Abstract
This chapter explores, and critiques, two ways in which experts are ignored. It is based upon an investigation of climate change experts in Australia, and Australian debates about renewable energy. First, this chapter argues, experts are constructed as icons of instrumental reason rather than socially situated actors like the rest of us. In such accounts we find experts constructed as tending toward dogmatism, authoritarianism, and an inability to be reflexive about their underlying practices and roles. Second, it argues that expertise is constructed as a danger to democracy that must be corralled into being nothing more than a servant to democracy. Such accounts trade too heavily on the tensions between authority relations and deliberative ideals. Based upon political responses to an electrical supply blackout in Australia in 2016, this chapter suggests the salience of delegation and disempowering tropes for understanding expertise can contribute to political institutions displaying callous disregard for technical advice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AEMO. 2017. Australian Electricity Market Operator. Black System South Australia 28 September 2016. Final Report, March 28. AEMO Limited. Accessed June 10, 2017. http://www.aemo.com.au/Media-Centre/AEMO-publishes-final-report-into-the-South-Australian-state-wide-power-outage.
ANSTO. 2009. Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization. The Nuclear Option as Part of a Diverse Energy Mix. Submission to Energy White Paper. Accessed April 10, 2018. http://www.ansto.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/42385/ANSTO_Submission_to_Energy_White_Paper.pdf.
———. 2014. Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization. Paterson, A., M. Ho & G. Storr, New to Nuclear Countries: Considerations for Adoption of Small Modular Reactors – A Guide to Future Adopters. Conference Paper Presented to the 19th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Vancouver, Canada, August 24–28, 2014. Accessed April 10, 2018. http://www.nuclearaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/PBNC2014-Paterson-et-al.-paper.pdf.
ATSE. 2013. Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. Nuclear Energy for Australia? Conference Report. Accessed April 10, 2018. https://www.atse.org.au/atse/content/publications/reports/energy/nuclear-energy-australia.aspx.
———. 2014. Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. Nuclear Energy Is an Option. Accessed April 10, 2018. https://www.atse.org.au/atse/content/publications/policy/nuclear-energy-is-an-option.aspx.
Campbell, Brian. 1985. Uncertainty as Symbolic Action in Disputes Among Experts. Social Studies of Science 15 (3): 429–453.
Collins, Harry M., and Robert Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 2017. Why Democracies Need Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Collins, Harry M., and Steven Yearley. 1992. Epistemological Chicken. In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. Andy Pickering, 301–326. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Durant, Darrin. 2008. Accounting for Expertise: Wynne and the Autonomy of the Lay Public Actor. Public Understanding of Science 17 (1): 5–20.
———. 2011. Models of Democracy in Social Studies of Science. Social Studies of Science 41 (5): 691–714.
———. 2016. The Undead Linear Model of Expertise. In Political Legitimacy, Science and Social Authority: Knowledge and Action in Liberal Democracies, ed. M. Heazle and J. Kane, 17–37. London: Routledge.
———. 2018. Servant or Partner? The Role of Expertise and Knowledge in Democracy. The Conversation, March 9. https://theconversation.com/servant-or-partner-the-role-of-expertise-and-knowledge-in-democracy-92026.
Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Farrell, Paul. 2016. South Australia Weather: 80,000 People Still Without Power in Adelaide. The Guardian, September 29. Accessed June 10, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/sep/29/south-australia-storms-frydenberg-adelaide-renewable-energy-weatherill.
Fischer, Frank. 2009. Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hess, David J. 2016. Undone Science: Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchens, Gareth. 2017. Turnbull Ignored Advice That Renewable Energy Not to Blame for SA Blackouts. The Guardian, February 13. Accessed July 20, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/feb/13/turnbull-ignored-advice-that-renewable-energy-not-to-blame-for-sa-blackouts.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2003. (No?) Accounting for Expertise. Science and Public Policy 30 (3): 157–162.
———. 2008. “Speaking Honestly to Power.” Review of The Honest Broker, by Roger Pielke, Jr. American Scientist 3 (96): 240–243.
Judis, John B. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York: Columbia Global Reports.
Kleinman, Daniel L., and Abby Kinchy. 2003. Why Ban Bovine Growth Hormone? Science, Social Welfare, and the Divergent Biotech Policy Landscape in Europe and the United States. Science as Culture 12 (3): 375–414.
Lucas, Adam. 2017. Confected Conflict in the Wake of the South Australian Blackout: Diversionary Strategies and Policy Failure in Australia’s Energy Sector. Energy Research & Social Science 29 (July): 149–159.
Moore, Alfred. 2017. Critical Elitism: Deliberation, Democracy and the Problem of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, Cas, and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2017. What Is Populism? London: Penguin Books.
Pels, Dick. 2003. Unhastening Science: Autonomy and Reflexivity in the Social Theory of Knowledge. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Readfearn, Graham. 2017. Climate Change Authority Loses Last Climate Scientist. The Guardian, July 5. Accessed May 5, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet-oz/2017/jul/05/climate-change-authority-loses-last-climate-scientist.
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2000. Science and Environmental Policy: An Excess of Objectivity. In Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community, ed. R. Frodeman, 79–89. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
———. 2016. Saving Science. New Atlantis 49 (Spring/Summer): 5–40.
Schneider, Mycal, and Antony Froggatt. 2017. The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2017. Accessed April 10, 2017. https://www.worldnuclearreport.org/.
Searle, John R. 1980. Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417–457.
Sovacool, Benjamin K., and M.V. Ramana. 2015. Back to the Future: Small Modular Reactors, Nuclear Fantasies, and Symbolic Convergence. Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (1): 96–125.
Turner, Stephen. 2003. Liberal Democracy 3.0: Civil Society in an Age of Experts. London: SAGE.
Wynne, Brian. 1992. Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science. Public Understanding of Science 1 (3): 281–304.
———. 1993. Public Uptake of Science: A Case for Institutional Reflexivity. Public Understanding of Science 2 (4): 321–337.
———. 2003. Seasick on the Third Wave: Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism. Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 401–417.
———. 2006. Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music. Community Genetics 9 (3): 211–220.
———. 2014. Further Disorientation in the Hall of Mirrors. Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 60–70.
———. 2016. Ghosts in the Machine: Publics, Meanings and a Social Science in a Time of Expert Dogma in Denial. In Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Public, ed. Jason Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes, 99–120. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Durant, D. (2019). Ignoring Experts. In: Caudill, D.S., Conley, S.N., Gorman, M.E., Weinel, M. (eds) The Third Wave in Science and Technology Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14335-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14335-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14334-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14335-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)