Skip to main content

Including Users in the Evaluation Process of Assistive Technology: Applied Methods and Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability and User Experience (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

This paper’s goal is to identify the different methods and techniques of assistive technology evaluation with users with disabilities, focusing on the post-design phase. As a method, we carried out a literature review regarding user-centered design and assistive technology. For the data analysis strategy, we followed three stages: 1- Descriptive analysis (based on the information provided by the authors); 2- Grouping methods and techniques by similarity; 3- Quantitative analysis (based on the incidence of the methods and techniques found. As a result, were identified 20 evaluation methods and techniques. The highest incidence were: survey, questionnaires, interviews and focus groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico [Internet] (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pereira, M.D.G.: A aplicabilidade do Design Inclusivo em projetos de Design (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henry, S.L., Law, C., Barnicle, K.: Adapting the design process to address more customers in more situations. In: Usability Professionals’ Association Annual Conference - UPA [Internet]. Nevada, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henry, S.L.: Just Ask: Integrating Accessibility Throughout Design. ET Lawton, Madison (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Hosking, I., Waller, S.: Inclusive design toolkit [Internet]. (2007). www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com

  6. Federici, S., Scherer, M.J., Borsci, S.: An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technol Disabil. 26(1), 27–38 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arthanat, S., Nochajski, S.M., Lenker, J.A., Bauer, S.M., Wu, Y.W.B.: Measuring usability of assistive technology from a multicontextual perspective: the case of power wheelchairs. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 63, 751–764 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuhrer, M.J., Services, H., Jutai, J., Scherer, M., Deruyter, F.: A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil. Rehabil. 25(22), 1243–1251 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hersh, M.: On modelling assistive technology systems - part 2: applications of the comprehensive assistive technology model. Technol. Disabil. 2(4), 251–270 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steel, E., Gelderblom, G.J., De Witte, L.P.: Development of an AT selection tool using the ICF model. Technol. Disabil. 23, 1–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maguire, M.: Methods to support human-centred design. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 55(4), 587–634 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephanidis, C.: Design for all. In: Jonas Lowgren, J.M., Carroll, M.H., Thomas Erickson, A.B., (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction [Internet]. 2nd (edn.) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brasil. Tecnologia Assistiva. Brasília, 138 p. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISO 9999- Assistive Products for Persons with Disability - Classification and Terminology. Brussels BE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smythe, K.C.A.S.: Proposta de método de obtenção de dados sobre comportamento informacional dos usuários no processo de wayfinding em ambientes hospitalares. Universidade Federal do Paraná (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newell, A.F.: User sensitive inclusive design. Interact Homme/Mach. Assist. 4–6, 18–20 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Federici, S., Scherer, M.J., Meloni, F., Corradi, F., Adya, M., Samant, D., et al.: Assessing individual functioning and disability. In: Stefano Federici, S.M. (ed.) Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Milton Park (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krinner, C.: How developers anticipate user behavior in the design of assistance systems. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychol and Cognitive Ergonomics - HCI, pp. 98–107. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Borges, L.C.L.F.: PD4CAT: método de design participativo para desenvolvimento customizado de alta tecnologia assistiva. Universidade de São Paulo (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Persad, U., Langdon P., Clarkson, P.J.: A framework for analytical inclusive, pp. 1–12 August, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  21. Federici, S., Scherer, M.: The assistive technology assessment process model and basic definitions. In: Stefano Federici, M.J.S. (ed.) Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook, 2nd edn, pp. 1–12. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guimarães, F.J., Luís, A., Faria, R., Marlena, L., Pagliuca, F.: Elaboração e validação de instrumento de avaliação de tecnologia assistiva * Elaboration and validation of an assistive technology assessment questionnaire. Rev. Eletr. Enferm. 17(2), 302–311 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hirai, Y., Morita, Y., Elokla, N.: Study on usability methodologies in the universal design process, pp. 1–12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO 9241210.: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koumpouros, Y.: A systematic review on existing measures for the subjective assessment of rehabilitation and assistive robot devices (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mortenson, W.B., Demers, L., Rushton, P.W., Auger, C.: Psychometric properties of a power mobility caregiver assistive technology outcome measure, pp. 1–9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Petrie, H., Bevan, N.: The evaluation of accessibility, usability and user experience (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ryan, S.E., Klejman, S., Gibson, B.E.: Measurement of the product attitudes of youth during the selection of assistive technology devices. Disabil. Rehabil. 8(1), 21–29 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special acknowledgments to UFPR and CNPq.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelli C. A. S. Smythe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Smythe, K.C.A.S., Adam, D.L., da Silva, C.T., Okimoto, M.L.L.R. (2020). Including Users in the Evaluation Process of Assistive Technology: Applied Methods and Techniques. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 972. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_92

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_92

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19134-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19135-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics