Abstract
This chapter presents a trifecta of assumptions and philosophies shaping our discourse and sustaining trivialization. It begins with essentialism, a set of deeply ingrained, yet problematic assumptions that continue to alter the way most people perceive and approach the organization, properties, and problems of social and natural systems. It continues with reductionism, an idea that all phenomena, regardless of domain, can be understood through their more basic or fundamental parts. The third enabler is the recent resurfacing of various forms of relativism, the idea that truth and knowledge can be judged only relative to a particular situation. The chapter concludes with a lesson from history, a return to irrationality, discerned by some in the contemporary developments, motivating us to further engagement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Alberts, Jeffrey R. 2002. “Simply complex: Essentialism trumps reductionism.” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2 (5): 379–381.
Alesina, Alberto, and Edward Ludwig Glaeser. 2004. Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. New York: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, Lisa. 2015. “Essentialist Views of the Mind.” In This idea must die: Scientific theories that are blocking progress, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial.
Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brockman, John, ed. 2009. What have you changed your mind about?: Today’s leading minds rethink everything. New York: HarperCollins.
Butler, Christopher. 2002. Postmodernism: A very short introduction, vol. 74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CMA (Canadian Medical Association). 2015. “Obesity in Canada: Causes, Consequences and the Way Forward.” Submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. https://www.sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/412/SOCI/Briefs/2015-06-10CanadianMedicalAssocWrittenObesityBrief_e.pdf.
Dawkins, Richard. 2015. “Essentialism.” In This idea must die: Scientific theories that are blocking progress, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial.
Dodds, Eric Robertson. 1959. The Greeks and the irrational, vol. 25. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against method. London: Verso.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. “Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 391–416.
Flax, Jane. 1990. Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Yascha Mounk. 2016. “The democratic disconnect.” Journal of Democracy 27 (3): 5–17.
Gelman, Susan A. 2003. The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2015. “The pursuit of parsimony.” In This idea must die: Scientific theories that are blocking progress, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial.
Heilbron, John L. 2012. Galileo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kohli, Atul, Peter Evans, Peter J. Katzenstein, Adam Przeworski, Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, James C. Scott, and Theda Skocpol. 1995. “The role of theory in comparative politics: A symposium.” World Politics 48 (1): 1–49.
Lennon, Kathleen. 1997. “Feminist epistemology as local epistemology.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71: 37. As cited in Boghossian (2006).
Levinovitz, Alan Jay. 2017. “It’s not all relative.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 5. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Its-Not-All-Relative/239356.
May, Theresa. 2016. “Theresa May’s speech on grammar schools.” New Statesman, September 9. www.newstatesman.com/politics/education/2016/09/full-text-theresa-mays-speech-grammar-schools.
NHS (National Health Service). 2016. “Obesity—Causes.” https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/obesity/causes/.
NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2016. “What causes obesity & overweight?” https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/obesity/conditioninfo/cause.
Norris, Christopher. 1995. “Culture, criticism and communal values: On the ethics of enquiry” In Theorizing culture: An interdisciplinary critique after postmodernism, edited by Barbara Adam and Stuart Allan. New York: NYU Press.
Pascale, Celine-Marie. 2010. Cartographies of knowledge: Exploring qualitative epistemologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richerson, Peter. 2015. “Human nature.” In This idea must die: Scientific theories that are blocking progress, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial.
Sawyer, R. Keith. 2005. Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sayer, Andrew. 2000. Realism and social science. London: Sage.
Sayer, Andrew. 2010. “Reductionism in social science.” In Questioning nineteenth century assumptions about knowledge, II: Reductionism, edited by Richard E. Lee, 5–39. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Stone, Deborah. 1989. “Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2), 281–300.
Taylor, Timothy. 2009. “The trouble with relativism.” In What have you changed your mind about?: Today’s leading minds rethink everything, edited by John Brockman. New York: HarperCollins.
Trigg, Roger. 1998. Rationality and religion. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bubak, O., Jacek, H. (2019). The Uneasy World of “Isms”. In: Trivialization and Public Opinion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17925-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17925-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17924-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17925-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)