Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation

  • 216 Accesses

Abstract

Why do parent–child argumentative interactions matter? What is the reason for such an interest? This chapter provides the reasons that motivated the study of parent–child argumentation with the aim to understand the function of this type of interactions. Focusing on the activity of family mealtime, in the first part, the chapter draws attention to the distinctive features of parent–child conversations. A second section of the chapter is devoted to discussing whether and, eventually, when children have the competence to construct arguments and engage in argumentative discussions with the aim to convince their parents to change opinion. In the last part of the chapter, research questions and structure of the volume are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arcidiacono, F., & Pontecorvo, C. (2009). Verbal conflict as a cultural practice in Italian family interactions between parents and preadolescents. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aukrust, V. G. (2002). “What did you do in school today?” Speech genres and tellability in multiparty family mealtime conversations in two cultures. In S. Blum-Kulka & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Talking to adults (pp. 55–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aukrust, V. G., & Snow, C. E. (1998). Narratives and explanations during mealtime conversations in Norway and the U.S. Language in Society, 27(2), 221–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, D. E. (1993). Explanations in low-income families’ mealtime conversations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(4), 489–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beals, D. E. (1997). Sources of support for learning words in conversation: Evidence from mealtimes. Journal of Child Language, 24(3), 673–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beals, D. E., & Snow, C. E. (1994). “Thunder is when the angels are upstairs bowling”: Narratives and explanations at the dinner table. Journal of Narrative Life History, 4(4), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beals, D. E., & Tabors, P. O. (1995). Arboretum, bureaucratic, and carbohydrates: Preschoolers’ exposure to rare vocabulary at home. First Language, 15(1), 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1997). Rhetorical and discursive analysis: How families talk about the royal family. In N. Hayes (Ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp. 39–54). London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). “You gotta know how to tell a story”: Telling, tales, and tellers in American and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language, 22(3), 361–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S. (1994). The dynamics of family dinner talk: Cultural contexts for children’s passages to adult discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(1), 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts: Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(2), 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2018). Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime conversations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 124–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bova, A., Arcidiacono, F., & Clément, F. (2017). The transmission of what is taken for granted in children’s socialization: The role of argumentation in family interactions. In C. Ilie & G. Garzone (Eds.), Argumentation across communities of practice: Multi-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 259–288). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brumark, Å. (2006). Non-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner-table conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1206–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumark, Å. (2008). “Eat your Hamburger!”—“No, I don’t Want to!” Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families. Argumentation, 22(2), 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Geer, B. (2004). “Don’t say it’s disgusting!” Comments on socio-moral behavior in Swedish families. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1705–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Geer, B., Tulviste, T., Mizera, L., & Tryggvason, M. T. (2002). Socialization in communication: Pragmatic socialization during dinnertime in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish families. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1757–1786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1988). The beginning of social understanding. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1987). Developmental of justification in disputes with mother and sibling. Developmental Psychology, 23(6), 791–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1988). Discourse coherence, participation structure and personal display in a family dinner table conversation. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 4(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentative discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32(2–3), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiese, B. H., Foley, K. P., & Spagnola, M. (2006). Routine and ritual elements in family mealtimes: Contexts for child well-being and family identity. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgakopoulou, A. (2002). Greek children and familiar narratives in family contexts: En route to cultural performance. In S. Blum-Kulka & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Talking to adults (pp. 33–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. F., & Ross, H. S. (1982). The social nature of early conflict. Child Development, 53(1), 105–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 99–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, S., & Hester, S. (2010). Conversational actions and category relations: An analysis of a children’s argument. Discourse Studies, 12(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C. J., & McWilliam, D. (2001). Peer argument in educational settings: Variations due to socio-economic status, gender and activity context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(1–2), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. T. (1979). Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist, 81(4), 773–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(22), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245–1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurier, E., & Wiggins, S. (2011). Finishing the family meal. The interactional organisation of satiety. Appetite, 56(1), 53–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2009). The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference, 20(8), 558–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Tartas V., & Iannaccone, A. (2009). Psychosocial processes in argumentation. In N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and Education (pp. 67–90). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevat-Gal, R. (2002). Cognitive expressions and humorous phrases in family discourse as reflectors and cultivators of cognition. In S. Blum-Kulka & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Talking to adults (pp. 181–208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (2006). The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., Smith, R., & Taylor, C. (1989). Detective stories at dinnertime: Problem-solving through co-narration. Cultural Dynamics, 2(2), 238–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsolini, M. (1993). Dwarfs do not shoot: An analysis of children’s justifications. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3–4), 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Singer, J. D., & Snow, C. E. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development, 76(4), 763–782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paugh, A. L. (2005). Learning about work at dinnertime: language socialization in dual-earner American families. Discourse & Society, 16(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, E. M., Grolnick, W. S., & Price, C. E. (2005). The role of parents in how children approach achievement. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 229–278). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, C., & Fasulo, A. (1997). Learning to argue in family shared discourse: The reconstruction of past events. In L. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 406–442). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H., Ross, M., Stein, N., & Trabasso, T. (2006). How siblings resolve their conflicts: The importance of first offers, planning, and limited opposition. Child Development, 77(6), 1730–1745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rundquist, S. (1992). Indirectness: A gender study of flouting Grice’s maxims. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(5), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2010). Argumentation and reasoning. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 137–176). Dordrecht: Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shantz, C. U. (1987). Conflicts between children. Child Development, 58(2), 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slomkowski, C. L., & Dunn, J. (1992). Arguments and relationships within the family: Differences in young children’s disputes with mother and sibling. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 919–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., & Beals, D. E. (2006). Mealtime talk that supports literacy development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speier, M. (1976). The child as conversationalist: Some culture contact features of conversational interactions between adults and children. In M. Hammersley & P. Woods (Eds.), The process of schooling: A sociological reader (pp. 98–103). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R. (2001). The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion and negotiation. Discourse Processes, 32(2–3), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., Bernas, R. S., Calicchia, D. J., & Wright, A. (1995). Understanding and resolving arguments: The dynamics of negotiation. In B. Britton & A. G. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding (pp. 257–287). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1990). I win—You lose: The development of argumentative thinking. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 265–290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1993). A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning. Argumentation, 7(2), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). Children’s understanding of stories: A basis for moral judgment and dilemma resolution. In C. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal processes in children: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 161–188). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tesla, C., & Dunn, J. (1992). Getting along or getting your own way: The development of young children’s use of argument in conflicts with mother and sibling. Social Development, 1(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulviste, T., Mizera, L., De Geer, B., & Tryggvason, M. T. (2002). Regulatory comments as tools of family socialization: A comparison of Estonian, Swedish and Finnish mealtime interaction. Language in Society, 31(5), 655–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizman, Z., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 265–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2004). Good for “you”: Generic and individual healthy eating advice in family mealtimes. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 535–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2013). The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 489–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy

    Antonio Bova

Authors
  1. Antonio Bova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Bova .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bova, A. (2019). Introduction. In: The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation