Abstract
This chapter seeks to understand culture from the perspective of Chinese scholars of culture as complementary to Western dominant culture theories and theorising. Notions and concepts of culture developed in and by Chinese local cultural theorists may be advantageous analytical tools when addressing Chinese cultural phenomena. This chapter thus presents the theories and theorising of Chinese culture developed by oriental scholars. Specifically, it introduces the key frameworks for understanding Chinese culture (Liang, The substance of Chinese culture. Shanghai Renmin Publisher, Shanghai, 2005; Li, Studies on Cultural Soft Power 1, 11–18, 2016; Qian, Substance of cultural studies. Jiuzhou Publisher, Beijing, 2011), key concepts of the core Chinese culture, and examines these concepts in relation to some fundamental Western categorisations of knowledge. Based on the theoretical review of Chinese scholars’ work, the argument being made is that Chinese theorisation acknowledges culture development that has followed universal laws and the objective principles of the world, and as such the elements of culture itself are not as random, subjective or solely based in individuality as some have assumed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this context ‘spiritually’ has no relevance to religion. For an atheist country like China, ‘spirituality’ relates to morality, ethics and virtues.
- 2.
“Abduction is a reasoning process invoked to explain a puzzling observation”. It is “thinking from evidence to explanation, a type of reasoning characteristic of many different situations with incomplete information” (Aliseda 2006, p. 28).
References
Adamson, T. (2005). Measure for measure: The reliance of the human knowledge on the things of the world. Ethics and the Environment, 10(2), 175–217. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/189983
Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive reasoning. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chan, B., Choy, G., & Lee, A. (2009). Harmony as the basis for education for sustainable development: A case example of Yew Chung International Schools. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168877.
Chongde, L., & Tsingan, L. (2003). Multiple intelligence and the structure of thinking. Theory & Psychology, 13(6), 829–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354303136004.
Ding, H. (2016). From Carving Jade to Exhausting li –Aesthetics of the hanzi li. (A thesis submitted to fulfil a Doctoral Degree at Nanjing Normal University).
Duan, Y. (1815). Shuowen Jiezi Zhu. Qing.
Fan, H. (2006). The metaphysical foundation of morality. Beijing: Social Science Publisher of China.
Fan, H. (2018). Cultural self-awareness and the cultural confidence in Chinese ethics. Journal of Southeast University, 20(01), 6–14.
Fung, Y. L. (1997). A short history of Chinese philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ginzberg, E. (2016). Seeking order in chaos: A definition of culture. Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 5(2), 19–31. Retrieved from http://dl6.globalstf.org/index.php/jlss/article/view/638/584
Gu, M. (2012). Sinologism: An alternative to orientalism and postcolonialism. London/New York: Routledge.
Hacker, P. (2009). Philosophy: A contribution, not to human knowledge, but to human understanding. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 65, 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246109990087.
Han, J. (2017). Post-lingual pedagogy: Hanzi method. London: Palgrave.
Harbour, F. (1995). Basic moral values: A shared core. Ethics and International Affairs, 9, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1995.tb00176.x.
Ji, L.-J., Lee, A., & Guo, T. (2010). The thinking styles of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 155–167). New York: Oxford University Press.
Jullien, F. (2014). On the universal: The uniform, the common and dialogue between cultures. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kekeya, J. (2018). Culture and language are one, and the same and facilitate human learning and development. Contemporary PNG Studies: DWU Research Journal, 28, 75–83. Retrieved from https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=221887126559232;res=IELIND
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x.
Lau, K. Y. (2016). To what extent can phenomenology do justice to Chinese philosophy? Phenomenology and Intercultural Understanding, 87, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44764-3_3.
Li, D. (2016). What is culture? Studies on Cultural Soft Power, 1(4), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.19468/j.cnki.2096-1987.2016.04.002.
Li, F. (2017). On Japan’s national quality education. Era Education, 19, 140. 李芬 (2017). 论日本的国民素质教育, 时代教育, 19 期, (140页).
Li, M. (2008). China debates soft power. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 22(2), 287–308.
Liang, S. (2005). The substance of Chinese culture. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Publisher. 梁漱溟(2005), 中国文化要义, 上海人民出版社。.
Liu, Y. (2016). The wisdom of Chinese traditional morality education. Journal of China Education. Retrieved from http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0902/c40531-28685225.html
McConachy, T. (2017). Developing intercultural perspectives on language use: Exploring pragmatics and culture in foreign language learning (Vol. 1). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1647309&site=ehost-live
Mizzoni, J. (2017). Ethics—The basics. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Qian, M. (2011). Substance of cultural studies. Beijing: Jiuzhou Publisher.
Qian, J. (2019). The relation between language and culture. In J. Vopava, V. Douda, R. Kratochvil, & M. Konecki (Eds.), Proceedings of MAC 2018 in Prague: Multidisciplinary Academic Conference. Prague: MAC Prague Consulting Ltd.
Robinson, C. J., & Altarriba, J. (2014). Culture and language processing. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 240–252). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwsau/reader.action?docID=1899816
Rošker, J. (2019). Chinese theories of perception and the structural approach to comprehension. In B. Glenny & J. Silva (Eds.), The senses and the history of philosophy. New York: Routledge, n.p.
Smolicz, J. (1980). Language as a core value of culture. Journal of Applied Linguistics, (Singapore), 11, 1–13. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/003368828001100101
Straub, D., Loch, K., Evaristo, R., Karahanna, E., & Srite, M. (2002). Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. Journal of Global Information Management, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2002010102.
Sun, Q., & Han, L. (2016). Zhongyong and social life. Journal of Hubei Correspondence University, 17, 106–107.
Tahko, T. (2011). A priori and a posteriori: A bootstrapping relationship. Metaphysica, 12, 151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12133-011-0083-5.
Wang, B. (2014). On the Doctrine of Mean in Chinese culture. Studies of Philosophy, 8, 41–42.
Xu, S. (2009). Shuowen Jiezi. Beijing: Jiuzhou Publisher.
Xu, K. (2018). Zhongdaology: A Confucian way of philosophical thinking and moral life. Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy, 9, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp2320189229.
Yue, D. (2016). China and the west at the crossroads. Singapore: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-1116-0.
Zeng, X. (2017). On higher education from the Six Arts perspective – The insight of Six Arts for contemporary higher education. Journal of College Entrance Examination, 2, 242–243.
Zhang, X., Gao, D., & Fu, H. (2011). Dialectical thinking reduces aggressive tendencies. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 1, 1–5.
Zhao, J. (2018). The discrimination between ethics identity and moral identity. Journal of Nanchang University, 49(06), 27–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Han, J. (2020). Culture Through Chinese Theorising: Human Transforming and Transforming Human. In: Theorising Culture. Palgrave Studies in Teaching and Learning Chinese. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23880-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23880-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23879-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23880-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)