Abstract
The second part of the book is an extensive taxonomy of the drama of authorship which was introduced in the first half. The taxonomy uses Shakespearean films as a case study. Each part of the taxonomy conducts sustained textual analysis of key scenes from numerous Shakespearean adaptations which demonstrate different elements of adaptation’s anamorphism. This chapter addresses the most ubiquitous of these elements—the adaptation of some verbal dialogue, which foregrounds authorial origins, into visual images, which obfuscate those authorial origins. In order to distinguish this form of adaptation from a different form which is explored in the next chapter, I define the suppression of Shakespeare’s enunciating presence in favour of a seemingly ‘un-authored’ cinematic unfolding as a ‘fainomaic’ adaptation. I derive this from the Ancient Greek verb fainomai, meaning ‘to appear’, since it makes the verbal appear as the visual. The chapter breaks down this form of adaptation into a number of distinct categories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbate, Alessandro. 2007. “The Text Within the Text, the Screen Within the Screen: Multi-layered Representations in Michael Almereyda’s ‘Hamlet’ and Baz Luhrmann’s ‘Romeo + Juliet’.” In The Play Within the Play—The Performance of Meta-theatre and Self-reflection, edited by Gerhard Fischer and Bernhard Greiner, 377–92. New York: Rodopi.
Allen, Richard. 1995. Projecting Illusion: Film Spectatorship and the Impression of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Almereyda, Michael. 2000. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet: A Screenplay Adapted by Michael Almereyda. London: Faber and Faber.
Anderegg, Michael A. 2004. Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Andrew, Dudley. 1984. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andrews, Christopher. 2002. “Richard III on Film: The Subversion of the Viewer.” In Shakespeare into Film, edited by James Michael Welsh, Richard Vela, and John C. Tibbetts, 147–58. New York: Checkmark.
Austen, Jane. 1813. Pride and Prejudice. London: Thomas Egerton.
Barthes, Roland. 1995 [1967]. “The Death of the Author.” In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Seán Burke, 125–30. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Baudry, Jean-Louis. 1985. “Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus.” In Movies and Methods: Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 531–42. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Benveniste, Émile. 1970. Problems in General Linguistics. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables: Miami University Press.
Brown, Tom. 2012. Breaking the Fourth Wall: Direct Address in the Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Buchanan, Judith. 2005. Shakespeare on Film. Harlow: Pearson.
Buhler, Stephen M. 2000. “Camp ‘Richard III’ and the Burdens of (Stage/Film) History.” In Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, edited by Mark Thornton Burnett and Ramona Wray, 40–57. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Buhler, Stephen M. 2002. Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Calderwood, James L. 1971. Shakespearean Metadrama. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cartmell, Deborah, and Imelda Whelehan. 2010. Screen Adaptation: Impure Cinema. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cook, Patrick J. 2011. Cinematic Hamlet: The Films of Olivier, Zeffirelli, Branagh, and Almereyda. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Coursen, H.R. 2000. “Filming Shakespeare’s History: Three Films of ‘Richard III’.” In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, edited by Russell Jackson, 99–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, Anthony. 1988. Filming Shakespeare’s Plays: The Adaptations of Laurence Olivier, Orson Welles, Peter Brook and Akira Kurosawa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dickens, Charles. 1861. Great Expectations. London: Chapman & Hall.
Donaldson, Peter. 1990. Shakespearean Films/Shakespearean Directors. London: Unwin Hyman.
Feuer, Jane. 1993. The Hollywood Musical, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Fischer, Gerhard, and Bernhard Greiner, eds. 2007. The Play Within the Play: The Performance of Meta-theatre and Self-reflection. New York: Rodopi.
Grossman, Janet Burnett. 2003. Looking at Greek and Roman Sculpture in Stone. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.
Hatchuel, Sarah. 2004. Shakespeare, from Stage to Screen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, Stephen. 1985. “‘Jaws’, Ideology and Film Theory.” In Movies and Methods Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 509–14. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hirsch, James E. 2003. Shakespeare and the History of Soliloquies. London: Associated University Presses.
Holland, Peter. 1994. “Two-dimensional Shakespeare: ‘King Lear’ on Film.” In Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television, edited by Anthony Davies and Stanley Wells, 50–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hornby, Richard. 1986. Drama, Metadrama and Perception. London: Associated University Presses.
Howlett, Kathy M. 2000. Framing Shakespeare on Film. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Jackson, Russell. 2000. “From the Play-script to Screenplay.” In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, edited by Russell Jackson, 15–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jorgens, Jack J. 1977. Shakespeare on Film. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lehmann, Courtney. 2002. Shakespeare Remains: Theatre to Film, Early Modern to Postmodern. London: Cornell University Press.
Lindley, Arthur. 2002. “Scotland Saved from History: Welles’s ‘Macbeth’ and the Ahistoricism of Medieval Film.” In Shakespeare into Film, edited by James Michael Welsh, Richard Vela, and John C. Tibbetts, 141–5. New York: Checkmark.
Loehlin, James N. 2000. “‘These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends’: Baz Luhrmann’s Millennial Shakespeare.” In Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, edited by Mark Thornton Burnett and Ramona Wray, 121–36. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
MacCabe, Colin. 1985. Theoretical Essays; Film, Linguistics, Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
McFarlane, Brian. 1996. Novel to Film: An Introduction to the Theory of Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rasmus, Agnieszka. 2001. “‘I Could a Tale Unfold…’ From Metatheatre to Metacinema: Films within the Films in Shakespeare on Film.” Cadernos de Traduçäo 1, no. 7: 147–68.
Rothwell, Kenneth. 1999. A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Semenza, Gregory. 2018. “Towards a Historical Turn? Adaptation Studies and the Challenges of History.” In The Routledge Companion to Adaptation, edited by Dennis Cutchins, Katja Krebs, and Eckart Voigts, 58–66. London: Routledge.
Thompson, Ayanna, and Laura Turci. 2016. Teaching Shakespeare with Purpose: A Student-Centred Approach. London: Bloomsbury.
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1977. The Poetics of Prose. Translated by Richard Howard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wilson, Robert F., Jr. 2000. Shakespeare in Hollywood, 1929–1956. London: Associated University Presses.
Wollen, Peter. 1985. “Godard and Counter Cinema: ‘Vent D’Est’.” In Movies and Methods Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 500–9. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Worthen, W.B. 2003. Shakespeare and the Force of Modern Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Filmography
Cat Ballou. 1965. Directed by Elliot Silverstein. USA: Columbia.
Cesare Deve Morire (Caesar Must Die). 2012. Directed by Paolo Taviani and Vittorio Taviani. Italy: Kaos Cinematografica.
Great Expectations. 1946. Directed by David Lean. UK: Cineguild.
Hamlet. 1948. Directed by Laurence Olivier. UK: Two Cities.
Hamlet. 1964. Directed by Grigori Kozintsev. USSR: Lenfilm.
Hamlet. 1990. Directed by Franco Zeffirelli. USA: Warner Bros.
Hamlet. 1996. Directed by Kenneth Branagh. UK: Castle Rock/Columbia.
Hamlet. 2000. Directed by Michael Almereyda. USA: Double A Films.
Henry V. 1989. Directed by Kenneth Branagh. UK: Renaissance Films.
Jaws. 1975. Directed by Steven Spielberg. USA: Universal.
Julius Caesar. 1953. Directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz. USA: MGM.
Macbeth. 1948. Directed by Orson Welles. USA: Mercury Productions.
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. 2016. Directed by Burr Steers. UK/USA: Cross Creek Pictures.
Richard III. 1955. Directed by Laurence Olivier. UK: London Film Productions.
Richard III. 1995. Directed by Richard Loncraine. UK: United Artists.
Romeo and Juliet. 1954. Directed by Renato Castellani. UK/Italy: Rank.
Romeo and Juliet. 1968. Directed by Franko Zeffirelli. UK/Italy: BHE Films.
Titus. 1999. Directed by Julie Taymor. USA: Twentieth Century Fox.
William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet. 1996. Directed by Baz Luhrmann. USA: Twentieth Century Fox.
Paintings
Millais, John Everett. 1851–1852. Ophelia. Oil on canvas. London: Tate Britain.
Velázquez, Diego. 1656. Las Meninas (The Maids of Honour). Oil on canvas. Madrid: Museo del Prado.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geal, R. (2019). ‘Fainomaic’ Adaptation from the Verbal to the Visual. In: Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16496-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16496-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16495-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16496-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)