Skip to main content

Many-Objective Optimization with Limited Computing Budget

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
High-Performance Simulation-Based Optimization

Abstract

Designers are increasingly being confronted with practical applications that require solution of optimization problems with more than three conflicting objectives. In recent years, a number of efficient algorithms have been proposed to deal with such problems, commonly referred to as many-objective optimization problems (MaOP). However, most such algorithms require evaluation of numerous solutions prior to convergence which may not be affordable for practical applications involving computationally expensive evaluations. While surrogates or approximations have long been used to deal with single-/multi-objective optimization problems involving expensive evaluations, they are not designed to deal with MaOPs which involve unique set of challenges. In this chapter, we introduce a surrogate-assisted optimization algorithm for many-objective optimization (SaMaO) which is capable of delivering converged and well distributed set of solutions within a limited computing budget. The proposed algorithm successfully combines features of state-of-the-art MaOPs and surrogate-assisted optimization strategies. The algorithm relies on principles of decomposition and adaption of reference vectors for effective search. The flexibility of function representation is offered through the use of multiple types of surrogate models. Furthermore, to efficiently deal with constrained MaOPs, marginally infeasible solutions are promoted during initial phases of the search. The performance of the proposed algorithm is objectively evaluated and compared with state-of-the-art approaches using three to ten objective DTLZ and WFG benchmarks, recently introduced minus DTLZ and minus WFG benchmarks and constrained C-DTLZ benchmarks. The results clearly highlight the competence of the proposed approach. The chapter also provides a summary of considerations that are important for practical applications and areas which need further development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhattacharjee, K.S., Singh, H.K., Ray, T.: Multi-objective optimization with multiple spatially distributed surrogates. J. Mech. Des. 138(9), 091–401 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharjee, K.S., Singh, H.K., Ray, T.: A novel decomposition based evolutionary algorithm for engineering design optimization. J. Mech. Des. 139(4), 041–403 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharjee, K.S., Singh, H.K., Ray, T.: Multiple surrogate-assisted many-objective optimization for computationally expensive engineering design. J. Mech. Des. 140(5), 051–403 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharjee, K.S., Singh, H.K., Ryan, M., Ray, T.: Bridging the gap: Many-objective optimization and informed decision-making. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 21(5), 813–820 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, R., Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., Sendhoff, B.: A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20(5), 773–791 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chugh, T., Jin, Y., Meittinen, K., Hakanen, J., Sindhya, K.: A surrogate-assisted reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for computationally expensive many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22(1), 129–142 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chugh, T., Sindhya, K., Miettinen, K., Hakanen, J., Jin, Y.: On constraint handling in surrogate-assisted evolutionary many-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 214–224 (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Das, I., Dennis, J.E.: Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 8(3), 631–657 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization, pp. 105–145 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., While, L.: A review of multi-objective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10(5), 477–506 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Isaacs, A., Ray, T., Smith, W.: Multi-objective design optimisation using multiple adaptive spatially distributed surrogates. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 9(1–3), 188–217 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishibuchi, H., Masuda, H., Tanigaki, Y., Nojima, Y.: Modified distance calculation in generational distance and inverted generational distance. In: International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pp. 110–125. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: A short review. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2419–2426 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ishibuchi, H., Yu, S., Hiroyuki, M., Yusuke, N.: Performance of decomposition-based many-objective algorithms strongly depends on Pareto front shapes. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 21(2), 169–190 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jain, H., Deb, K.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point based nondominated sorting approach, part II: Handling constraints and extending to an adaptive approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 602–622 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin, Y.: A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation. Soft Comput.-Fusion Found., Methodol. Appl. 9(1), 3–12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jin, Y.: Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges. Swarm Evol. Comput. 1(2), 61–70 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Knowles, J.: ParEGO: A hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10(1), 50–66 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, B., Li, J., Tang, K., Yao, X.: Many-objective evolutionary algorithms: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 48(1), 13:1–13:35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, K., Deb, K., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm based on dominance and decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(5), 694–716 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miettinen, K.: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Ray, T., Singh, H.K., Isaacs, A., Smith, W.F.: Infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization. In: Constraint-Handling in Evolutionary Optimization, pp. 145–165 (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Runarsson, T.P., Yao, X.: Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 4(3), 284–294 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh, H.K., Alam, K., Ray, T.: Use of infeasible solutions during constrained evolutionary search: A short survey. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Life and Computational Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9592, pp. 193–205. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Singh, H.K., Isaacs, A., Ray, T.: Infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm (IDEA) for engineering design optimization. In: Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5361, pp. 104–115 (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh, H.K., Ray, T., Sarker, R.: Optimum oil production planning using infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm. Evol. Comput. 21(1), 65–82 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahama, T., Sakai, S.: Constrained optimization by applying the \(\alpha \) constrained method to the nonlinear simplex method with mutations. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 9(5), 437–451 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. The Mathworks, Inc.: Matlab 2015b. www.mathworks.com/products/matlab

  30. Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., Jin, Y.: PlatEMO: A MATLAB platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization [educational forum]. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 12(4), 73–87 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trivedi, A., Srinivasan, D., Sanyal, K., Ghosh, A.: A survey of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 21(3), 440–462 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Voss, T., Beume, N., Rudolph, G., Igel, C.: Scalarization versus indicator-based selection in multi-objective cma evolution strategies. In: Proceedings of International Conference on IEEE Congress Evolutionary Computation, pp. 3036–3043 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, G.G., Shan, S.: Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J. Mech. Des. 129(4), 370–380 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yuan, Y., Xu, H., Wang, B., Yao, X.: A new dominance relation-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 20(1), 16–37 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., Da Fonseca, V.G.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: An analysis and review. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapabrata Ray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhattacharjee, K.S., Singh, H.K., Ray, T. (2020). Many-Objective Optimization with Limited Computing Budget. In: Bartz-Beielstein, T., Filipič, B., Korošec, P., Talbi, EG. (eds) High-Performance Simulation-Based Optimization. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 833. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18764-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics