Skip to main content

Moving Forward in Fostering Humour: Towards Training Lighter Forms of Humour in Multicultural Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theoretical Approaches to Multi-Cultural Positive Psychological Interventions

Abstract

The following theoretical position paper has the aim to outline two important future directions of humour intervention research. Firstly, existing humour trainings have not differentiated explicitly between different uses of humour or humour that may be virtuous or not. Within the realm of Positive Psychology, all virtuous forms of humour need to be identified and interventions developed that aim at fostering these benevolent/lighter forms. Secondly, most humour trainings have been adapted and conducted in one cultural context. Future trainings should consider cross-cultural perspectives to allow for comparative research and practice. Thus, the current paper first gives an overview on the extant literature on the distinction between lighter and darker forms of humour, as well as showing how humour can serve the virtues proposed by Peterson and Seligman (2004). Then, we elaborate on the findings on humour and well-being, as well as findings on existing humour interventions. The second section starts with open questions and hypotheses on how a new generation of trainings targeting lighter forms of humour could look like. Then, we discuss (potential) cultural differences in humour and how this may affect the design of interventions. When aiming for cross-cultural adaptations of the same humour program, several challenges have to be overcome, such as the term “humour” not having the same meaning in every culture, and cultural rules on what can be laughed at.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The distinction between lighter and darker forms of humour as used in this chapter focuses on the intention of the person producing or uttering the humour for the following reasons: Somebody who produces humour may have a good intention or not. Within PPIs, humour trainings should focus on good-intended humour that aims at fostering positive emotions, relationships and good character (i.e., lighter styles of humour). Yet, whether this well-intended humour is received as such depends on the context and the receiver. Thus, even the best intended benevolent humorous remark could potentially be taken negatively under certain conditions (e.g., when the person the humour is addressed to has a fear of being laughed at, cf. Ruch, Hofmann, Platt, & Proyer, 2014 for a review)—but this is not under the humourist’s control. Therefore, classifying humour by its outcome would make any kind of classification attempt impossible, as consequences may vary with every change of condition, social context and receiver. For this reason, we focus on distinguishing lighter and darker forms of humour based on the intentions of the individuals producing and communicating the humour.

  2. 2.

    The term “comic styles” is used to acknowledge the origin of these eight humour styles.

References

  • Andress, W. C., Hoshino, M., & Rorke, S. C. (2010, July). Empirical evidence for therapeutic laughter courses on a university campus. Paper presented at the 35th Annual National Wellness Conference, Stevens Point, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009a). How virtuous is humor? What we can learn from current instruments. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 528–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009b). How virtuous is humor? Evidence from everyday behavior. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 395–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beh-Pajooh, A., Jahangiri, M., & Zahrakar, K. (2010). Humor skills training and reducing depression in patients with spinal chord injury. Journal of Iranian Psychologists, 6, 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H., Lampert, M. D., & Nelson, A. J. (1996). Sense of humor and styles of everyday humorous conduct. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 273–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S., & Caltabiano, N. J. (2011). Promoting emotional well-being through the use of humour. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. (1990). Ethnic humor around the world: A comparative analysis. Indiana: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1944). National differences in “sense of humor”: Three experimental and statistical studies. Character & Personality, A Quarterly for Psychodiagnostic & Allied Studies, 13, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg, I., Buchkremer, G., Bartels, M., & Wild, B. (2011). Implementation of a manual-based training of humor abilities in patients with depression: A pilot study. Psychiatry Research, 186, 454–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. A., & Ford, T. E. (2008). Disparagement humour: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 21, 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/humour.2008.014.

  • Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence for their potential in enhancing well-being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1241–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9380-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, S. & Ruch, W. (2019). From four to nine styles: An update on individual differences in humor. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, R. D., Junglas, K., Konradt, B., & Jonitz, M. F. (2010). Humortherapie bei alten Menschen mit einer Depression. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung [Humor therapy in the depressed elderly. Results of an empirical study]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 43, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (2010). Leviathan. In I. Shapiro (Ed.), Leviathan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (original work published in 1651).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, J. (2018). Putting “Laughing at yourself” to the test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, Special Issue Festschrift for Paul McGhee: Humor Across the Lifespan, Theory, Measurement, and Applications, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, J., Heintz, S., Pang, D., & Ruch, W. (2019). Differential relationships of light and darker forms of humor with mindfulness. Applied Research in Quality of Life, Special Issue “Character Strengths, Well-Being, and Health in Educational and Vocational Settings”. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9698-9.

  • Hofmann, J., Platt, T., & Ruch, W. (2017). Laughter and smiling in 16 positive emotions. IEEE Transactions in Affective Computing, Special Issue on Laughter, 8, 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2737000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konradt, B., Hirsch, R. D., Jonitz, M. F., & Junglas, K. (2013). Evaluation of a standardized humor group in a clinical setting: A feasibility study for older patients with depression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(8), 850–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. N., & Sullivan, E. (2013). Sense of humor across cultures: A comparison of British, Australian and American respondents. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humour: An integrative approach. London, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humour and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humour styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1996). Health, healing and the amuse system: Humor as survival training. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (2010). Humor as survival training for a stressed-out world: The 7 humor habits program. Bloomington, IN: Author House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendiburo-Seguel, A., Páez, D., & Martínez-Sánchez, F. (2015). Humor styles and personality: A meta-analysis of the relation between humor styles and the big five personality traits. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J., Glew, D. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humour in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (2010). Comic vices and comic virtues. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2010.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, L., & Ruch, W. (2011). Humor and strengths of character. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.592508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemiec, R. M. (2013). Mindfulness and character strengths. Boston: Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Character strengths interventions: A field guide for practitioners. Boston: Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papousek, I., Ruch, W., Rominger, C., Kindermann, E., Scheidl, K., Schulter, G., … Weiss, E. M. (2017). The use of bright and dark types of humour is rooted in the brain. Scientific Reports, 7, 42967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papousek, I., & Schulter, G. (2008). Effects of a mood enhancing intervention on subjective well-being and cardiovascular parameters. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, A. C., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2013). Positive intervention: Past, present, future. In T. B. Kashdan & J. Ciarrochi (Eds.), Mindfulness, acceptance, and positive psychology: The seven foundations for wellbeing (pp. 140–165). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, M., & Findlay, B. (2016). The development and validation of the Humor at Work (HAW) scale. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0097.

  • Roeckelein, J. E. (2002). The psychology of humour: A reference guide and annotated bibliography. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. (2001). The perception of humour. In A. W. Kaszniak (Ed.), Emotion, qualia, and consciousness (pp. 410–425). Tokyo, Japan: Word Scientific Publisher.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. (2004). Humor. In C. P. Peterson & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (pp. 583–598). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. (2012). Towards a new structural model of the sense of humor: Preliminary findings. Technical reports of the AAAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Forabosco, G. (1996). A cross-cultural study of humor appreciation: Italy and Germany. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2016). The virtue gap in humour: Exploring benevolent and corrective humour. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2017). Experimentally manipulating items informs on the (limited) construct and criterion validity of the humor styles questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (in press). On the dimensionality of humorous conduct and their association with humor traits and behaviors. HUMOR—International Journal of Humor Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Heintz, S., Platt, T., Wagner, L., & Proyer, R. T. (2018). Broadening humour: Comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Frontiers in Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Hofmann, J. (2012). A temperament approach to humour. In P. Gremigni (Ed.), Humour and health promotion (pp. 79–113). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Hofmann, J. (2017). Fostering humour. In C. Proctor (Ed.), Positive psychology interventions in practice (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51787-2_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Hofmann, J., Platt, T., & Proyer, R. T. (2014). The state-of-the art in gelotophobia research: A review and some theoretical extensions. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 27, 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/humour-2013-0046.

  • Ruch, W., Hofmann, J., Rusch, S., & Stolz, H. (2018). The impact of the 7 Humor Habits Program on the sense of humor and satisfaction with life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, Festschrift for Paul McGhee: Humor Across the Lifespan, Theory, Measurement, and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2015). Mapping strengths into virtues: The relation of the 24 VIA-strengths to six ubiquitous virtues. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 460. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Wagner, L., & Heintz, S. (2018). Humour, the PEN model of personality, and subjective well-being: Support for differential relationships with eight comic styles. Rivista Italiana di Studi sull’Umorismo, 1(1), 31–43. Retrieved from www.risu.biz.

  • Rugenstein, K. (2014). Humor: Die Verflüssigung des Subjekts bei Hippokrates, Jean Paul, Kierkegaard und Freud. Paderborn: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassenrath, S. (2001). Humor und Lachen als Stressbewältigungsstrategie [Humor and laughter as coping mechanism] (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Hidding, W. (1963). Europäische Schlüsselwörter: Humour und Witz (Band I) [European keywords: Humour and wit (Vol. 1)]. Munich, Germany: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2018). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1–18. Advance online publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.

  • Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2015, accepted for publication). Humor-based online positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled long-term trial. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(6), 584–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2016a). Who profits from humor-based positive psychology interventions? The moderating effects of personality traits and sense of humor. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00821.

  • Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2016b). How do positive psychology interventions work? A short-term placebo-controlled humor-based study on the role of the time focus. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Hofmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hofmann, J., Ruch, W. (2019). Moving Forward in Fostering Humour: Towards Training Lighter Forms of Humour in Multicultural Contexts. In: Van Zyl, L., Rothmann Sr., S. (eds) Theoretical Approaches to Multi-Cultural Positive Psychological Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20583-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics