Abstract
Focus groups are used for a wide variety of purposes in academic research, marketing, political campaigning, public deliberation, and policy research. A flexible method, focus groups can be understood as an extension of qualitative interviews in group contexts or as simulations of public discussion and debate. They are powerful tools that tap into processes of public discourse and therefore equally valuable to research and constitute important elements of public consultation and deliberation. The paper discusses the methodological and procedural decisions that face the researcher using focus groups and the skills required of the moderator. The paper also considers whether focus groups conducted in commercial, governmental and policy contexts enable public voices to be heard or constitute a managed show of engagement that enrolls participants in governance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albrecht, T. L., Johnson, G. M., & Walther, J. B. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (D. L. Morgan, Ed.). London: Sage.
Aradau, C., Huysmans, J., Neal, A., & Voelkner, N. (Eds.). (2015). Critical security methods: New frameworks for analysis. London: Routledge.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social science research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.
Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Featherstone, L. (2018). Talk is cheap: The myth of the focus group. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/feb/06/talk-is-cheap-the-myth-of-the-focus-group?CMP=share_btn_link.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (1962, trans. 1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into the categories of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jensen, K. B. (1991). Introduction: The qualitative turn. In K. B. Jensen & N. W. Jankowski (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 1–11). London: Routledge.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. New York: Free Press.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (John W. Kingdon, with new foreword by James A. Thurber). New York: Longman.
Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. London: Sage.
Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1993). The export of meaning: Cross cultural readings of Dallas. Cambridge: Polity.
Livingstone, S. M., & Lunt, P. K. (1994). Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate. London: Routledge.
Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (1993). Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 79–98. Online (1996). London: LSE Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000409.
Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Media regulation: Governance and the interests of citizens and consumers. London: Sage.
Lunt, P., Livingstone, S., & Malik, S. (2008). Public understanding of regimes of risk regulation: A report on focus group discussions with citizens and consumers. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21445/5/PURRR-Focus_Group_Report.pdf.
Merton, R. K. (1987). The focussed interview and focus groups: Continuities and discontinuities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 550–566.
Morley, D. (1980). The Nationwide audience: Structure and decoding. British Film Institute Television Monograph No. 11. London: British Film Institute.
Morrison, D. E. (1998). The search for method: Focus groups and the development of mass communication research. Luton: University of Luton Press.
Ofcom. (2016). Attitudes to potentially offensive language and gestures on TV and radio. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/91624/OfcomOffensiveLanguage.pdf.
Philo, G. (1993). Getting the message: Audience research in the Glasgow University Media Group. In J. Eldridge (Ed.), Getting the message: News, truth and power (pp. 253–270). London: Routledge (Glasgow University Media Group).
Wring, D. (2007). Focus group follies? Journal of Political Marketing, 5(4), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v05n04_04.
Further Reading
For an introduction of the focus group method see Bryman (2004), Chapter 16.
A paper that outlines methods and issues in focus group research see Lunt and Livingstone (1993).
For an in-depth analysis of the history of focus group research across the boundary of academic and policy research see Morrison (1998).
For an application of the focus group method in policy research see Ofcom (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lunt, P. (2019). Talking to People IV: Focus Groups. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16064-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16065-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)