Abstract
In this chapter we present the related work identified with the main goal of this monograph. In crowds, cultural and personality influence can be considered in attributes such as interpersonal spaces, speeds of pedestrians, collision avoidance, and formation of groups of people in the crowd, among others. Several researches by Zhan et al. (MVA 19(5–6):345–357, 2008), Weina et al. (IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(5):1003–1016, 2012), Solmaz et al. (IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(10):2064–2070, 2012), Chandran et al. (Identifying social groups in pedestrian crowd videos. In: ICAPR, pp 1–6, 2015) focus on group identification through computational vision for information extraction. Some group detection and behavior work are presented in Sect. 4.1. In addition to information about individuals and their groups, fundamental diagrams can also be used to infer culture. The fundamental diagrams describe the relationship between velocity, density, and flow of individuals in multitudes, as described in Sect. 2.6 . Section 4.2 presents some work that use FDs in crowds by Cao et al. (Physica A Stat Mech Appl 506:661–670, 2018), Helbing et al. (Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 75(4 Pt 2):046, 109, 2007), Seyfried et al. (Enhanced empirical data for the fundamental diagram and the flow through bottlenecks. In: Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2008. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 145–156, 2010), Wolinski et al. (Comput Graph Forum 33(2):303–312, 2014), Narang et al. (PLoS One 10(4):1–17, 2015), Best et al. (Densesense: interactive crowd simulation using density-dependent filters. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on computer animation, SCA ’14. Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, pp 97–102, 2015). Section 4.3 shows some research about personality by Goldberg (From ace to zombie: some explorations in the language of personality, chap 6. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 203–234, 1982) and emotion traits by Ortony et al. (The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990). Finally, Sect. 4.4 addresses some work that seek to extract or simulate cultural aspects by Hofstede et al. (Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, vol 2. McGraw-Hill, London, 1991) in crowds by Chattaraj et al. (Adv Complex Syst 12(03):393–405, 2009), Guy et al. (Simulating heterogeneous crowd behaviors using personality trait theory. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, SCA ’11. ACM, New York, pp 43–52, 2011), Lala et al. (Towards a virtual environment for capturing behavior in cultural crowds. In: 2011 sixth international conference on digital information management, Melbourne, Australia, pp 310–315, 2011), Kaminka and Fridman (Simulating urban pedestrian crowds of different cultures. Tech. Rep. 3, 2018). Also the work performed by Sorokowska et al. (J Cross Cult Psychol 48:577–592, 2017), which investigate the preferred distance that a pedestrian keeps from others in several countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this book, it was considered that the density 〈Φ〉 (amount of people p∕m 2) can be: low, when 〈Φ〉≤ 1.5, medium, when 1.5 < 〈Φ〉≤ 4 and high, when 〈Φ〉 > 4. These values were empirically defined
References
Berg J, Guy SJ, Lin MC, Manocha D (2009) Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. In: Pradalier C, Siegwart R, Hirzinger G (eds) Robotics research. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 3–19
Best A, Narang S, Curtis S, Manocha D (2014) Densesense: interactive crowd simulation using density-dependent filters. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on computer animation, SCA ’14. Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, pp 97–102. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2849517.2849534
Cao S, Seyfried A, Zhang J, Holl S, Song W (2017) Fundamental diagrams for multidirectional pedestrian flows. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp 2017:33404–33412
Cao S, Lian L, Chen M, Yao M, Song W, Fang Z (2018) Investigation of difference of fundamental diagrams in pedestrian flow. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 506:661–670
Chandran A, Poh LA, Vadakkepat P (2015) Identifying social groups in pedestrian crowd videos. In: ICAPR, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAPR.2015.7050677
Chattaraj U, Seyfried A, Chakroborty P (2009) Comparison of pedestrian fundamental diagram across cultures. Adv Complex Syst 12(03):393–405. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525909002209
Davis KL, Panksepp J (2011) The brain’s emotional foundations of human personality and the affective neuroscience personality scales. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:1946–1958
Deng Z, Vahdat A, Hu H, Mori G (2016) Structure inference machines: recurrent neural networks for analyzing relations in group activity recognition. In: The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas
Feng L, Bhanu B (2015) Understanding dynamic social grouping behaviors of pedestrians. IEEE J Sel Topics Signal Process 9(2):317–329. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2365765
Flötteröd G, Lämmel G (2015) Bidirectional pedestrian fundamental diagram. Transp Res Part B Methodol 71:194–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.001, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261514001908
Goldberg LR (1982) From ace to zombie: some explorations in the language of personality, chap 6. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 203–234
Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative “description of personality”: the Big-Five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(6):1216–1229
Guy SJ, Kim S, Lin MC, Manocha D (2011) Simulating heterogeneous crowd behaviors using personality trait theory. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on computer animation, SCA ’11. ACM, New York, pp 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/2019406.2019413
Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension. In: A doubleday anchor book, vol 609. Random House, Inc., Doubleday, Garden City
Hausdorff F (1962) Set theory. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York
Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407(6803):487–490. https://doi.org/10.1038/35035023
Helbing D, Johansson A, Al-Abideen HZ (2007) Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 75(4 Pt 2):046, 109
Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (1991) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, vol 2. McGraw-Hill, London
Ibrahim MS, Muralidharan S, Deng Z, Vahdat A, Mori G (2016) A hierarchical deep temporal model for group activity recognition. In: The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas
Kaminka GA, Fridman N (2018) Simulating urban pedestrian crowds of different cultures. Tech. Rep. 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3102302
Lala D, Thovuttikul S, Nishida T (2011) Towards a virtual environment for capturing behavior in cultural crowds. In: 2011 6th international conference on digital information management, Melbourn, Australia, pp 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2011.6093362
Narang S, Best A, Curtis S, Manocha D (2015) Generating pedestrian trajectories consistent with the fundamental diagram based on physiological and psychological factors. PLoS One 10(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117856
Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1990) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, New York
Palanisamy G, Manikandan TT (2017) Group behaviour profiling for detection of anomaly in crowd. In: International conference on technical advancements in computers and communications (ICTACC), IEEE, Melmaruvathur, India, pp 11–15
Saifi L, Boubetra A, Nouioua F (2016) An approach for emotions and behavior modeling in a crowd in the presence of rare events. Adapt Behav 24:428–445
Seyfried A, Schadschneider A (2008) Fundamental diagram and validation of crowd models. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on cellular automata for research and industry, ACRI ’08. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79992-4_77
Seyfried A, Steffen B, Klingsch W, Boltes M (2005) The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp 10:10002–10015
Seyfried A, Boltes M, Kähler J, Klingsch W, Portz A, Rupprecht T, Schadschneider A, Steffen B, Winkens A (2010) Enhanced empirical data for the fundamental diagram and the flow through bottlenecks. In: Klingsch WWF, Rogsch C, Schadschneider A, Schreckenberg M (eds) Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2008. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 145–156
Shao J, Kang K, Loy CC, Wang X (2015) Deeply learned attributes for crowded scene understanding. In: 2015 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), Boston, pp 4657–4666. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299097
Solera F, Calderara S, Cucchiara R (2013) Structured learning for detection of social groups in crowd. In: 2013 10th IEEE international conference on advanced video and signal based surveillance, Krakow, Poland, pp 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/AVSS.2013.6636608
Solmaz B, Moore BE, Shah M (2012) Identifying behaviors in crowd scenes using stability analysis for dynamical systems. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(10):2064–2070. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.123
Sorokowska A, Sorokowski P, Hilpert P, Cantarero K, Frackowiak T, Ahmadi K, Alghraibeh AM, Aryeetey R, Bertoni A, Bettache K, Blumen S, Błażejewska M, Bortolini T, Butovskaya M, C FN, Cetinkaya H, Cunha D, David D, David OA, Dileym FA, Espinosa ACD, Donato S, Dronova D, Dural S, Fialová J, Fisher M, Gulbetekin E, Akkaya AH, Hromatko I, Iafrate R, Iesyp M, James B, Jaranovic J, Jiang F, Kimamo CO, Kjelvik G, Koç F, Laar A, Lopes FA, Macbeth G, Marcano NM, Martinez R, Mesko N, Molodovskaya N, Moradi K, Motahari Z, Mühlhauser A, Natividade JC, Ntayi J, Oberzaucher E, Ojedokun O, Omar-Fauzee MSB, Onyishi IE, Paluszak A, Portugal A, Razumiejczyk E, Realo A, Relvas AP, Rivas M, Rizwan M, Salkičević S, Sarmány-Schuller I, Schmehl S, Senyk O, Sinding C, Stamkou E, Stoyanova S, Šukolová D, Sutresna N, Tadinac M, Teras A, Ponciano ELT, Tripathi R, Tripathi N, Tripathi M, Uhryn O, Yamamoto ME, Yoo G, Pierce JD (2017) Preferred interpersonal distances: a global comparison. J Cross Cult Psychol 48:577–592
Weina G, Robert TC, Barry R (2012) Vision-based analysis of small groups in pedestrian crowds. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(5):1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.176 http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.176
Wolinski D, Guy SJ, Olivier AH, Lin M, Manocha D, Pettré J (2014) Parameter estimation and comparative evaluation of crowd simulations. Comput Graph Forum 33(2):303–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12328
Zhan B, Monekosso D, Remagnino P, Velastin SA, Xu L (2008) Crowd analysis: a survey. MVA 19(5–6):345–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-008-0132-4
Zhou B, Tang X, Zhang H, Wang X (2014) Measuring crowd collectiveness. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36(8):1586–1599. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2300484
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Favaretto, R.M., Musse, S.R., Costa, A.B. (2019). A State-of-the-Art Review. In: Emotion, Personality and Cultural Aspects in Crowds. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22078-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22078-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22077-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22078-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)