Abstract
The popularity of prison-based dog training programs as a new and innovative approach toward offender rehabilitation has led to the growth of these programs nationally and internationally. Despite the overwhelmingly positive perception of dog programs by prison administrators, the introduction of dogs into any correctional setting does raise some security concerns. Such concerns include perimeter security, control of inmate movement and potential for escape, control of contraband , and issues with staff perceptions of dog training programs . Additionally, when implementing a dog training program, correctional administrators must consider the potential for abuse, inmate conflict, and concerns regarding the dogs injuring inmates, staff, or visitors. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss some of the security issues that have arisen when dogs are introduced to a correctional facility. Furthermore, this chapter will discuss efforts made in successful programs to alleviate or minimize such security concerns. Thus far, the evidence has indicated that if implemented properly, not only are the security concerns of dog training programs quite manageable but these innovative programs can provide a number of positive results that could enhance the security of a correctional facility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Many facilities at SCDC implement a character dorm which is usually the best behaved unit in the yard. The inmates have to participate in a cognitive retraining program and sign a behavior contract to be allowed in the dorm. However, Allendale C.I. is a character institution, meaning all the inmates must behave or risk being sent to a higher custody level .
References
Achen, S. (2018, May 14). Personal telephone interview.
Bachi, K. (2013). Equine-facilitated prison-based programs within the context of prison-based animal programs: State of the science review. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52, 46–74.
Britton, D. M., & Button, A. (2005). Prison Pups: Assessing the effects of dog training programs in correctional facilities. Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), 79–95.
Brooks, H. L., Rogers, A., Kapadia, D., Pilgrim, J., Reevers, D., & Vassilev, I. (2012). Creature comforts: Personal communities, pets, and the work of managing a long term condition. Chronic Illness, 9, 87–102.
Butler, H. D., Johnson, W. W., & Griffin, O. H. (2014). The treatment of mentally ill supermax: An evaluation of state supermax policies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(11), 1338–1353.
Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Perceived effects of dog-training programmes in correctional Settings. Journal of Forensic Practice, 16(3), 171–183.
Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). The effectiveness of dog-training programs in prison. Prison Journal, 96(6), 854–876.
Cox, A. (2016). Watch, listen and learn: Contraband prevention plans. American Jails, (3), 8–12.
Currie, N. (2008). A case study of incarcerated males participating in a canine training program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
Cusack, C. M. (2015). Animals and criminal justice. New York: Routledge.
Davis, K. (2007). Perspectives of youth in an animal-centered correctional vocational program: A qualitive evaluation of Project Pooch (Unpublished research monograph). Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
Deaton, C. (2005). Humanizing prisons with animals: A closer look at “Cell Dogs” and horse programs in correctional institutions. Journal of Correctional Education, 56, 46–62.
Dietz, E. F., O’Connell, D. J., & Scarpitti, F. R. (2003). Therapeutic communities and prison management: An examination of the effects of operating an in-prison therapeutic community on levels of institutional disorder. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 210–223.
Farber, M. (2018, September 3). Ohio animal rescue center claims inmates with prison program killed dog: ‘We are absolutely heartbroken.’ Fox News. Retrieved November 27, 2018 from: https://www.foxnews.com/us/ohio-animal-rescue-center-claims-inmates-with-prison-program-killed-dog-we-are-absolutely-heartbroken.
Florida Department of Corrections. (2018). February 13). Service dog training and canine obedience training for canine adoptions, Procedure, 506, 102.
Fournier, A., Geller, E., & Fortney, E. (2007). Human-animal interaction in prison setting: Impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress and social skills. Behavior and Social Issues, 16, 89–105.
Furst, G. (2006). Prison-based animal programs: A national survey. The Prison Journal, 86(4), 407–430.
Furst, G. (2007). Without words to get in the way: Symbolic interaction in prison-based animal programs. Qualitative Sociology Review, 3(1), 96–109.
Furst, G. (2011). Animal programs in prison: A comprehensive assessment. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Grohs, M. (2017). Contraband frustration (pp. 12–18). July/August: Corrections Forum.
Grommon, E. (2017). Managed access technology to combat contraband cell phones in prison: Findings from a process evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 39–47.
Guerico, G. F. (2017). Layers of security optimize contraband detection (pp. 34–40). March/April: Corrections Forum.
Gussak, D. (2004). A pilot research study on the efficacy of art therapy with prison inmates. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 31(245–25), 9.
Harkrader, T., Burke, T. W., & Owen, S. S. (2004). Pound puppies: The rehabilitative uses of dogs in correctional facilities. Corrections Today, 66(2), 74–79.
Hill, L. (2016). Becoming the person your dog thinks you are: An assessment of Florida prison-based dog training programs on prison misconduct, post-release employment and recidivism. Florida State University. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from: http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_2016SP_Hill_fsu_0071E_13183.
Hogle, P. S. (2009). Going to the dogs: Prison-based training programs are win-win. Corrections Today, 71(4), 69–72.
Hunsicker, L. (2008). Security and treatment collaboration. Corrections today, 70(5), 26–27.
James, D., & Glaze, L. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.
Josi, D., & Sechrest, D. (1996). Treatment versus security. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 23(1–2), 167–184.
Katcher, A., Beck, A., & Levine, D. (1989). Evaluation of a pet program in prison—The Pal Project at Lorton. Anthrozoös, 2(3), 175.
Korten, D. (2007, May 31). Indiana State Prison, Michigan City, Indiana: A Better Place for Everyone, Cat Odyssey. Retrieved from: http://catodyssey.blogspot.com/2007/05/indiana-state-prison-michigan-city.html.
Lai, J. (1998). Literature review: Pet facilitated therapy in correctional institutions. Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Services of Canada. Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Women Correctional.
Langan, N. P., & Pelissier, B. M. (2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 291–301.
Mulcahy, C., & McLaughlin, D. (2013). Is the tail wagging the dog? A review of the evidence for prison animal programs. Australian Psychologist, 48(5), 370–378.
Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Women. (1998). Literature review: Pet facilitated therapy in correctional institutions. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada.
Ormerod, E. (2008). Companion animals and offender rehabilitation: Experiences from a prison therapeutic community in Scotland. Therapeutic Communities, 29, 285–296.
Putnam Correctional Facility. (2012, January 25). Prison Greyhound Program. Facility Directive ISF 108.
Richardson-Taylor, K., & Blanchette, K. (2001). Results of an evaluation of the Pawsitive Directions Canine Program at Nova Institution for Women. Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service of Canada.
Seiter, R. (2011). Corrections: An introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Pearson Education.
Seiter, R. (2012). Correctional administration: Integrating theory and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Pearson Education.
South Carolina Department of Corrections. (2016, June 17). Animal based programs. Policy PS-10.16.
Strimple, E. O. (2003). A history of prison inmate-animal interaction programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 70–78.
Turner, W. (2007). The experiences of offenders in a prison canine program. Federal Probation, 71(1), 38–43.
Washington Department of Corrections. (2016, January 1). Offender dog/cat programs. Policy DOC 700.350.
Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., & Bosch, D. (2007). More than a furry companion; The Ripple Effect of companion animals on neighborhood interactions and sense of community. Society and Animals, 15, 43–56.
Zoonotic Diseases. (2018, August 9). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from: https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/basics/zoonotic-diseases.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hill, L.B., Wright, B. (2019). Considering the Correctional Context: Security Issues in Prison-Based Dog Training Programs. In: Jalongo, M. (eds) Prison Dog Programs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25617-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25618-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)