, fish or vegetables of equivalent nutritive value every other day; (d) financial inability to face unexpected but necessary expenses to the sum of around €384; (e) financial inability to afford a telephone (including a mobile phone); (f) financial inability to afford a colour television; (g) financial inability to afford a washing machine; (h) financial inability to afford a private car and (i) financial inability to afford adequate heating.

  5. 5.

    Resulting in a 62.5% reduction in monthly consumption of heating oil in the 2008–2013.

  6. 6.

    It is largely attributable to this that Greece has currently the highest rate of housing cost overburden in the European Union with increased steeply from 18.1% (2010) to 40.7% (2014).

  7. 7.

    The 2010 figure was 28.2% but for the figure of €584.

  8. 8.

    The “fakelaki” is a particularly widespread practice in Greece, and involves the patient giving an extra sum (in a small envelope—fakelaki in Greek) to a doctor in a public hospital to ensure that treatment is made available more promptly.

References

  • Burgi N., 2017, “Le démantèlement méthodique et tragique des institutions grecques de santé publique”, La Revue De l’ IRES vol. 91–92, pp. 77–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambakis E., 2017, “How much has the crisis affected the situation of Greek households?”, Financial Bulletin of the Bank of Greece vol. 45, pp. 37–54 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannitsis T. and S. Zografakis, 2018, Crisis management in Greece , IMK Studies 58-2018, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.

  • Hellenic Statistical Authority, 2010, Research study on income and living conditions in households for the year 2010, Athens (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellenic Statistical Authority, 2016, Research study on income and living conditions in households for the year 2016, Αthens (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ιnstitute of Labour—Greek General Confederation of Labour, 2012, The Greek economy and employment. Annual report 2012, Athens: Institute of Labour—Greek General Confederation of Labour (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Labour—Greek General Confederation of Labour, 2016, The Greek economy and employment. Annual report 2016, Athens: Institute of Labour—Greek General Confederation of Labour (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Labour—Greek General Confederation of Labour, 2017, The Greek economy and employment. Annual report 2017, Athens: Institute of Labour—Greek General Confederation of Labour (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis G. and C. Pierros, 2015, A proposal for 10% reduction in the rate of unemployment within three years, Athens: Institute of Labour—Greek General Confederation of Labour (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplanoglu G., 2017, “Is it true that Greeks are overtaxed?”, in Katsikas D., K. Filinis and M. Anastasatou (eds.) Understanding the Greek crisis. Answers to crucial questions on the state, the economy and Europe, Athens: Papazisis, pp. 59–78 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzis G., 2016, “The crisis and the memoranda flatten labour”, Social Policy vol. 6, pp. 7–20 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrianidis L., 2015, Outward migration from Greece during the crisis. Final report, http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/research/hellenicObservatory/CMS%20pdf/Research/NBG_2014_-Research_Call/LOIS%20LAMBRANIIDIS_Outward%20migration%20from%20Greece%20during%20the%20crisis%20.pdf, accessed on 7/3/2018.

  • Leventi C. and M. Matsaganis, 2016, Estimating the distributional impact of the Greek crisis (2009–2014), OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1312, OECD Publishing, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrakos T., 2018, “Economic inequalities, poverty and social exclusion: international experience and the case of Greece in the recent crisis”, Social Policy vol. 9, pp. 7–24 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Papatheodorou C. and S. Papanastasiou/Unicef, 2017, The situation of children in Greece 2017: children of the crisis, Athens: Unicef (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wealth Report, 2017, “The global perspective on prime property and investment”, KnightFrank.com/WealthReport, accessed on 25/2/2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wealth X., 2014, World ultra wealth report 2013–2014, http://www.worldwealthreport.com, accessed on 10/4/2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sakellaropoulos, S. (2019). The Social Impact of the Crisis. In: Greece’s (un) Competitive Capitalism and the Economic Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14319-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14319-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14318-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14319-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics