Abstract
Teaching engineering design can be an inexact art. Textbooks, tools, and methods do exist, but translation of this knowledge to design practice in the classroom setting may flounder for many reasons. There is often no script for the instructor to follow because design itself is a process that is amorphous, iterative, and coevolutionary. In this chapter, we seek to inform design instruction for engineering students that also can be generalized to many design-infused disciplines. A significant feature of teaching design involves practiced anticipation and listening to students’ doing and learning to design. Sometimes, students confront unfamiliar concepts and need to be guided toward a new approach that may conflict with their prior educational experiences. For instance, students experience “threshold concepts” requiring a shift in thinking from one of engineering problem-solving to design problem-finding. Additionally, ambiguity in design can create discomfort and uncertainty, slowing students from moving forward. This chapter draws on the experiences of three reflective design educators (also design researchers) resulting in a multiple perspective approach capturing insights into how teachers teach design. Using collaborative inquiry and reflective practice, we look for patterns as a way of making visible the instructional moves of design educators. We examine design instructional experiences through three theoretical and empirically grounded lenses: (1) Cognitive apprenticeship: mastering requisite skills through mindful and practiced expertise, (2) Teaching as improvisation: understanding teachers as adaptive and skilled improvisers responding to unpredictable demands in the moment (“prepared not planned”), and (3) Pedagogical content knowledge: means for capturing and reflecting on what we know about design in the classroom. The resulting framework offers an integrative perspective on understanding: design students as learners, effective approaches for their needs, and principles of design thinking. We present suggestions for developing instructional moves to engage with your own learners at various points throughout a design project through a “playbook” for design educators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams RS, Siddiqui JA (2015) Analyzing design review conversations. Purdue University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=_ClrDQAAQBAJ
Adams RS, Turns J, Atman CJ (2003) Educating effective engineering designers: the role of reflective practice. Des Stud 24(3):275–294
Adams R, Forin T, Chua M, Radcliffe D (2015) Making visible the “how” and “what” of design teaching. In: Adams R, Siddiqui JA (eds) Analyzing design review conversations. Purdue University Press, pp 431–456
Adams RS, Forin T, Chua, M, Radcliffe D (2016) Characterizing the work of coaching during design reviews. Des Stud 45:30–67
Adams RS, Aleong RJ, Goldstein M, Solis F (2017a) Problem structuring as co-inquiry. In: Christensen BT, Ball LJ, Halskov K (eds) Analysing design thinking: studies of cross-cultural co-creation. CRC Press
Adams RS, Forin T, Chua M, Radcliffe D (2017b) Approaches for coaching students in design reviews. ASEE Conference, OH.
Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing LTM (2003) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res Eng Design 14:1–11
Alliance for Justice (2015) Philanthropy advocacy playbook: leveraging your dollars. https://www.bolderadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/AFJ-Advocacy-Playbook-web.pdf
Ball DL, Thames MH, Phelps G (2008) Content knowledge for teaching. J Teach Educ 59(5):389–407
Barron B (2004) Learning ecologies for technological fluency: gender and experience differences. J Educ Comput Res 31(1):1–36
Brandt C, Cennamo K, Douglas S, Vernon M, McGrath M, Reimer Y (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. Int J Tech Des Educ 23(2):329–348
Bray JN (2002) Uniting teacher learning: collaborative inquiry for professional development. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 94
Bray JN, Lee J, Smith LL, Yorks, L (2000) Collaborative inquiry in practice: action, reflection, and making meaning. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA
Brennan KA (2013). Best of both worlds: issues of structure and agency in computational creation, in and out of school. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cardella ME, Buzzanell PM, Cummings A, Tolbert D, Zoltowski CB (2014) A tale of two design contexts: quantitative and qualitative explorations of student-instructor interactions amidst ambiguity. In: Design Thinking Research Symposium. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Carlson T, Cockayne W, Tahvanainen A (2013) Playbook for strategic foresight and innovation. https://www.thegeniusworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Playbook-for-Strategic-Foresight-and-Innovation-A4.pdf
Cennamo K, Brandt C, Scott B, Douglas S, McGrath M, Reimer Y, Vernon M (2011) Managing the complexity of design problems through studio-based Learning. Interdisc J Prob-Based Learn 5(2)
Collins A, Brown JS, Holum A (1991) Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. Am Educ 6:38–46
Coso AE (2014) Preparing students to incorporate stakeholder requirements in aerospace vehicle design. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Coso Strong A, Lande M, Adams RS (2018) Special session: put me in coach! Developing a design playbook for instructors to help engineering students do design. Frontiers in education conference, San Jose, CA. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658648
Crismond DP, Adams RS (2012) The informed design teaching and learning matrix. J Eng Educ 101(4):738–797
Cross N (1982) Designerly ways of knowing. Des Stud 3(4):221–227
Crossan MM (1998) Improvisation in action. Organ Sci 9(5):593–599
Dannels DP (2003) Teaching and learning design presentations in engineering: contradictions between academic and workplace activity systems. J Bus Tech Commun 17(2):139–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651902250946
Dannels DP, Martin KN (2008) Critiquing critiques. J Bus Tech Commun 22(2):135–159
Dickens M, Jordan SS, Lande M (2016) Parents and roles in informal making education: informing and implications for making in museums. American Society for Engineering Education annual conference, New Orleans, LA. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25854
Donohoo J (2013) Collaborative inquiry for educators: a facilitator’s guide to school improvement. Corwin A SAGE Company, Thousand Oaks, CA
Downey G, Lucena J (2003) When students resist: ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. Int J Eng Educ 19(1):168–176
Dym CL, Agogino AM, Eris O, Frey DD, Leifer LJ (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. J Eng Educ 103–120
Eris O (2004) Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design, vol. 10. Springer Science & Business Media
Fallon J, Verwayen H (2017) Introducing: impact playbook for museums, libraries, and archives. Europeana. https://pro.europeana.eu/post/introducing-the-impact-playbook-the-cultural-heritage-professionals-guide-to-assessing-your-impact
Feland J, Cockayne W, Leifer LJ (2004) Comprehensive design engineering: designers taking responsibility. Int J Eng Educ 20(3):416–423
Fincher S, Finlay J, Sharp H, Falconer I, Richards Board (2012) Change stories: a white paper from the share project. http://www.sharingpractice.ac.uk
Gess-Newsome J (1999) Pedagogical content knowledge: an introduction and orientation. In: J. Gess-Newsome (ed) Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Goldschmidt G (2006) Expert knowledge or creative spark? predicaments in design education. In: Proceedings of the 6th DTRS symposium, Sydney, AU
Goldschmidt G, Hochman H, Dafni I (2010) The design studio crit: teacher student communication. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 24(3):285–302
Goldschmidt G, Casakin H, Avidan Y, Ronen O (2014) Three studio critiquing cultures: fun follows function or function follows fun? In: Design thinking research symposium. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Goncher A, Johri A (2015) Contextual constraining of student design practices. J Eng Educ 104(3):252–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20079
Hargadon AB (2002) Brokering knowledge: linking learning and innovation. Res Organ Behav 24:41–85
Hlubinka M, Dougherty D, Thomas P, Chang S, Hoefer S, Alexander I, McGuire D (2013) Makerspace playbook: school edition. https://makered.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Makerspace-Playbook-Feb-2013.pdf
Huet G, Culley SJ, McMahon CA, Fortin C (2007) Making sense of engineering design review activities. AI EDAM 21(03):243
Isaacs-Sodeye O, Lande M (2013) Teaching with unfamiliar pedagogy for engineering design instructors. Frontiers in Education conference, Oklahoma City, OK, pp 1447–1449. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6685071
Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Des Stud 12(1):3–11
Kasl E, Yorks L (2002) Collaborative inquiry as a strategy for adult learning. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 94(94):112
King KB, West JR (2018) Futures thinking playbook: what might the future be like and what can we do to shape it? CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
Koen BV (1994) Toward a strategy for teaching engineering design. J Eng Educ 83(3):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb01104.x
Lande M (2012) Ambidextrous mindsets for innovation: designing and engineering. PhD thesis, Stanford University
Lande M (2016) Catalysts for design thinking & engineering thinking: fostering ambidextrous mindsets for innovation. Int J Eng Educ 32:1356–1363
Lande M, Leifer L (2010) Difficulties student engineers face designing the future. Int J Eng Educ 26:271–277
Lande M, Jordan S, Weiner S (2017) Making people and projects: implications for making-based learning. In: American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest conference. Tempe, AZ
Leifer LJ, Steinert M (2011) Dancing with ambiguity: causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning. Inf Knowl Syst Manag 10(1–4):151–173
Lewrick M, Link P, Leifer L (2018) Design thinking playbook. Wiley
Limbert T (2012) Dad’s playbook: wisdom for fathers from the greatest coaches of all time. Chronicle Books LLC
Magnusson S, Krajcik, Borko H (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In: Gess-Newsome J & Lederman N (eds) Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Kluwer Publishing, Boston, p 95–128
McDonnell J (2016) Scaffolding practices: a study of design practitioner engagement in design education. Des Stud 45:9–29
New Learning (n.d.) Repertoire of practice. http://newlearningonline.com/learning-by-design/glossary/repertoire-of-practice
Newstetter WC (1998) Of green monkeys and failed affordances: a case study of a mechanical engineering design course. Res Eng Design 10(2):118–128
Oak A, Lloyd P (2014) Throw one out that’s problematic: performing authority and affiliation in design education. CoDesign (1–2):55–72
Olsen D (2015) The lean product playbook: how to innovate with minimum viable products and rapid customer feedback. Wiley Publishers
Oplinger J, Lande M (2014). Disciplinary discourse in design reviews: industrial design and mechanical engineering courses. In: Proceedings of DTRS 10, Purdue University, IN
Oplinger J, Lande M, Jordan S, Camarena L (2016) Making leaders: leadership characteristics of makers and engineers in the maker community. Am J Eng Educ 7(2):65–82
Oxman R (1999) Educating the designerly thinker. Des Stud 20(2):105–122
Paretti MC (2008) Teaching communication in capstone design: the role of the instructor in situated learning. Journal of Engineering Education 97(4):491–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x
Pritchard C, Sanders P (2002) Weaving our stories as they weave us. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 94
Reich Y, Ullmann G, Van der Loos M, Leifer L (2009) Coaching product development teams: a conceptual foundation for empirical studies. Res Eng Des 19(4):205–222
Sawyer RK (2004) Improvised lessons: collaborative discussion in the constructivist classroom. Teach Educ 15 (2):189–201
Sawyer RK (2008) Learning music from collaboration. International Journal of Educational Research 47 (1):50-59
Sawyer K (ed) (2011). Structure and improvisation in creative teaching. Cambridge University Press
Schon DA (1984) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books. https://books.google.com/books?id=ceJIWay4-jgC
Schön DA (1993) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action basic books, New York
Sheppard M, Jordan S, Lande M, McKenna A (2018) Exploring making-based pedagogy in undergraduate mezzanine-level engineering courses. In: American Society for Engineering Education. Education and research methods division. Salt Lake City, UT
Shulman L (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 57(1):1–23
Solis F, Coso Strong A, Adams R, Turns J, Crismond D (2016) Towards a scholarship of integration: lessons from four cases. In: 2016 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition
Sonalkar N, Mabogunje A, Pai G, Krishnan A, Roth B (2016) Diagnostics for design thinking teams. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research. Understanding innovation. Springer, Cham
Strickfaden M, Heylighen A (2007) Exploring the ‘cultural capital’ of design. In: International conference on engineering design, pp. 1–10
Strickfaden M, Heylighen A (2010) Scrutinizing design educators’ perceptions of the design process. Artif Intell Eng Des, Anal Manuf: AIEDAM 24(3):357–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000247
Sypolt G (2017) Building an agile process playbook for software testing. Sauce Labs. https://saucelabs.com/blog/building-an-agile-process-playbook-for-software-testing
Turns J, Cardella M, Atman CJ, Martin J, Adams RS (2006a) Tackling the research-to-teaching challenge in engineering design education: making the invisible visible 22(3):598–608
Turns J, Adams RS, Martin J, Cardella M, Mosborg S, Atman CJ (2006b) Tackling the research-to-practice challenge in engineering design education: insights from a user-centered design perspective. Int J of Eng Educ
Turns JA, Sattler B, Thomas LD, Atman CJ, Bankhead RB, Carberry AR, Csavina KR, Cunningham P, Faust DK, Harding TS, Yasuhara K (2015) Reflecting on reflection: how educators experience the opportunity to talk about supporting student reflection. In: 2016 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition
Uluoǧlu B (2000) Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. Des Stud 21(1):33–58
Valkenburg R (2001) Schön revised: describing team designing with reflection-in-action. In: Proceedings of design thinking research symposium, vol 5, pp 1–15
Valkenburg R, Dorst K (1998) The reflective practice of design teams. Des Stud 19(3):249–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8
Walther J, Pawley A, Sochacka N (2015) Exploring ethical validation as a key consideration in interpretive research quality. In: American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition. Seattle, WA. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24063
Walther J, Sochacka NW, Benson LC, Bumbaco AE, Kellam N, Pawley AL, Phillips C ML (2017) Qualitative research quality: a collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives. J Eng Educ 106(3):398–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20170
Wolmarans N (2016) Inferential reasoning in design: relations between material product and specialised disciplinary knowledge. Des Stud 45:92–115
Yilmaz S, Daly SR (2016) Feedback in concept development: comparing design disciplines. Des Stud 45:137–158
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coso Strong, A., Lande, M., Adams, R. (2019). Teaching Without a Net: Mindful Design Education. In: Schaefer, D., Coates, G., Eckert, C. (eds) Design Education Today. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17133-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17134-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)