Skip to main content

The Role of Customer Retention in Business Outcomes of Online Service Providers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Applications, Markets and Services in the Finance Industry (FinanceCom 2018)

Abstract

Despite great business outcomes that some service providers achieve on crowdsourcing marketplaces, many are unable to find customers, transact on a regular basis and survive. Previous research on the customer–provider relationship development in these marketplaces has shown the impact of provider profiles on customers’ decision-making and highlighted the role of prior relationship between the two parties as a major determinant of provider selection decisions of customers. However, little is known about the role of prior relationship and customer retention on the business outcomes of providers. This study theorizes a mediating impact versus a moderating impact of customer retention on the association between profile information and business outcomes of providers, building on the integrated information response model (IIRM). This study investigates two competing theoretical models using archival data from a leading crowdsourcing marketplace. The results show that a provider’s profile information is significantly associated with the provider’s business outcomes, while customer retention partially mediates this relationship for the self-provided information on the profile. Moreover, customer retention negatively moderates the positive impact of the customer-provided information on the provider’s business outcomes, implying the important role of new customers in achieving better business outcomes on crowdsourcing marketplaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Banker, R., Wattal, S., Hwang, I.: Determinants of firm survival in e-Markets: an analysis with software service providers. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexa. Alexa Site Information (2016). http://www.alexa.com/. Accessed 01 Feb 2016

  3. Freelancer.com. Full Year Results 2014 (2015). http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20150216/pdf/42wm4m1b1r79z0.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  4. Freelancer.com. About the Company (2016). https://www.freelancer.com/. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  5. Guru.com. About the Company (2015). http://www.guru.com/. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  6. Upwork.com. Online Work Report: Global, 2014 Full Year Data (2015). http://elance-odesk.com/online-work-report-global. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  7. Upwork.com. About the Company (2015). https://www.upwork.com/about/. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  8. Upwork.com. About the Company (2018). https://www.upwork.com/about/. Accessed 26 Feb 2018

  9. Barrie, M.: Freelancer 1H17 Half Year Results (2017). www.Freelancer.com

  10. Guru.com. About the Company (2018). http://www.guru.com/. Accessed 26 Feb 2018

  11. Elance.com. Elance Contractors (2013). https://www.elance.com/r/contractors/s-earningsSort/o-1/. Accessed 30 Jan 2013

  12. Gandia, E.: Freelance Industry Report: Data and Analysis of Freelancer Demographics, Earnings, Habits and Attitudes. International Freelancers Academy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elance.com. Elance Freelance Talent Report: A Look at the Demographics, Satisfaction Leveles and Expectations of Online Freelancers (2010). https://www.elance.com/p/freelance-talent-report.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2012

  14. Banker, R., Hwang, I.: Importance of measures of past performance: empirical evidence an quality of e-service providers. Contemp. Account. Res. 25(2), 307–337 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gefen, D., Carmel, E.: Is the world really flat? A look at offshoring in an online programming marketplace. MIS Q. 32(2), 367–384 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gefen, D., Carmel, E.: Why the first provider takes it all: the consequences of a low trust culture on pricing and ratings in online sourcing markets. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 604–618 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Assemi, B., Schlagwein, D.: Profile information and business outcomes of providers in electronic service marketplaces: an empirical investigation. In: 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Deakin University, Geelong, Australia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holthaus, C., Stock, R.M.: Facts vs. stories-assessment and conventional signals as predictors of freelancers’ performance in online labor markets. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Assemi, B., Schlagwein, D.: Provider feedback information and customer choice decisions on crowdsourcing marketplaces: evidence from two discrete choice experiments. Decis. Support Syst. 82, 1–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong, Y., Pavlou, P.A.: On buyer selection of service providers in online outsourcing platforms for IT services. Inf. Syst. Res. 28(3), 547–562 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Snir, E.M., Hitt, L.M.: Costly bidding in online markets for it services. Manage. Sci. 49(11), 1504–1520 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng, A., Hong, Y., Pavlou, P.: Value uncertainty and buyer contracting: evidence from online labor markets. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Fort Worth, Texas, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hong, Y., Pavlou, P.: An empirical investigation on provider pricing in online crowdsourcing markets for IT services. In: Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Orlando, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Diller, H.: Customer loyalty: fata morgana or realistic goal? Managing relationships with customers. In: Hennig-Thurau, T., Hansen, U. (eds.) Relationship Marketing: Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Customer Satisfaction and Customer Retention, pp. 29–48. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09745-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Gefen, D.: Customer loyalty in e-commerce. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 3(1), 27–51 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luarn, P., Lin, H.H.: A customer loyalty model for e-service context. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 4(4), 156–167 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zahedi, F.M., Bansal, G., Ische, J.: Success factors in cooperative online marketplaces: trust as the social capital and value generator in vendors—exchange relationships. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 20(4), 295–327 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Malone, T.W., Yates, J., Benjamin, R.I.: Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun. ACM 30(6), 484–497 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, J.Y., Wulf, E.: Move to depth: buyer–provider interactions in online service marketplaces. e-Service J. 7(1), 2–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, J.Y.: Online reverse auctions for outsourcing small software projects: determinants of vendor selection. e-Service J. 6(3), 40–55 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, R.E., Swinyard, W.R.: Information response models: an integrated approach. J. Mark. 46(1), 81–93 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jap, S.D.: Online reverse auctions: issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(4), 506–525 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pavlou, P.A., Dimoka, A.: The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Inf. Syst. Res. 17(4), 392–414 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gefen, D., Carmel, E.: Does reputation really signal potential success in online marketplaces, or is it only a trigger? In: Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS), Tel Aviv, Israel (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Radkevitch, U., van Heck, E., Koppius, O.: Portfolios of buyer-supplier exchange relationships in an online marketplace for IT services. Decis. Support Syst. 47(4), 297–306 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim, J.Y., Wulf, E.: Service encounters and relationships: buyer–supplier interactions in online service marketplaces. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), San Francisco, California, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Holthaus, C., Stock, R.M.: Good signals, bad signals: performance and trait implications of signaling in online labor markets. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Seoul, South Korea (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hu, X., Wu, G., Wu, Y., Zhang, H.: The effects of web assurance seals on consumers’ initial trust in an online vendor: a functional perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 48(2), 407–418 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Clemons, E.K., Wilson, J., Matt, C., Hess, T., Ren, F., Jin, F., Koh, N.S.: Global differences in online shopping behavior: understanding factors leading to trust. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 33(4), 1117–1148 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D.L., Rao, H.R.: Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: a longitudinal exploration. Inf. Syst. Res. 20(2), 237–257 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 27(1), 51–90 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Guo, W., Straub, D., Han, X., Zhang, P.: Understanding vendor preference in the crowdsourcing marketplace: the influence of vendor-task fit and swift trust. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 18(1), 1–17 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, J.-C., Chiang, M.-J.: Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: a social capital perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 47(4), 466–476 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Palvia, P.: The role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: a unified model. Inf. Manag. 46(4), 213–220 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gao, G., Greenwood, B.N., Agarwal, R., McCullough, J.S.: Vocal minority and silent majority: how do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Q. 39(3), 565–589 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dellarocas, C.: Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inf. Syst. Res. 16(2), 209–230 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manage. Sci. 49(10), 1407–1424 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yen, C.H., Lu, H.P.: Factors influencing online auction repurchase intention. Internet Res. 18(1), 7–25 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim, M.S., Ahn, J.H.: Comparison of trust sources of an online market-maker in the e-marketplace: buyer’s and seller’s perspectives. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 47(1), 84–94 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chiou, J.S., Wu, L.Y., Sung, Y.P.: Buyer satisfaction and loyalty intention in online auctions: online auction web site versus online auction seller. J. Serv. Manage. 20(5), 521–543 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Srinivasan, S.S., Anderson, R., Ponnavolu, K.: Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. J. Retail. 78(1), 41–50 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Qi, H., Mao, J.: Facilitating transactions on a crowdsourcing platform: a cognitive frame perspective. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Dublin, Ireland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lu, B., Hirschheim, R.: Online sourcing: investigations from service clients’ perspective. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Detroit, Michigan, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tomlinson-Keasey, C.: Opportunities and challenges posed by archival data sets. In: Funder, D.C., et al. (eds.) Studying Lives through Time: Personality and Development, pp. 65–92. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Elance.com. Elance Online Employment Report, Quarter 3 2011 (2011). https://www.elance.com/q/oer-test. Accessed 19 July 2012

  56. Misra, R.B.: Global IT outsourcing: metrics for success of all parties. J. Inf. Technol. Cases Appl. 6(3), 21–34 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., Jayatilaka, B.: Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 6–98 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shen, W.: Essays on Online Reviews: The Relationships between Reviewers, Reviews, and Product Sales, and the Temporal Patterns of Online Reviews (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hennig-Thurau, T., Hansen, U.: Relationship Marketing: Gaining Competitive Advantage through Customer Satisfaction and Customer Retention. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09745-8

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, pp. 295–336. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hair, J.F., Tomas, G., Hult, M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Urbach, N., Ahlemann, F.: Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 11(2), 5–40 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Haenlein, M., Kaplan, A.M.: A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis. Underst. Stat. 3(4), 283–297 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J.: Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 3.0. SmartPLS GmbH (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.R.: A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(2), 189–217 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Henseler, J., Fassott, G.: Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares, pp. 713–735. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_31

    Google Scholar 

  68. Henseler, J., Chin, W.W.: A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Struct. Eqn. Model. Multi. J. 17(1), 82–109 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. Neuman, W.L.: Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Boston, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., Cheung, C.M.K.: How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Q. 31(4), 705–737 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Conway, J., Lance, C.: What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. J. Bus. Psychol. 25(3), 325–334 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., Patil, A.: Common method variance in is research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manage. Sci. 52(12), 1865–1883 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, USA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lasrado, L.A., Lugmayr, A.: Crowdfunding in Finland: a new alternative disruptive funding instrument for businesses. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media, pp. 194–201. ACM, Tampere, Finland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zanatta, A.L., Machado, L.S., Pereira, G.B., Prikladnicki, R., Carmel, E.: Software crowdsourcing platforms. IEEE Softw. 33(6), 112–116 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Kanat, I.E., Hong, Y., Raghu, T.S.: Surviving in global online labor markets for IT services: a geo-economic analysis. Inf. Syst. Res. 29, 893 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ghezzi, A., Gabelloni, D., Martini, A., Natalicchio, A.: Crowdsourcing: a review and suggestions for future research. Int. J. Manage. Rev. 20(2), 343–363 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behrang Assemi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Assemi, B. (2019). The Role of Customer Retention in Business Outcomes of Online Service Providers. In: Mehandjiev, N., Saadouni, B. (eds) Enterprise Applications, Markets and Services in the Finance Industry. FinanceCom 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 345. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19037-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19037-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19036-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19037-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics