Skip to main content

Conditionally Coordinating Contracts in Supply Chains

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Dynamic Games

Abstract

The chapter revisits the supplier-retailer supply chain game and investigates target sales rebate and buyback contracts, which motivate participants for both individual rational and Pareto optimal behavior. The research considers the Stackelberg model in supply chain under condition of fixed retail price and stochastic demand. Authors proposed the algorithm of the conditionally coordinating problem solving for both types of contracts. A general framework is introduced, the condition for achieving the coordinating equilibrium is characterized, and a special case for uniformly distributed demand is analyzed. The models with uniformly distributed demand demonstrate that the conditional coordination can be achieved, and examples show that the problem of establishing contract parameters is a problem of sharing of supply chain expected profit under a compromise between supplier and retailer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Becker-Peth, M., Katok, E., Thonemann, U.W.: Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Manag. Sci. 59(8), 1800–1816 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein, F., Federgruen, A.: Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 51(1), 18–29 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cachon, G.P., Netessine, S.: Game theory in supply chain analysis. In: Simchi-Levi, D., Wu, S.D., Shen, Z.M. (eds.) Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cachon, G.P.: Supply chain coordination with contracts. In: Kok, A.G., Graves, S.C. (eds.) Handbooks in Operation Research and Management Science. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cachon, G.P., Lariviere, M.: Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Manag. Sci. 51(1), 30–44 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu, C.H., Choi, T.M., Li, X.: Supply chain coordination with risk sensitive retailer under target sales rebate. Automatica 47(8), 1617–1625 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiu, C.H., Choi, T.M., Tang, C.S.: Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price-dependent demands. Prod. Oper. Manag. 20(1), 81–91 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiu, C.H., Choi, T.M., Yeung, H.T., Zhao, Y.: Sales rebates in fashion supply chains. Math. Probl. Eng. 2012, 1–19 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Donohue, K.L.: Efficient supply contracts for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production modes. Manag. Sci. 46(11), 1397–1411 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Emmons, H., Gilbert, S.M.: Note. The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods. Manag. Sci. 44(2), 276–283 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Genc, T.S., Giovanni, P.: Optimal return and rebate mechanism in a closed-loop supply chain game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269, 661–681 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Heydari, J., Asl-Najafi, J.: A revised sales rebate contract with effort-dependent demand: a channel coordination approach. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12556

  13. Hou, J., Zeng, A.Z., Zhao, L.: Coordination with a backup supplier through buyback contract under supply disruption. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 46(6), 881–895 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, X., Gu, J.W., Ching, W.K., Siu, T.K.: Impact of secondary market on consumer return policies and supply chain coordination. Omega 45, 57–70 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnan, H., Kapuscinski, R., Butz, D.A.: Coordinating contracts for decentralized supply chains with retailer promotional effort. Manag. Sci. 50(1), 48–63 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, L., Whang, S.: Game theory models in operations management and information systems. In: Chatterjee K., Samuelson, W.F. (eds) Game Theory and Business Applications. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liao, C.-N.: A joint demand uncertainty, sales effort, and rebate form in marketing channel. J. Stat. Manag. Syst. 12(1), 155–172 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Muzaffar, A., Deng, S., Malik, M.N.: Contracting mechanism with imperfect information in a two-level supply chain. Oper. Res. Int. J. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0327-4

  19. Pasternack, B.A.: Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Mark. Sci. 4(2), 166–176 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrosyan, L.A., Zenkevich, N.A., Shevkoplyas E.V.: Game Theory. SPb., BKHV-Petersburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saha, S.: Supply chain coordination through rebate induced contracts. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 50, 120–137 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sainathan, A., Groenevelt, M.: Vendor managed inventory contracts - coordinating the supply chain while looking from the vendor’s perspective. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272(1), 249–260 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor, T.: Coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effect. Manag. Sci. 48(8), 992–1007 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsay, A.A.: Managing retail channel overstock: markdown money and return policies. J. Retail. 77(4), 457–492 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, C.X.: A general framework of supply chain contract models. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 7(5), 302–310 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong, W.K., Qi, J., Leung, S.Y.S.: Coordinating supply chains with sales rebate contracts and vendor managed inventory. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 120(1), 151–161 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiao, T., Shi, K., Yang, D.: Coordination of a supply chain with consumer return under demand uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124(1), 171–180 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiong, H., Chen, B., Xie, J.: A composite contract based on buyback and quantity flexibility contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 210(3), 559–567 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, Y., Cao, E., Lu, K.L., Zhang, G.: Optimal contract design for dual-channel supply chains under information asymmetry. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 32(8), 1087–1097 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolay A. Zenkevich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zenkevich, N.A., Berezinets, I., Nikolchenko, N., Rucheva, A. (2019). Conditionally Coordinating Contracts in Supply Chains. In: Petrosyan, L., Mazalov, V., Zenkevich, N. (eds) Frontiers of Dynamic Games. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23699-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics