Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing and Enacting a Research Program in the Context of Your Own Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designing, Conducting, and Publishing Quality Research in Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

  • 1092 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I reflect on how I have designed and enacted a research program in the context of teaching mathematics content and methods courses for university prospective elementary teachers. In my work, my research and teaching inform each other. I discuss the cyclical nature of such a research program where each research project lays the foundation for the following ones. I also discuss how to build collaborative research programs with other researchers interested in similar research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, D. (1988). The subject matter preparation of prospective mathematics teachers: Challenging the myths (Report No. NCRTE-RR-88-3). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 301 468).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., & Hiebert, J. (2017). Making classroom implementation an integral part of research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48, 342–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Z., Thanheiser, E., Welder, R., Tobias, J., Hillen, A., & Olanoff, D. (2016). When is a mathematical task a good task? In L. Hart, S. Oesterle, S. Swars, & A. Kajander (Eds.), The mathematics education of elementary teachers: Issues and strategies for content courses (pp. 9–24). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Z., Tobias, J., Olanoff, D., Thanheiser, E., Hillen, A. F., & Welder, R. M. (2014). Prospective elementary teachers’ analysis of student thinking. In I. P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 6, p. 67). Vancouver, Canada: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Hiebert, J. C., Murray, H. G., Human, P. G., Olivier, A. I., … Fennema, E. (1997). Children’s conceptual structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 130–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, E., & Simpson, A. J. (2018). Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of multidigit number: Exemplifying a replication framework for mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0242-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C. (1986). Place value: An explanation of its difficulty and educational implications for the primary grades. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 1(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C. (1994). Young children continue to reinvent arithmetic-3rd grade-implications of Piaget’s theory. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C., Lewis, B. A., & Livingston, S. J. (1993). Primary arithmetic: Children inventing their own procedures. Arithmetic Teacher, 41, 200–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Making Waves. (2015). Why do we tell stories? Retrieved from http://www.makingwaves.org/current-work/life-story/introduction/why-do-we-tell-stories/

  • National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olanoff, D., Feldman, Z., Welder, R., Tobias, J., Thanheiser, E., & Hillen, A. (2016). Greater number of larger pieces: A strategy to promote prospective teachers’ fraction number sense development. In M. B. Wood, M. E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 799–807). Tucson: The University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olanoff, D., Hillen, A. F., Tobias, J., Welder, R. M., Thanheiser, E., & Feldman, Z. (2014). Facilitating prospective teachers’ fraction number sense development through problem solving and problem posing. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 6, p. 187). Vancouver, Canada: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, F. (2011). The art of immersion: Why do we tell stories? Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2011/03/why-do-we-tell-stories/

  • Strand, K., & Thanheiser, E. (2017). NCTM articles as reading assignments to motivate prospective elementary teachers in mathematics courses. In A. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 1455–1461). San Diego, CA: SIGMAA-RUME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X. H., Chambris, C., Sayers, J., Siu, M. K., Cooper, J., Dorier, J.-L., … Ejersbo, L. R. (2018). The what and why of whole number arithmetic: Foundational ideas from history, language and societal changes. In M. G. Bartolini Bussi & X. H. Sun (Eds.), Building the foundation: Whole numbers in the primary grades: The 23rd ICMI study (pp. 91–124). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2005). Preservice teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego and San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2009). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 251–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2010). Investigating further preservice teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers: Refining a framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9252-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2014). Developing prospective teachers’ conceptions with well-designed tasks: Explaining successes and analyzing conceptual difficulties. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9272-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2018a). Brief report: The effects of preservice elementary teachers’ accurate self-assessments in the context whole number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2018b). Commentary on mathematical tasks and the student: Coherence and connectedness of mathematics, cycles of task design, and context of implementation. ZDM, 49, 965–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0895-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., & Browning, C. (2014). The mathematical content knowledge of elementary prospective teachers [Special issue]. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., Browning, C., Jacobbe, T., Kastberg, S., Lo, J., Moss, M., … Watanabe, T. (2009). Preservice elementary school teachers’ content knowledge in mathematics—Working group. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1599–1606). Atlanta: Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., Browning, C., Kastberg, S., Lioutikova, E., Lo, J., Moss, M., … Roy, G. J. (2010). Preservice elementary school teachers’ content knowledge in mathematics—Working group. In P. Brosnan, D. B. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1614–1622). Columbus: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., Hillen, A., Olanoff, D., Feldman, Z., Welder, R., & Tobias, J. (2013). Task design in mathematics content courses for preservice elementary teachers: A collaborative approach. In M. Martinez & A. Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the north american chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 893–896). Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., & Jansen, A. (2016). Inviting prospective teachers to publicly share their rough draft mathematical thinking. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 4, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., & Melhuish, K. (2019). Leveraging variation of historical number systems to build an understanding of the base-ten place-value system. Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematick, 51(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0984-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., Olanoff, D., Hillen, A., Feldman, Z., Tobias, J. M., & Welder, R. M. (2016). Reflective analysis as a tool for task redesign: The case of prospective elementary teachers solving and posing fraction comparison problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9334-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., & Philipp, R. (2017, August). Do prospective elementary teachers (in the United States) notice cultural aspects of mathematics in a teaching scenario? Paper presented at the Symposium for Elementary Mathematics Teaching (SEMT), Prague, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., Philipp, R., & Fasteen, J. (2012). Using interviews to motivate teachers to learn mathematics and reflect on their learning. In L. R. Van Zoest, J.-J. Lo, & J. L. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 769–772). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E., Strand, K., & Mills, B. (2011, February). Using interactions with children and/or artifacts of children’s mathematical reasoning to promote the development of preservice teachers’ subject matter knowledge. Paper presented at the 14th annual conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, J., Olanoff, D., Hillen, A. F., Welder, R. M., Feldman, Z., & Thanheiser, E. (2014). Research-based modifications of elementary school tasks for use in teacher preparation. In K. Karp & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education 2014: Using research to improve instruction (pp. 181–192). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welder, R., Tobias, J., Feldman, Z., Hillen, A., Olanoff, D., & Thanheiser, E. (2015). Modifying children’s tasks into cognitively demanding tasks for preservice elementary teachers. In T. G. Bartell, K. N. Bieda, R. T. Putnam, K. Bradfield, & H. Dominguez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 984–987). East Lansing: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

    Eva Thanheiser

Authors
  1. Eva Thanheiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Thanheiser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA

    Keith R. Leatham

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thanheiser, E. (2019). Developing and Enacting a Research Program in the Context of Your Own Classroom. In: Leatham, K.R. (eds) Designing, Conducting, and Publishing Quality Research in Mathematics Education. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23505-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23505-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23504-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23505-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation