Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Philosophy of Chemistry and Chemistry Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transforming Teacher Education Through the Epistemic Core of Chemistry

Part of the book series: Science: Philosophy, History and Education ((SPHE))

Abstract

The chapter provides the background to why it is important to include epistemic themes in chemistry pre-service teacher education. It includes an introduction to the book by reviewing the literature on philosophy of chemistry and its broad implications for chemistry education. Philosophy of chemistry is the disciplinary context for the consideration of epistemic issues in chemistry. It is a relatively new area within philosophy of science having been formalised with its own journals and conferences since the 1990s. Although research at the intersection of philosophy of chemistry and chemistry education has begun to emerge, the focus on chemistry teacher education is practically non-existent in the literature. The review of the interplay between philosophy of chemistry and chemistry education suggests that the recommendations are fairly abstract for the pragmatic purposes of chemistry teacher education and do not take into consideration the empirical evidence on how pre-service teachers learn. In order to focus the discussion on some concise and useful ideas on what epistemic aspects of chemistry could be included in teacher education practice, we propose a framework consisting of the epistemic aims and values, practices, methods and knowledge of science. These components are collectively referred to as the “epistemic core”. The potential benefits of teaching and learning of the epistemic core are discussed, and a summary of the whole book is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aduriz-Bravo, A. (2013). A ‘semantic’ view of scientific models for science education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1593–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgun, S. (2018). University students’ understanding of the nature of science. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alayoglu, M. (2018). Fifth-grade students’ attitudes towards science and their understanding of its social-institutional aspects. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubusson, P., Treagust, D., & Harrison A. (2009). Learning and teaching science with analogies and metaphors. In The world of science education: Handbook of research in Australasia. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L. (2014). Studying science teacher identity: Current insights and future research directions. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, D., Scerri, E., & McIntyre, L. (2006). Introduction: The invisibility of chemistry. In D. Baird, E. Scerri, & L. McIntyre (Eds.), Philosophy of chemistry: Synthesis of a new discipline. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • BouJaoude, S., Dagher, Z., & Refai, S. (2017). The portrayal of nature of science in Lebanese ninth grade science textbooks. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-el-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks: A global perspective (pp. 79–97). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamizo, J. A. (1992). La química en secundaria, o por qué la enseñanza moderna de la química no es la enseñanza de la química moderna [Chemistry in junior high school, or why modern teaching of chemistry is not modern chemistry teaching]. Información Científica y Tecnológica, 14, 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamizo, J. A. (2013). A new definition of models and modeling in chemistry’s teaching. Science & Education, 22(7), 1613–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamizo, J. A. (2014). The role of instruments in three chemical’ revolutions. Science Education, 23, 955–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, S. F., Terlouw, C., Dijkstra, S., & Pieters, J. (2010). The effects of the design and development of a chemistry curriculum reform on teachers’ professional growth: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 535–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. B. (1948). Harvard case histories of experimental science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (2018). Chemistry education research- from personal empiricism to evidence, theory and informed practice. Chemical Reviews, 118(12), 6053–6087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, A. (2018). Incorporating nature of science in initial science teacher education. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Limerick, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science: Why does it matter? Science & Education, 25(1 & 2), 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z., & Erduran, S. (2017). Abandoning patchwork approaches to nature of science in science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R., Erduran, S., Grandy, R., & Rudolph, J. (2006). Guest editorial: Science studies and science education. Science Education, 90(6), 961–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, J. E. (2013). A new ‘idea of nature’ for chemical education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1775–1786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Science teachers’ use of visual representations. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, V., Blake, A., McNicholl, J., & McNally, J. (2011). The work of teacher education: The final research report for the Higher Education Academy, Subject Centre for Education. ESCalate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2001). Philosophy of chemistry: An emerging field with implications for chemical education. Science & Education, 10, 581–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2005). Applying the philosophical concept of reduction to the chemistry of water: Implications for chemical education. Science & Education, 14(2), 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2007). Breaking the law: Promoting domain-specificity in science education in the context of arguing about the periodic law in chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry, 9(3), 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2009). Beyond philosophical confusion: Establishing the role of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education research. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(10), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2013). Editorial: Philosophy, chemistry and education: An introduction. Science & Education, 22, 1559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2014). Beyond nature of science: The case for reconceptualising ‘science’ for science education. Science Education International, 25(1), 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2017). Visualising the nature of science: Beyond textual pieces to holistic images in science education. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, J. Lavonen, & A. Uitto (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2015 conference (pp. 15–30). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014a). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014b). Regaining focus in Irish junior cycle science: Potential new directions for curriculum development on nature of science. Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2018). Drawing nature of science in pre-service science teacher education: Epistemic insight through visual representations. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1133–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Gonzalez, M. (2013). Idealization in chemistry: Pure substance and laboratory product. Science & Education, 22(7), 1723–1740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D., & Bunce, D. (1984). Research on problem solving in chemistry. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301–326). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garritz, A. (2013). Teaching the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry through controversies. Science & Education, 22(7), 1787–1807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., & Boulter, C. (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 957–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., de Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D. F., & van Driel, J. H. (2003). Research and development for the future of chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Tragust, & J. H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research based practice (pp. 391–408). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. J. (1999). Why are chemists turned off by philosophy? Foundations of Chemistry, 1, 65–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Braten, I. (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Constructivism and metacognition: Theoretical issues and classroom studies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 129–140). Kiel, Germany: Institute of Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1988). Towards a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R., Minkin, V. I., & Carpenter, B. K. (1997). Ockham’s razor and chemistry. Hyle – An International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry, 3, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: An analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20, 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20, 591–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999–1021). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2013). School chemistry: An historical and philosophical approach. Science & Education, 22(7), 1633–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 701–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabas, N. (2017). The effect of scientific practice-based instruction on seventh graders’ perceptions of scientific practices. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, G. B. (1989). History in the chemistry curriculum. Interchange, 20(2), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2013). Integrating epistemological perspectives on chemistry in chemical education: The cases of concept duality, chemical language, and structural explanations. Science & Education, 22(7), 1741–1755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2016). From FRA to RFN, or how the family resemblance approach can be transformed for science curriculum analysis on nature of science. Science & Education, 25(9), 1115–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, E., Erduran, S., Aksoz, B., & Akgun, S. (2019). Reconceptualised family resemblance approach to nature of science in pre-service science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J. (2011). Scientific literacy, discourse, and epistemic practices. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P. Wickman, G. Erikson, & A. McKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 61–73). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1999). A development model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, P. (1999). Circulation of concepts. Foundations of Chemistry, 1, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, P. (2013). Towards teaching chemistry as a language. Science & Education, 22(7), 1669–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking – what can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythcott, J. (1990). Problem solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(3), 248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffy, P. (2006). Moving chemistry education into 3D: A tetrahedral metaphor for understanding chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2014). Science teaching. The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C. V. (2017). Exploring representations of nature of science in Australian junior secondary school science textbooks: A case study of genetics. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-el-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks: A global perspective (pp. 98–117). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, L., & Scerri, E. (1997). The philosophy of chemistry- editorial introduction. Synthese, 111(3), 211–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2013). Emergence, supervenience, and introductory chemical education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1655–1667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (1988). Manipulation of M demand of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance: A neo-Piagetian study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2011). Innovating science teacher education: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2016). Chemistry education and contributions from history and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field. Science Education, 95, 601–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Ribeiro, M. A., & Costa-Pereira, D. (2013). Constitutive pluralism of chemistry: Thought planning, curriculum, epistemological and didactic orientations. Science & Education, 22(7), 1809–1837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, F., & Teller, E. (1936). The role of free radicals in elementary organic reactions. Journal of Chemical Physics, 6, 489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B., & Munby, H. (1991). Concept mapping and misconceptions: A study of high-school students’ understanding of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, W. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. (1997). Are chemistry and philosophy miscible? The Chemical Intelligencer, 3, 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. (2000). Philosophy of chemistry-A new interdisciplinary field? Journal of Chemical Education, 77(4), 522–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R. (2007). The periodic table: Its story and its significance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström, J. (2013). Towards Bildung-oriented chemistry education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1873–1890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standen, A. (1948). Three ways of teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 25(9), 506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swennen, A., Jones, K., & Volman, M. (2010). Teacher educators: Their identities, sub-identities and implications for professional development. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 131–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talanquer, V. (2013). School chemistry: The need for transgression. Science & Education, 22(7), 1757–1773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. W., Goh, M. T., & Yeo, L. W. (2014). Chemistry education research trends: 2004–2013. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 470–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalos, M. (2013). The lens of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1707–1721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, E. (2013). Chemical laws, idealization and approximation. Science & Education, 22(7), 1581–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C.-C. (2004). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7), 970–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Brakel, J. (1997). Chemistry as the science of the transformation of substances. Synthese, 111(3), 253–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Brakel, J. (2000). Philosophy of chemistry: Between the manifest and the scientific image. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Brakel, J. (2010). A subject to think about: Essays on the history and philosophy of chemistry. Ambix, 57(2), 233–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, V. M., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2013). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in Nordic secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1839–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilches, A., & Gil-Perez, D. (2013). Creating a sustainable future: Some philosophical and educational considerations for chemistry teaching. Science & Education, 22(7), 1857–1872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, M., Needham, P., Hendry, R. (2011). Philosophy of chemistry. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woody, A. (2013). How is the ideal gas law explanatory? Science & Education, 22(7), 1563–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A. (2012). Explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge: Definitions, students’ learning, and teachers’ professional development. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (Vol. 40, pp. 197–223). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Sibel Erduran

  2. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ebru Kaya

Authors
  1. Sibel Erduran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ebru Kaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erduran, S., Kaya, E. (2019). Philosophy of Chemistry and Chemistry Education. In: Transforming Teacher Education Through the Epistemic Core of Chemistry. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15326-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15326-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15325-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15326-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation