Skip to main content
  • 3085 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the wide use of research reports as part of policy decision-making, for most scholars, academic publications (peer-reviewed journals and edited volumes or monographs) are the primary outlet for discussing evidence. Transposing evidence into specific policy reports therefore poses a challenge. This chapter specifically addresses the characteristics, advantages and difficulties involved in writing policy research reports. The chapter aims to fill a gap in policy analysis literature by combining insights into the logic and structure of policy research reports, as well as by providing specific guidelines for planning and writing them. The first part of the chapter contextualizes the increased use of policy research reports. The second part discusses the difficulties involved in translating academic research into comprehensible reports. The third and main part of the chapter deals with the actual structuring and writing of a policy report, presented in four different phases. Two cases of existing media research, a stakeholder consultation on impartiality of the Flemish public broadcaster, and a large-scale assessment of policy measures for audiovisual industries, are referred to as illustrative cases throughout the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bach, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E. (1996). The eight step path of policy analysis: A handbook for practice. Berkeley: Berkeley Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, A., & Thomson, R. (2015). Consultations with interest groups and the empowerment of executives: Evidence from the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 28(4), 517–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caeti. (2002). Policy research paper: Points to ponder (online). Retrieved from http://www.unt.edu/cjus/ponderp.htm.

  • Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policymaking. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulley, D. N. (2008). Making qualitative research reports less boring: The techniques of writing creative nonfiction. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(3), 424–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. (2012). Public policy analysis (4th ed.). London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Econopolis. (2017). Doorlichting van het Vlaams Audiovisueel Beleid. Eindrapport. Studie iov. Minister voor Media en Departement Cultuur, Jeugd, Sport en Media. Wilrijk: Econopolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (2008). The politics of media policy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, I. L., & Katz, J. E. (1975). Social science and public policy in the United States. L.A.: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, D. (1982). Developing useful evaluation: A case history and some practical guidelines. New directions for program equation (No. 14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavis, J., Robertson, D., Woodside, J. M., McLeod, C. B., & Abelson, J. (2003). How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. & Belohlav, K. (2014). Communicating research to policymakers: Researchers’ experiences. Research brief. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A. (1984). Methods for policy research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., & Markus, M. L. (2014). Methods for policy research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Waye Perry, B. (2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 729–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okaka, W., Nagasha, I. J., & Ayikoru (Eds.). (2016). Communicating policy, research and development. Communication for sustainable development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raats, T. (2015). ‘Een brede(r)(e) blik?’ Onderzoek naar de onpartijdigheid van de VRT. Onderzoek in opdracht van VRT Strategie (Undisclosed Report). Brussels: iMinds-SMIT en VRT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Robbins, A. E. (1982). Structured ethnography: The study of parental involvement. American Behavioral Scientist, 26(1), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, S., Lewis, J., & Brown, A. (2013). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C., Woodfield, K., Ritchie, J., & Ormston, R. (2013). Writing up qualitative research. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, E., & Quinn, L. (2002). Writing effective public policy papers: A guide for policy advisers in Central and Eastern Europe (p. 121). Budapest: Open Society Institute and Local Government Public Service Reform Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Caulley, D. N. (2008). Making qualitative research reports less boring: The techniques of writing creative nonfiction. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(3), 424–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2008). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Papers Guidelines. (2015). Retrieved at https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/White-Papers-Guidelines.pdf.

  • Young, E., & Quinn, L. (2002). Writing effective public policy papers: A guide for policy advisers in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute and Local Government Public Service Reform Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raats, T. (2019). Writing Policy Reports. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics