Skip to main content

Case Study 2: Normalization of Populist Terms in Political Discourse and Beyond: The ‘Unwillingness to Integrate’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies

Part of the book series: Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse ((PSDS))

  • 652 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter revisits research on a discursive shift during a political debate over demands for ‘punitive’ laws against migrants deemed ‘unwilling to integrate’. The original study found that the term became normalized in Austrian media through that debate. Interested in mediatized politics, the study focused on the argumentative structure of Resolution 3237/6, which sparked the debate, and the representation of migrants in related reporting. The revised study addresses this narrow empirical focus on a short-term discursive shift in one social field, adding corpora of parliamentary debates, court rulings, and legislation over 20 years. It finds prior usage of the term ‘unwillingness to integrate’, complicating the account of its normalization. It also extends argumentation analysis to the media, showing that normalization did not apply to all arguments equally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FWF-funded project P27153, The discursive construction of Austrian identity/ies 2015: A longitudinal perspective, began on January 1, 2015 and concluded on June 30, 2018.

References

  • Achtenhagen, Leona, and Friederike Welter. 2008. “Media Discourse in Entrepreneurship Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship, edited by Helle Neergard and John Parm Ulhoi, 193–215. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort. 2019. “Rechtsinformationssystem Des Bundes.” www.ris.bka.gv.at.

  • de Cillia, Rudolf. 2012. “Migration Und Sprache / n. Sprachenpolitik – Sprachförderung – Diskursanalyse.” In Migrations- Und Integrationsforschung – Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven, edited by Heinz Fassmann and Julia Dahlvik, 2., erweiterte und überarbeitete Auflage, 185–212. Wien: Vienna University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cillia, Rudolf, and Ruth Wodak, eds. 2009. Gedenken Im „Gedankenjahr“: Zur Diskursiven Konstruktion Österreichischer Identitäten Im Jubiläumsjahr 2005. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forchtner, Bernhard, Michał Krzyżanowski, and Ruth Wodak. 2013. “Mediatisation, Right-Wing Populism and Political Campaigning: The Case of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ).” In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, edited by M. Ekström and A. Tolson, 205–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, Jacob, and Wilhelm Grimm. 1965. Deutsches Wörterbuch, vol. 30. Stuttgrt and Leipzig: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, Siegfried. 2001. “Discourse and Knowledge: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of a Critical Discourse and Dispositive Analysis.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 32–62. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2013. “From Anti-Immigration and Nationalist Revisionism to Islamophobia: Continuities and Shifts in Recent Discourses and Patterns of Political Communication of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ).” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, edited by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral, 135–48. London: Bloomsburry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landtag Steiermark. 2015. “Resolution [Entschließungsantrag] 3237/6.” www.landtag.steiermark.at/cms/dokumente/ltpdf.11411653/na/11411653.pdf.

  • ORF. 2015. “Klare Worte von Voves Zu Terror in Frankreich.” Orf.At. August 1, 2015. www.steiermark.orf.at/news/stories/2690421.

  • Österreichische Bundesregierung. 1998. “Regierungsvorlage Zur Staatsbürgerschaftsgesetznovelle 1998” [Government Draft for the Citizenship Law Amendment 1998], 1283 BlgNR 20.GP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perchinig, Bernhard. 2010. “All You Need to Know to Become an Austrian: Naturalisation Policy and Citizenship Testing in Austria.” In A Re-definition of Belonging? Language and Integration Tests in Europe, edited by Ricky van Oers, Eva Ersbøll, and Theodora Kostakopoulou, 25–50. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Paschal. 2009. Making the News: Journalism and News Cultures in Europe. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddemann, Luise. 2005. “Zwischen Schlaf- Und Wachzuständen: Von Elben, Druiden, Nachtmaren, Kobolden Und Anderen Ungeheuerlichkeiten: Alpträume.” Vortrag Presented at the 55. Lindauer Psychotherapiewochen 2005, Lindau. April 21. http://www.lptw.de/archiv/vortrag/2005/reddemann.pdf.

  • Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2015. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheindorf, Markus. 2017. “Integration Durch Strafe? Die Normalisierung Paternalistischer Diskursfiguren Zur „Integrationsunwilligkeit“.” Zeitschrift Für Diskursforschung 2/2017: 182–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018a. “Disciplining the Unwilling. Normalisation of (Demands for) Punitive Measures Against Immigrants in Austrian Populist Discourse.” In Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse, edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan, 179–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. “Integration Durch Strafe? Integrationsunwilligkeit“ Im Politischen Diskurs. Vom Späten Erfolg Eines Umstrittenen Begriffes.” In Migration Und Integration – Wissenschaftliche Perspektiven Aus Österreich, edited by Jennifer Carvill Schellenbacher, Julia Dahlvik, Heinz Faßmann, and Christoph Reinprecht, 325–44. Wien: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; Vienna University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. “Discourse, Rhetorics and Populist Politics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, edited by Anna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheindorf, Markus, and Ruth Wodak. 2017. “Borders, Fences, and Limits—Protecting Austria from Refugees: Metadiscursive Negotiation of Meaning in the Current Refugee Crisis.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. April 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibelhofer, Paul. 2012. “From Health Check to Muslim Test: The Shifting Politics of Governing Migrant Masculinity.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 33 (3): 319–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2012.673474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Joachim, and Gerd Valchars. 2013a. Citizenship Law in Austria. European Union Democracy Observatory on Citizenship. Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Naturalisation Procedures for Immigrants in Austria. European Union Democracy Observatory on Citizenship. Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, Jesper. 2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (3): 228–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth. 2002a. “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Linguistik 36: 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. “Friend or Foe.” Language & Communication 22 (4): 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00022-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Pbk. ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. “Driving on the Right: The Austrian Case.” Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right. September 4, 2018. https://www.radicalrightanalysis.com/2018/04/09/driving-on-the-right-the-austrian-case/.

  • Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd ed. Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, Karin Liebhart, Klaus Hofstätter, and Maria Kargl. 1998. Zur Diskursiven Konstruktion Nationaler Identität. 1. Aufl. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 1349. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Rheindorf .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rheindorf, M. (2019). Case Study 2: Normalization of Populist Terms in Political Discourse and Beyond: The ‘Unwillingness to Integrate’. In: Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19369-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19369-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19368-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19369-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics