Abstract
Understanding the relationship between mock modular forms and quantum modular forms is a problem of current interest. Both mock and quantum modular forms exhibit modular-like transformation properties under suitable subgroups of \(\mathrm {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})\), up to nontrivial error terms; however, their domains (the upper half-plane \(\mathbb {H}\) and the rationals \(\mathbb {Q}\), respectively) are notably different. Quantum modular forms, originally defined by Zagier in 2010, have also been shown to be related to the diverse areas of colored Jones polynomials, meromorphic Jacobi forms, partial theta functions, vertex algebras, and more.
In this paper we study the (n + 1)-variable combinatorial rank generating function R n(x 1, x 2, …, x n;q) for n-marked Durfee symbols. These are n + 1 dimensional multi-sums for n > 1, and specialize to the ordinary two variable partition rank generating function when n = 1. The mock modular properties of R n when viewed as a function of \(\tau \in \mathbb {H}\), with q = e 2πiτ, for various n and fixed parameters x 1, x 2, ⋯ , x n, have been studied in a series of papers. Namely, by Bringmann and Ono when n = 1 and x 1 a root of unity; by Bringmann when n = 2 and x 1 = x 2 = 1; by Bringmann, Garvan, and Mahlburg for n ≥ 2 and x 1 = x 2 = ⋯ = x n = 1; and by the first and third authors for n ≥ 2 and the x j suitable roots of unity (1 ≤ j ≤ n).
The quantum modular properties of R 1 readily follow from existing results. Here, we focus our attention on the case n ≥ 2, and prove for any n ≥ 2 that the combinatorial generating function R n is a quantum modular form when viewed as a function of \(x \in \mathbb {Q}\), where q = e 2πix, and the x j are suitable distinct roots of unity.
Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Banff International Research Station (BIRS) and the Women in Numbers 4 (WIN4) workshop for the opportunity to initiate this collaboration. The first author is grateful for the support of National Science Foundation grant DMS-1449679, and the Simons Foundation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Here and throughout, as is standard in this subject for simplicity’s sake, we may slightly abuse terminology and refer to a function as a modular form or other modular object when in reality it must first be multiplied by a suitable power of q to transform appropriately.
References
G. E. Andrews Partitions, Durfee symbols, and the Atkin-Garvan moments of ranks, Invent. Math. 169 (2007), 37–73.
A. O. L. Atkin and H. P. F. Swinnerton-Dyer, Some properties of partitions, Proc. London Math. Soc. 66 (1954), 84–106.
K. Bringmann, On the explicit construction of higher deformations of partition statistics, Duke Math. J., 144 (2008), 195-233.
K. Bringmann, A. Folsom, K. Ono, and L. Rolen, Harmonic Maass forms and mock modular forms: theory and applications, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 64 (2017).
K. Bringmann, F. Garvan, and K. Mahlburg, Partition statistics and quasiweak Maass forms, Int. Math. Res. Notices, 1 (2009), 63–97.
K. Bringmann and K. Ono, Dyson’s ranks and Maass forms, Ann. of Math., 171 (2010), 419-449.
K. Bringmann and L. Rolen, Radial limits of mock theta functions, Res. Math. Sci. 2 (2015), Art. 17, 18 pp.
J. Bruiner and J. Funke, On two geometric theta lifts, Duke Math. J. 125 (2004), 45-90.
D. Choi, S. Lim, and R.C. Rhoades, Mock modular forms and quantum modular forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), no. 6, 2337–2349.
F. Dyson, Some guesses in the theory of partitions, Eureka (Cambridge) 8 (1944), 10–15.
A. Folsom, M-J. Jang, S. Kimport, and H. Swisher, Quantum modular forms and singular combinatorial series with repeated roots of unity, submitted. arXiv:1902.10698 [math.NT].
A. Folsom and S. Kimport Mock modular forms and singular combinatorial series, Acta Arith. 159 (2013), 257–297.
A. Folsom, K. Ono, and R.C. Rhoades, Mock theta functions and quantum modular forms, Forum Math. Pi 1 (2013), e2, 27 pp.
M. I. Knopp, Modular functions in analytic number theory, Markham Publishing Co., Chicago, Ill., 1970.
R. Lawrence and D. Zagier, Modular forms and quantum invariants of 3-manifolds, Asian J. Math. 3 (1) (1999) 93–107.
K. Ono, Unearthing the visions of a master: harmonic Maass forms and number theory, Current developments in mathematics, (2008), 347-454, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, (2009).
H. Rademacher, Topics in analytic number theory, Die Grundlehren der math. Wiss., Band 169, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1973).
D. Zagier, Ramanujan’s mock theta functions and their applications (after Zwegers and Ono-Bringmann), Séminaire Bourbaki Vol. 2007/2008, Astérisque 326 (2009), Exp. No. 986, vii-viii, 143-164 (2010).
D. Zagier, Quantum modular forms, Quanta of maths, 659-675, Clay Math. Proc., 11, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010.
S. Zwegers, Mock theta functions, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, 2002.
S. Zwegers, Multivariable Appell functions and nonholomorphic Jacobi forms, Res. Math. Sci. 6 (2019), 16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s) and The Association for Women in Mathematics
About this paper
Cite this paper
Folsom, A., Jang, MJ., Kimport, S., Swisher, H. (2019). Quantum Modular Forms and Singular Combinatorial Series with Distinct Roots of Unity. In: Balakrishnan, J., Folsom, A., Lalín, M., Manes, M. (eds) Research Directions in Number Theory. Association for Women in Mathematics Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19478-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19478-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19477-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19478-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)