Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental, Economic, and Social Impacts of Biofuel Production from Sugarcane in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sugarcane Biofuels

Abstract

In this chapter, the environmental, social, and economic impacts of bioethanol produced from sugarcane are discussed in the context of Queensland where most of Australia’s cane is grown and processed. A brief background on sugarcane cultivation and processing precedes the discussion on the impacts. The benefits of bioethanol production from sugarcane include alleviation of carbon emissions, diminution of fuel imports, reduction in rural migration to cities because of employment generation, and synthesis of bio-based products. On the other hand, the negative impacts involve nutrient leaching into water bodies, land degradation, and the effects on native title. Recent introduction of corrective programs both by the federal (GBR Foundation Partnership) and the state (Queensland Biofutures Program) governments hopefully will find appropriate solutions to minimize the negative impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrifutures (2018) Biomass and bioenergy. https://www.agrifutures.com.au/partnerships/biomass-bioenergy. Accessed 29 Nov 2018

  • Akbar D, Subedi R, Rolfe J, Ashwath N, Rahman A (2018) Reviewing commercial prospects of bioethanol as a renewable source of future energy – an Australian perspective. In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of Industry (2014) Ethanol production grant program. http://www.business.gov.au/grants-and-assistance/energy-fuels/Ethanol-Production-Grants/Documents/EPG-PAGs-approved.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2018

  • Australian Sugar Milling Council (2018) Sugar industry statistics. https://asmc.com.au. Accessed 12 Nov 2018

  • Bell DR, Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH, Kamens R (2011) The net cost of biofuels in Thailand: an economic analysis. Energy Policy 39(2):834–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bioenergy Australia (2018) Ethanol in Australia. http://biofuelassociation.com.au. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • Biofuel Association of Australia (2014) Taxation treatment of biofuels. http://biofuelsassociation.com.au/policy/policy-and-excise-framework/taxation-treatment-of-biofuels. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics (2014) An assessment of key costs and benefits associated with the Ethanol Production Grants Program. http://www.industry.gov.au. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • Cochran M, Hughes G, Bethune G (2010) Benchmarking the price of fuel ethanol in Australia, Report to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Waymouth, p 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Australia (2010) Australian energy resource assessment. Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism, Geoscience Australia, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (2007) Biofuel in Australia: issues and prospects. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Government of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis AM, Thorburn PJ, Lewis SE, Bainbridge ZT, Attard SJ, Milla R, Brodie JE (2013) Environmental impacts of irrigated sugarcane production: herbicide run-off dynamics from farms and associated drainage systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas A (2009) Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuel: a review. Appl Energy 86:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (2013) Queensland agricultural land audit. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland Government, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment and Energy (2017) Australian energy update 2017, Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.energy.gov.au/sites/g/files/net3411/f/energy-update-report-2017.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2018

  • Department of Environment and Energy (2018a) Quarterly update of Australia’s national greenhouse gas inventory: March 2018. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/63391569-7ffa-4395-b245-e53893158566/files/nggi-quarterly-update-mar-2018.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2018

  • Department of Environment and Energy (2018b) Great barrier reef partnerships for the future. https://www.environment.gov.au. Accessed 12 Nov 2018

  • Department of Natural Resources Mines and Energy (2015) Queensland biofuel mandate. Queensland Government. http://www.business.qld.gov.au. Accessed 11 Nov 2018

  • Duffy C (2012) Common herbicide “Threatens Great Barrier Reef”’ ABC News, 27 March 2012. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-27/bgreat-barrier-reef-herbicide/3914382. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • Ethanol Facts (n.d.) A cleaner, greener fuel. https://www.ethanolfacts.com.au/cleaner-greener. Accessed 10 Dec 2018

  • Fair Trading NSW (2015) Biofuels industry. http://fairtrading.NSW.gov.au. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • Farrell R (2014) Australia biofuels annual. Report no. AS1415, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network, United States Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization (2012) Biofuels and food security-a consultation by the HLPE to set the track of its study. http://www.fao.org. Accessed 11 Nov 2018

  • Fritsche UR, Hennenberg KJ, Hünecke K, Herrera R, Wiegmann K (2011) Sustainable bioenergy: key criteria and indicators. Öko-Institut, Freiberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparatos A, Stromberg P, Takeuchi K (2011) Biofuels, ecosystem service and human wellbeing: putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142:111–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German L, Schoneveld GC, Pacheco P (2011) The social and environmental impacts of biofuel feedstock cultivation: evidence from multi-site research in forest frontier. Ecol Soc 16(3):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Agricultural Industrial Network (2017) Australia biofuel annual. GAIN report number: AS1712, USADA Foreign Agricultural Services, United States Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall J, Matos S, Silvestre B, Martin M (2011) Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: the evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(7):1147–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany S (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuel. PNAS 103(30):11206–11201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes G (2014a) Hitting the target: how much pollution can the great barrier reef handle? WWF-Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes G (2014b) Australia’s pesticide environmental risk assessment failure: the case of diuron and sugarcane. Mar Pollut Bull 88:7–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holtum J, Chambers D (2010) Feasibility of Agave as a feedstock for biofuel production in Australia. Rural Industry Research and Development Corporation, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MR, Singles A, Ruane A (2015) Simulated impacts of climate change on water use and yield of sugarcane in South Africa. Agric Syst 139:10

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MT, Seema N, Khan IA, Yasmine S (2017) Applications and potential of sugarcane as an energy crop. In: Gorawala P, Mandhatri S (eds) Agricultural research updates, vol 16. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapola DM, Schaldacha R, Alcamoa J, Bondeaud A, Kocha J, Koelkinga C, Priess JA (2010) Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(8):3388–3393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luk J, Fernandes H, Kumar A (2010) A conceptual framework for siting biorefineries in the Canadian prairies. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4(4):408–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo IC, Seabra JEA, Silva JEAR (2008) Greenhouse gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass Bioenergy 32:582–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neves MF (2010) Clean energy policies for China: the case of ethanol. China Agric Econ Rev 2(4):472–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara I (2010) The potential of ethanol production from sugarcane in Australia, http://eprints.qut.edu.au/56545/1/M_17_The_potential_for_ethanol_-_accepted_version.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • O’Hara I (2011) Cellulosic ethanol from sugarcane bagasse in Australia: exploring industry feasibility through systems analysis, techno-economic assessment and pilot plant development, Dissertation, Queensland University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena N, Bird DN, Zanchi G (2010) Improved methods for carbon accounting for bioenergy: descriptions and evaluations. CIFOR Occasional Paper. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters J, Thielmann S (2008) Promoting biofuels: implication for developing countries. Energy Policy 36(4):1538–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrolworld (2008) Malaysia: envo diesel biofuel to be replaced with methyl ester. http://www.petrolworld.com/alternativefuels/malaysia-envo-dieselbiofuel-to-be-replaced-with-methylester.html. Accessed 20 May 2018

  • Pleven RJ, O’Hare M, Jones AD, Torn MS, Gibbs HK (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels’ indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environ Sci Technol 44:8015–8021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad P, Pullar D, Pratt S (2014) Facilitating access to the algal economy: mapping waste resources to identify suitable locations for algal farms in Queensland. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri M, Abraham RE, Barrow CJ (2012) Biofuel production: prospects, challenges and feedstock in Australia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(8):6022–6031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government (2018) The Smartcane Best Management Practice (BMP) program. https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/agriculture/sustainable-farming/reef/reef-initiatives/best-practice. Accessed 10 Nov 2018

  • Sugar Notes (1997) Queensland Sugar Corporation, Brisbane, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijal D, Walsh KB, Subedi PP, Ashwath N (2016a) Quality estimation of Agave tequilana leaf for bioethanol production. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 24:453–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rijal D, Vancov T, McIntosh S, Ashwath N, Stanley GA (2016b) Process options for conversion of Agave tequilana leaves into bioethanol. Ind Crop Prod 84:263–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roebeling PC, Webster AJ, Biggs J, Thorburn P (2007) Financial-economic analysis of current best management practices for sugarcane, horticulture, grazing and forestry industries in the Tully-Murray catchment. Report to the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre, Cairns, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi AM, Hinrichs CC (2011) Hope and skepticism: farmer and local community views on the socio-economic benefits of agricultural bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 35(4):1418–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rural Industry Research and Development Corporation (2018) Biomass producer. Government of Australia, Canberra. http://biomassproducer.com.au/markets/bioenergy-markets-in-australia/ethanol/#projects. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • Sawaengsak W, Gheewala SH (2017) Analysis of social and socio-economic impacts of sugarcane production: a case study in Nakhon Ratchasima province of Thailand. J Clean Prod 142(3):1169–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer D (2008) Climate change, biofuels and eco-social impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 363(1498):1747–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selfa T, Kulcsar L, Bain C, Goe R, Middendorf G (2011) Biofuels bonanza? Exploring community perceptions of the promises and perils of biofuels production. Biomass Bioenergy Policy 35:1379–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets E, Junginger M, Faaij A, Walter A, Dolzan P, Turkenburg W (2008) The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol—an assessment of the possibilities of certified production. Biomass Bioenergy Policy 39(2):834–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Poggio MJ, Thompson M, Collier A (2014) The economics of pesticide management practices on sugarcane farms: final synthesis report. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) Queensland, Brisbane. http://era.daf.qld.gov.au. Accessed 21 July 2018

  • Sobrino FH, Monroy CR, Perez JLH (2010) Critical analysis on hydrogen as an alternative to fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles in Europe. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(2):772–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornburn PJ, Biggs JS, Attard SJ, Kemei J (2011) Environmental impacts of irrigated sugarcane production: nitrogen lost through runoff and leaching. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314(5805):1598–1600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008) The emerging biofuels market: regulatory, trade and development implications. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (2017) Foreign Agricultural Service, Canberra. https://www.fas.usda.gov. Accessed 20 Aug 2018

  • Waterhouse J, Brodie J, Lewis S, Mitchell A (2012) The catchment to reef continuum: case studies from the great barrier reef. Mar Pollut Bull 4(65):77–80. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X11005194

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia Contributors (2018) Ethanol fuel in Brazil. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ethanol_fuel_in_Brazil&oldid=869545338. Accessed 30 Nov 2018

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Muhammad Tahir Khan for inviting to write this review paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Queensland University, School of Health, Medical and Environmental Sciences, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia

    Nanjappa Ashwath

  2. The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

    Zobaidul Kabir

Authors
  1. Nanjappa Ashwath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zobaidul Kabir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanjappa Ashwath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Sugarcane Biotechnology Group, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tandojam, Pakistan

    Muhammad Tahir Khan

  2. Sugarcane Biotechnology Group, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tandojam, Pakistan

    Imtiaz Ahmed Khan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ashwath, N., Kabir, Z. (2019). Environmental, Economic, and Social Impacts of Biofuel Production from Sugarcane in Australia. In: Khan, M., Khan, I. (eds) Sugarcane Biofuels. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18597-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation