Skip to main content

Abstract

The first two sections of this chapter present the scale of Greece’s problems with tax collection and the nature and basic characteristics of Greece’s public revenue administration at the onset of the crisis. The reform that this book examines is radical in nature in comparison to the status quo ante as well as much of Greece’s public administration. Yet it came about in a country that, according to the prevailing wisdom, has limited reform capacity. The nature of this limited reform capacity and the barriers to reform are examined in the third section of this chapter. The fourth section presents the landscape of the main models of public revenue administrations as they exist in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. The final section brings together the key elements of these sections and outlines the book’s puzzle and central argument. Briefly put, the question that we seek to answer is this: what accounts for the switch from the previous model of direct ministerial control to an independent authority that operates at arm’s length from the government in a country that has limited reform capacity? How did reform-averse Greece come to enact and implement this radically different model—indeed one whose effectiveness and efficiency are not certain and is used by a minority of European Union (EU) member states?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This does not mean that tax evasion is evenly distributed across social groups. Pensioners and salaried workers would normally find it difficult or impossible to avoid paying income tax when paid via payroll. On the contrary, path-breaking new research estimates that ‘43–45% of self-employed income goes unreported and thus untaxed. For 2009, this implies 28.2 billion euros of unreported income, implying forgone tax revenues of over 11 billion euros or 30% of the deficit’ (Artavanis et al. 2016).

  2. 2.

    This is the view of Prof. Euclid Tsakalotos (Minister of Finance  in the post-2015 Tsipras administrations) and Fragkiskos Koutentakis , an academic economist who was also one of the Tsipras administration’s top officials in the Ministry of Finance and subsequent head of the Hellenic Parliament’s Budget Office (Tsakalotos 2010: 10, Figs. 2 and 3; Koutentakis 2018).

  3. 3.

    The two measures relate to the level of taxation and the extent to which a country’s public revenue administration performs close to, above, or below its potential.

  4. 4.

    An average of approximately 1.83 percentage points has been added to the country’s public deficit every election year between 1974 and 1993 (Thomadakis 1997: 55).

  5. 5.

    Statement made at a meeting held in London in January 2018 under the Chatham House rule.

  6. 6.

    On its structure at the beginning of the crisis, see Nanopoulos (2010).

  7. 7.

    Two examples from the 2000s (pre-crisis) are Professors Nikos Christodoulakis and George Alogoskoufis . Two examples from the post-2008 period are Professors Yiannis Stournaras (currently Governor of the Bank of Greece ) and Ghikas Hardouvelis .

  8. 8.

    One telling example is the replacement of all heads of units, deputy directors and directors in the public revenue administration in October 2012. To do so, Finance Minister Yiannis Stournaras in the ‘Grand Coalition’ government led by PM Antonis Samaras changed the selection process and replaced it with one that required only his decision for these appointments to take place (Ta Nea 2012a). He was not the first one to try to do so even after the onset of the crisis (Hadjinikolaou 2011).

  9. 9.

    Indeed, a former government minister went as far as to cite the specific example of Andreas Papandreou who allegedly ordered tax inspections against media companies as a reaction to unfavourable coverage (interview, Athens, 15 February 2017).

  10. 10.

    Appointments to key posts in the public revenue administration were not only based on party political criteria. A range of other influences that were not in the public interest applied. For example, a former government minister mentioned the influence of senior officials of the Greek Orthodox Church in some parts of the country (interview with former government minister, Athens, 15 February 2017).

  11. 11.

    This was calculated on the basis of sectoral coefficients (Perry et al. 2005: 49).

  12. 12.

    Indeed, several examples demonstrate the opposite and include the modernisation of family law (including the introduction of civil marriage) in the 1980s, the liberalisation of banking, the partial privatisation of public utilities and the establishment of an array of independent agencies in the 1990s. In his examination of reform between 1990 and 2008 Christodoulakis finds a strong and positive correlation between growth on the one hand and market reforms on the other (Christodoulakis 2012: 113).

  13. 13.

    The ‘Greek paradox ’ is the difference between promise and performance (Allison and Nicolaïdis 1997).

  14. 14.

    On the concept of rent-seeking, see Krueger (1974).

  15. 15.

    Greece has never had a productive middle class (Kondylis 2011). The local ‘comprador’ bourgeoisie directed foreign capital not towards manufacturing but services (e.g. shipping, commerce and banking) and sat next to a large agrarian sector and a myriad of labour-intensive, low added-value family-owned and family-run small and medium-sized firms as well as a large black market (Mouzelis 1978: 20–21; Zambarloukou 2006: 215).

  16. 16.

    This is so not only in the economic sense but also in terms of civil liberties in a country that was a democracy only in formal terms until 1967 (Tsoukalas 1969).

  17. 17.

    Featherstone notes the example of the transfer of a senior official of the state’s land service in Aitoloakarnania, as a result of the pressure exerted by illegal builders on the Ministry of Finance in July 2007 (Featherstone 2008: 17).

  18. 18.

    A good example is the lack of a genuinely autonomous trade union movement.

  19. 19.

    An emblematic example is the close link that tied the socialist PASOK with ADEDY  (Ανώτατη Διοίκηση Ενώσεων Δημοσίων Yπαλλήλων—Supreme Command of Civil Servants’ Unions), the country’s peak trade union in the public sector.

  20. 20.

    This goes some way towards explaining the Greeks’ mistrust of the state, which several previous generations had experienced as little more than an apparatus that oppressed them. This perception seems to confirm Rothstein’s argument that highlights ‘the importance of impartial, un-corrupt and fair government institutions for generating social trust’ (Rothstein 2013).

  21. 21.

    Initial attempts at state building through the centralisation of power tried to reduce the power of local elites but the establishment of captive democratic institutions ended up reinforcing it (Kalyvas 2015: 53).

  22. 22.

    The introduction of liberal market elements aiming to improve Greece’s competitiveness under the bailout agreements, the argument has been made that the country is left with the worst of both worlds, that is, suboptimal economic performance as well as diluted social cohesion (Kornelakis and Voskeritsian 2014).

  23. 23.

    Low trust also helps explain the prevalence of very small, family-run firms in Greece (Lyberaki and Tsakalotos 2002: 101) .

  24. 24.

    Lavdas uses the term ‘disjointed corporatism’ to describe Greece’s system of interest intermediation (Lavdas 1997).

  25. 25.

    One example from the immediate pre-crisis period is the treatment meted out to former Prime Minister Costas Simitis (a socialist) when he warned the ND (Nea Dimokratia) government in 2008 that the country’s public finances were in need of deep reforms in the absence of which the IMF would need to be called in.

  26. 26.

    The reform of pensions is a case in point (Tinios 2012: 127).

  27. 27.

    A case in point is ND’s effort to veto the appointment of the board of Greece’s National Broadcasting Council so as to prevent the SYRIZA -ANEL (Coalition of the Radical Left/Independent Greeks) government from radically reforming TV channel licensing.

  28. 28.

    Clientelistic recruitment has played its part in undermining the first socialist government’s attempt to place public enterprises under ‘social control ’ (Lyberaki and Tsakalotos 2002: 104) .

  29. 29.

    The examples relate to both PASOK and ND administrations, that is, the two parties that have governed Greece almost uninterruptedly between 1974 and 2015.

  30. 30.

    This is what philosophers call ‘speech acts’ (Green 2017; Smith 1990).

  31. 31.

    Just like many other collective endeavours in Greece, most of them do not operate democratically; rather, they are dominated by the image or reality of a charismatic leader, a figure to be treated like a Messiah. Clientelism operates within these highly personalist parties too, not only between parties and voters (Bermeo 2002: 219). PASOK under Andreas Papandreou is a good example (Spourdalakis 1998).

  32. 32.

    This is not due to the lack of funding. In the run-up to the crisis, all major parties were receiving significant amounts of money from the state, bank loans and other (not always legal) sources. An indication of how much money had been channelled to the two largest parties (Nea Dimokratia and PASOK) is the fact that, together, they owe more than 400 million euros to various Greek banks.

  33. 33.

    This is the core definition of politicisation too (Peters and Pierre 2004: 2).

  34. 34.

    For one example that relates to decentralisation (see Sotiropoulos 2012: 20). The aforementioned example of privatisation is another one (Pagoulatos 2001: 133–134).

  35. 35.

    This means that the emphasis of administrative action is not on problem solving but how the relevant officials can tick the box and avoid being accused of not acting as they should in terms of the requisite formalities.

  36. 36.

    As a leading constitutional lawyer points out, Greek courts have been too eager to stretch the notion of unconstitutionality of some legal provisions in a way that has blocked reforms, though it is fair to say that some provisions of the MoUs are highly problematic from the legal point of view (Alivizatos 2010).

  37. 37.

    Between 1843 and 2001 the percentage of ministers who had a law degree fluctuated between 29.4% (1936–1941) and 68.2% (1946–1967) (Sotiropoulos and Bourikos 2002, Table 7b, 187).

  38. 38.

    Administrative reform is a good case in point (Spanou 2012: 190).

  39. 39.

    Koutsoukis has counted 589 ministers between 1946 and 1976 (cited in Sotiropoulos and Bourikos 2002: 157).

  40. 40.

    This happens in a country where draconian laws coexist with lax enforcement or as Tsoukalas notes, a country where laws are not always seen as limits that ought to be respected but as obstacles that need to be overcome (Tsoukalas 1993: 23). No wonder a major international comparison of the transposition of EU employment law has classified Greece in the ‘world of neglect’ (Falkner et al. 2005). This attitude towards the law is one of the signs of uncivic culture, alongside a hierarchically organised public life and corruption (Putnam 1993: 115).

  41. 41.

    A recent example of their self-serving attitude as well as power even during the crisis is quite telling. Since 1997 all academic doctors who teach in Greek public universities while also working in their own private practices are obliged to pay into their employing university’s research account a 7% levy on their private practice’s gross turnover. Those teaching in dentistry schools have been refusing to do so and even went on strike—causing major problems for their students—claiming that after nearly two decades of failing to pay the levy, the corresponding amount had become very big, exceeding 100,000 euros in some cases. Education minister Costas Gavroglou in the SYRIZA -ANEL government practically caved in (so as to bring about the end of the strike) and agreed to drop the claims regarding the first 15 years of the law’s operation and offered them the possibility of paying the remainder in instalments. However, Finance Minister Euclid Tsakalotos (himself an academic, like his colleague in charge of education) vetoed this arrangement partly because other groups of academics (medical doctors) with private practices had already paid the levy (Lakassas 2018).

  42. 42.

    This is the ‘Comparative Information Series’.

  43. 43.

    USB: Unified semi-autonomous body; USBB: Unified semi-autonomous body with formal board or advisory group comprised of external officials; SDMOF: Single directorate in Ministry of Finance ; MDMOF: Multiple directorates in MOF. The OECD has compiled this table on the basis of (a) responses to its survey and (b) research conducted by its own Secretariat (e.g. revenue body reports).

  44. 44.

    This usually takes the form of legislative amendments, i.e. usually short legal provisions that are added to longer legislative texts with which they bear little or no relation (hence the frequently use of the term ‘and other provisions’ in the formal title of bills). As a result, the objective is not necessarily evident, nor do potential opponents have the ability to get to know about it and for opposition to be mobilised. Moreover, legal drafting often deliberately makes matters even more opaque. To achieve that objective it takes the form of a long list of references to already existing legal texts that the new provision modifies (e.g. by limiting or extending their scope) that only insiders will understand and goes something like this: this provision modifies section x of paragraph 2 of art. 35 of law 9999/2002 as it has been updated by paragraph 3 of art. 456 of law 0000/2006 (entitled ‘ABCD and other provisions’) by removing from its scope those who meet the following criteria (criteria follow). The minister is hereby granted the right to extend the period during which this provision applies. The opacity of provisions like this is further exacerbated by the non-codification of laws (i.e. their non-amalgamation into a single, clear text that could serve as a reference point for all interested parties).

References

  • Afonso, Alexandre, Sotirios Zartaloudis, and Yannis Papadopoulos. 2015. “How party linkages shape austerity politics: clientelism and fiscal adjustment in Greece and Portugal during the eurozone crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (3):315-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alivizatos, Nikos K. 2010. “Unconstitutionalities: no to irresponsible outbidding.” Kathimerini, 11 July (in Greek). Accessed 2 June 2018. http://www.kathimerini.gr/720901/opinion/epikairothta/arxeio-monimes-sthles/antisyntagmatikothtes-oxi-sthn-aney8ynh-pleiodosia.

  • Allison, Graham T., and Kalypso Nicolaïdis, eds. 1997. The Greek Paradox: Promise vs. Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasatou, Marianthi. n.d. “Greeks don’t pay taxes”. In Greek Myths and Reality, edited by ELIAMEP, 19-24. Athens: ELIAMEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Donald L. 2004. “The Textualizing Functions of Writing for Organizational Change.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 18 (2):141-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artavanis, Nikolaos, Adair Morse, and Margarita Tsoutsoura. 2016. “Measuring Income Tax Evasion Using Bank Credit: Evidence from Greece.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2):739-798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballas, Apostolos, and Haridimos Tsoukas. 2004. “Measuring Nothing: The Case of the Greek National Health System.” Human Relations 57 (6):661- 690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Greece. 2010. Interim report on monetary policy, October. Athens: Bank of Greece (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo, Nancy. 2002. “Ministerial Elites in Southern Europe: Continuities, Changes and Comparisons.” South European Society and Politics 7 (2):205-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2011. Policy Performance and Governance Capacities in the OECD: Sustainable Governance Indicators 2011. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Social and Economic Research. 2015. Study to quantify and analyse the VAT Gap in the EU Member States - 2015 Report commissioned by the European Commission (DG TAXUD) TAXUD/2013/DE/321, FWC No. TAXUD/2010/CC/104. Warsaw/The Hague: CASE & CPB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, Nikos. 2012. “Market reforms in Greece, 1990-2008: external constraints and domestic limitations.” In From Stagnation to Forced Adjustment: Reforms in Greece, 1974-2010, edited by Stathis Kalyvas, George Pagoulatos and Haridimos Tsoukas, 91-116. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, William. 2010. Revenue Administration: Autonomy in Tax Administration and the Revenue Authority Model. edited by Fiscal Affairs Department. Washington, D.C.: IMF.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlström, Carl, Victor Lapuente, and Jan Teorell. 2012. “The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3):656-668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devas, Nick, Simon Delay, and Michael Hubbard. 2001. “Revenue authorities: are they the right vehicle for improved tax administration?” Public Administration and Development 21 (3):211-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamandouros, Nikiforos. 1994. Cultural dualism and political change in postauthoritarian Greece, Estudio/Working Paper 1994/50. Madrid: Juan March Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young. 2017. Tax evasion in Greece: causes, extent and proposals on how to combat it. Athens: DiaNEOsis (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervasti, Heikki, Antti Kouvo, and Takis Venetoklis. 2018. “Social and Institutional Trust in Times of Crisis: Greece, 2002–2011.” Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1862-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2007. Fiscal Blueprints: A path to a robust, modern and efficient tax administration. edited by Taxation and customs union. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2010. Report on Greek government deficit and debt statistics, COM(2010) 1 final. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, Gerda, Oliver Treib, Miriam Hartlapp, and Simone Leiber. 2005. Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, Themes in European Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Kevin. 2005. “Introduction: ‘Modernisation’ and the Structural Constraints of Greek Politics.” West European Politics 28 (2):223-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Kevin. 2008. ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ and the Greek case: explaining the constraints on domestic reform? London: Hellenic Observatory, LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Kevin. 2011. “The JCMS Annual Lecture: The Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis and EMU: A Failing State in a Skewed Regime.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (2):193-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Kevin. 2015. “External conditionality and the debt crisis: the ‘Troika’ and public administration reform in Greece.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (3):295-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Kevin, and Dimitris Papadimitriou. 2008. The Limits of Europeanization: Reform Capacity and Policy Conflict in Greece, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Kevin, and Dimitris Papadimitriou. 2012. “Assessing reform capacity in Greece: applying political economy perspectives.” In From Stagnation to Forced Adjustment: Reforms in Greece, 1974-2010, edited by Stathis Kalyvas, George Pagoulatos and Haridimos Tsoukas, 31-46. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Mitchell. 2017. Speech Acts. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjinikolaou, Prokopis. 2011. “Refoundation of the tax collection mechanism.” Kathimerini, 30 July (in Greek). http://www.kathimerini.gr/433309/article/oikonomia/ellhnikh-oikonomia/anasystash-foroeispraktikoy-mhxanismoy.

  • Handelsblatt. 2015. “Woran Griechenlands Steuerfahnder verzweifeln.” 20 July. Accessed 14 May 2018. http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/kampf-gegen-steuerhinterziehung-woran-griechenlands-steuerfahnder-verzweifeln-/12072776.html.

  • Hardouvelis, Ghikas, Theodosis Sampaniotis, and Manolis Davradakis. 2006. “State budget and deviation in its implementation.” Eurobank Research - Economy and Markets, 18 December (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, Christos A. 2000. “Social Pacts in Hellenic Industrial Relations: Odysseys or Sisyphus.” In Social Pacts in Europe: new dynamics, edited by G. Fajertag and P. Pochet, 219-236. Brussels: ETUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iordanoglou, Chrissafis I. 2011. “Memorandum - a post mortem.” Athens Review of Books, December (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, Anna, Wolfgang Mayer, Alex Mourmouras, and George Anayiotos. 2001. What Determines the Success or Failure of Fund-Supported Programs? Washington, D.C.: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Nikoleta, Chrisovaladis Malesios, Theodoros Iosifides, and Costas M. Sophoulis. 2008. “Social Capital in Greece: Measurement and Comparative Perspectives.” South European Society and Politics 13 (2):175-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2015. Modern Greece: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, Stathis, George Pagoulatos, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2012. From Stagnation to Forced Adjustment: Reforms in Greece, 1974-2010. London: C. Hurst & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathimerini. 2012. “New head for SDOE.” 10 August (in Greek). http://www.kathimerini.gr/10336/article/oikonomia/ellhnikh-oikonomia/neos-eidikos-grammateas-sto-sdoe

  • Khwaja, Munawer Sultan, and Indira Iyer. 2014. Revenue Potential, Tax Space, and Tax Gap A Comparative Analysis, Policy Research Working Papers. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, Maureen. 2010. Revenue Administration: Functionally Organized Tax Administration. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, Maureen, and William Crandall. 2006. Revenue Authorities: Issues and Problems in Evaluating Their Success. edited by Fiscal Affairs Department. Washington, D.C.: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondylis, Panayiotis. 2011. The causes of modern Greece’s decline. The cachexia of the middle classes in modern Greek society and ideology. 2nd ed. Athens: Themelio (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký, Petr, Jan-Hinrik Meyer Sahling, Francisco Panizza, Gerardo Scherlis, Christian Schuster, and Maria Spirova. 2016. “Party patronage in contemporary democracies: results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2):416-431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornelakis, Andreas, and Horen Voskeritsian. 2014. “The Transformation of Employment Regulation in Greece: Towards a Dysfunctional Liberal Market Economy?” Relations industrielles 69 (2):344-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kountouri, Fani. 2018. “Patterns of renewal and continuity in parliamentary elites. The Greek MPs from 1996 to 2015.” Journal of Legislative Studies 24 (4):568-586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutentakis, Fragkiskos. 2018. Financial stability is a basic condition for economic recovery. Interview with the Athens News Agency, 13 May. Athens: Athens News Agency (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Anne O. 1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society.” The American Economic Review 64 (3):291-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladi, Stella. 2005. “The Role of Experts in the Reform Process in Greece.” West European Politics 28 (2):279-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakassas, Apostolos. 2018. “Unrest in dentistry schools due to...Tsakalotos.” Kathimerini, 15 February (in Greek). http://www.kathimerini.gr/948847/article/epikairothta/ellada/anataraxh-stis-odontiatrikes-logw-tsakalwtoy.

  • Lavdas, Kostas A. 1997. The Europeanization of Greece: Interest Politics and the Crises of Integration. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Michael. 2011. Boomerang: the biggest bust. London: Penguin. Original edition, Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyberaki, Antigone, and Euclid Tsakalotos. 2002. “Reforming the Economy without Society: social and institutional constraints to reform in post-1974 Greece.” New Political Economy 7 (1):93-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Arthur J. 2004. Are semi-autonomous revenue authorities the answer to tax administration problems in developing countries? A practical guide. Research paper for the project: Fiscal Reform in Support of Trade Liberalization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2004. “Civil service reform in post-communist Europe: the bumpy road to depoliticisation.” West European Politics 27 (1):71-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, and Kim Sass Mikkelsen. 2016. “Civil service laws, merit, politicization, and corruption: the perspective of public officials from five East European countries.” Public Administration 94 (4):1105-1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina, Oscar, and Martin Rhodes. 2006. “Varieties of Capitalism and Mixed Market Economies.” APSA-EPS Newsletter of the European Politics & Society Section of the American Political Science Association, 1 (fall-winter):11-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, Vassilis, and Andreas Antoniades. 2009. Reform that! Greece’s failing reform technology: beyond ‘vested interests’ and ‘political exchange’, Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe, GreeSE Paper No 28. London: LSE/Hellenic Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossialos, Elias, and Sara Allin. 2005. “Interest Groups and Health System Reform in Greece.” West European Politics 28 (2):420-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, Nicos. 1978. Modern Greece: Facets of Underdevelopment. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nanopoulos, Antonis. 2010. The organisational structure of tax administration - the Hellenic reality. Athens: A. A. Livanis (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2007. Tax Administration in OECD and Selected Non-OECD Countries: Comparative Information Series (2006). In Comparative Information Series. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2009. Tax Administration in OECD and Selected Non-OECD Countries. Comparative Information Series (2008). In Comparative Information Series. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2011. Economic Surveys: Greece 2011. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2015. Tax Administration 2015: Comparative Information on OECD and other Advanced Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagoulatos, George. 2001. “The Enemy Within: Intragovernmental Politics and Organizational Failure in Greek Privatization.” Public Administration 79 (1):125-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagoulatos, George. 2003. Greece’s New Political Economy: State, Finance and Growth from Postwar to EMU. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Papaconstantinou, George. 2016. Game Over: The Truth about the Crisis. Athens: Papadopoulos (in Greek). Original edition, Game Over: Η Αλήθεια για την Κρίση.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, Takis S., and Zina Assimakopoulou. 2012. “Party patronage in Greece: political entrepreneurship in a party patronage democracy.” In Party patronage and party government in European democracies, edited by Petr Kopecký, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova, 145-162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Victoria, Graham Holland, Allan Jensen, and Janet Dowling. 2005. Greece: A Plan for Improving Tax Compliance. edited by Fiscal Affairs Department. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. Guy, and Jon Pierre. 2004. “Politicization of the civil service. Concepts, causes, consequences.” In Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective, edited by B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre, 1-13. London/N.Y.: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • POE-DOY. 2012. Press release, 20 March: They must, at last take responsibility for the public revenue administration’s condition. Athens: POE-DOY (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Linda L., and François Cooren. 2004. “Alternative Perspectives on the Role of Text and Agency in Constituting Organizations.” Organization 11 (3):323-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Edited by Robert Leonardi and Raffaella Nanetti. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapanos, Vassilis Th. 2007. The drafting and implementation of the state budget: European experience and Greek reality. Athens: IOBE/Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapanos, Vassilis Th., and Georgia Kaplanoglou. 2014. “Governance, growth and the recent economic crisis. The case of Greece and Cyprus.” Cyprus Economic Policy Review 8 (1):3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Bo. 2013. “Corruption and Social Trust: Why the Fish Rots from the Head Down.” Social Research 80 (4):1009-1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2004. “Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4):661-679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skouras, Spyros, and Nicos Christodoulakis. 2014. “Electoral misgovernance cycles: evidence from wildfires and tax evasion in Greece.” Public Choice 159 (3):533-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry. 1990. “Towards a History of Speech Act Theory.” In Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions. Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle, edited by A. Burkhardt, 29-61. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulos, Dimitri A. 2012. “The paradox of non-reform in a reform-ripe environment: lessons from post-authoritarian Greece.” In From Stagnation to Forced Adjustment: Reforms in Greece, 1974-2010, edited by Stathis Kalyvas, George Pagoulatos and Haridimos Tsoukas, 9-30. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulos, Dimitri A., and Dimitris Bourikos. 2002. “Ministerial Elites in Greece, 1843-2001: A Synthesis of Old Sources and New Data.” South European Society and Politics 7 (2):153-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulos, Dimitris A. 2001. The Top Levels of the Clientelist State. Organization, Staffing and Politicization of the Higher Grades of the Central Administration in Greece. Athens: Potamos (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulos, Dimitris A., and Leonidas Christopoulos. 2016. Polynomy, bad law-making, and red tape in Greece: διαΝΕΟσις (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanou, Calliope. 1996. “Penelope’s Suitors: Administrative Modernisation and Party Competition in Greece.” West European Politics 19 (1):97-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanou, Calliope. 2008. “State reform in Greece: responding to old and new challenges.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 21 (2):150-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanou, Calliope. 2012. “The quandary of administrative reform: institutional and performance modernization.” In From Stagnation to Forced Adjustment: Reforms in Greece, 1974-2010, edited by Stathis Kalyvas, George Pagoulatos and Haridimos Tsoukas, 171-193. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanou, Calliope, and Dimitri A. Sotiropoulos. 2011. “The Odyssey of administrative reforms in Greece, 1981-2009: a tale of two reform paths.” Public Administration 89 (3):723-737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spourdalakis, Michalis, ed. 1998. PASOK: Party - State - Society. Athens: Patakis (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrück, Peer. 2010. Unterm Strich. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, T., T. Byrd, W. Crandall, J. Leamy, J. Nagy, I. Petrova, B. Russell, E. Empl, F. Van Driessche, P. Weinzierl, S. Weinzierl, and C. Wendling. 2013. Greece - fourth joint assessment by the IMF and the European Commission: revenue management and institutional reforms. IMF/European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ta Nea. 2012a. “All heads of tax office, SDOE and customs heads to be replaced.” 19 October (in Greek). Accessed 17 May 2018. http://www.tanea.gr/news/economy/article/4761548/?iid=2.

  • Ta Nea. 2012b. “Who is Stelios Stasinopoulos.” 3 October (in Greek). Accessed 14 May 2018. http://www.tanea.gr/news/greece/article/4756657/?iid=2.

  • Taliercio, Robert. 2004. Designing Performance: The Semi-Autonomous Revenue Authority Model in Africa and Latin America. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Telloglou, Tassos. 2012. “The ‘unknown war’ inside SDOE.” Kathimerini, 14 October (in Greek). Accessed 14 May 2018. http://www.kathimerini.gr/470818/article/epikairothta/ellada/o-agnwstos-polemos-sto-eswteriko-toy-sdoe.

  • Theocharis, Yannis, and Jan W. van Deth. 2015. “A modern tragedy? Institutional causes and democratic consequences of the Greek crisis.” Representation 51 (1):63-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomadakis, Stavros B. 1997. “The Greek economy: performance, expectations and paradoxes.” In The Greek paradox: promise vs. performance, edited by Graham T. Allison and Kalypso Nicolaidis, 39-60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinios, Platon. 2012. “The pensions merry-go-round: the end of a cycle?” In From Stagnation to Forced Adjustment: Reforms in Greece, 1974-2010, edited by Stathis Kalyvas, George Pagoulatos and Haridimos Tsoukas, 117-131. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakalotos, Euclid. 2010. Contesting Greek exceptionalism: The political economy of the current crisis. edited by Unpublished mimeo. Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukalas, Constantine. 1969. The Greek Tragedy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukalas, Constantine. 1993. “Free-riders in wonderland: on Greeks in Greece.” Hellenic Political Science Review (1):9-52 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukalis, Loukas. 1997. “Beyond the Greek Paradox. In The Greek Paradox: Promise vs. Performance.” In The Greek Paradox: Promise vs. Performance, edited by Graham T. Allison and Kalypso Nicolaidis. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, Charidimos K. 2012. “Close friends are always preferable.” Kathimerini, 2 September (in Greek). Accessed 22 March 2017. http://www.kathimerini.gr/731682/opinion/epikairothta/arxeio-monimes-sthles/oi-kollhtoi-einai-panta-protimoteroi.

  • Wildavsky, Aaron. 1975. Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. 2016. “Doing Business - Measuring Business Regulations: Ease of Doing Business in Greece.” World Bank, accessed 30 August. http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/greece - close.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambarloukou, Stella. 2006. “Collective Bargaining and Social Pacts: Greece in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 12 (2):211-229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dimitrakopoulos, D., Passas, A. (2020). Introduction. In: The Depoliticisation of Greece’s Public Revenue Administration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23213-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics