Skip to main content

Implications of Metropolitan Policy Mobility: Tracing the Relevance of Travelling Ideas for Metropolitan Regions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance

Abstract

This chapter traces the implications of policy mobility for metropolitan regions. It addresses the context and conditions of policy movements while reflecting on the consequences of mobile policy ideas from the perspective of metropolitan regions. To understand the impacts of metropolitan policy mobility, this chapter first asks who profits from the increased travelling of ideas. This is important because the winners of transnational policy mobility form an elite of metropolitan regions with the capacity, resources and interest to act beyond their national and regional boundaries. Second, the chapter suggests an explorative perspective on where policy mobility is leading the political development of metropolitan regions. Accordingly, the chapter moves away from a focus on transferred ideas and transfer mechanisms towards the reception and adaptation of travelling policies in the local context. Finally, the chapter sheds light on the relevance of policy mobility for everyday routines and formal procedures in metropolitan regions. This includes not only examining the implications for policymaking on metropolitan issues at other scales, but also the possibilities of policy failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agence d’Urbanisme de Lyon. (2016). Les cahiers de la gouvernance métropolitaine: Présentation synthétique de 11 villes européennes [The metropolitan governance notebooks: A summary of 11 European cities]: Lyon, Leipzig, Hamburg, Munich, Barcelona, Turin, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Brusells, Stockholm, Manchester. http://documentation.urbalyon.org/dyn/portal/index.seam?page=alo&aloId=57065&fonds=&cid=2284. Accessed April 15, 2019..

  • Belmessous, F. (2008). La fabrique d’un territoire communautaire: Des lieux, des projéts, des représentations et des politiques [The making of a community territory: Places, projections, representations and policies]. http://www.popsu.archi.fr/sites/default/files/nodes/document/824/files/lyon-la-fabrique-du-territoire-courly.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2019.

  • Benz, A., & Frenzel, A. (2002). Institutional policies in a federal state: The creation of the Association of the Urban Region of Stuttgart. In B. Jouve, & C. Lefèvre (Eds.), Local power, territory, and institutions in european metropolitan regions (pp. 153–174). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, K., Richardson, T., Dabinett, G., & Jensen, O. (2004). Values in a vacuum? Towards an integrated multi-level analysis of the governance of European space. European Planning Studies, 12(8), 1175–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boino, P. (Ed.). (2009). Lyon: La production de la ville [Lyon: The production of the city]. Marseille: Parenthèses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2003). Standortpolitik, state rescaling and the new metropolitan governance in Western Europe. disP—The Planning Review, 152(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N. (2011). Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska, & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, K., Coenen, L., Acuto, M., & Gleeson, B. (2019). Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018816010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B., & Mossberger, K. (2006). Building blocks for a methodology for comparative urban political research. Urban Affairs Review, 41(4), 550–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández de Losada Passols, A., & Calvete Moreno, A. (2016). Management of EU Structural Funds by European Metropolitan Areas and Cities—Barcelona Study Barcelona: Barcelona Metropolitan Area, AMB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichter, H. (2002). Regionale handlungsfähigkeit im Europäischen wettbewerb: Spezifische ausprägungen regionaler governance-formen am beispiel dreier Deutscher metropolregionen [Regional capacity to act in European competition: Specific characteristics of regional forms of governance exemplified by three German metropolitan regions]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 6(7), 313–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(3), 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, C. (2017). Metropolitan regions as a changing policy concept in a comparative perspective. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, C. (2020). European dimension of metropolitan policies: Policy learning and reframing of metropolitan regions. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galimberti, D. (2015). Gouverner le développement économique des territoires: entre politique et société. Une comparaison des régions de Lyon et Milan [To govern the economic development of territories: between politics and society. A comparison of the regions of Lyon and Milan] (1970-2011). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Milan-Bicocca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galland, D., & Harrison, J. (2020). Conceptualising metropolitan regions: How institutions, policies, spatial imaginaries and planning are influencing metropolitan development. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 1–21). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A. (2007). Taking city regions seriously? Response to debate on city-regions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1998). The place of ‘Europe’ in contemporary spatial strategy making. European Urban and Regional Studies, 5(2), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2011). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11(2), 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiden, N. (2010). Urban foreign policy and domestic dilemmas: Insights from Swiss and EU City-Regions. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2001). Differential Europe: The European Union impact on national policymaking. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Initiativkreis Europäische Metropolregionen in Deutschland [IMK]. (2013). Governance-Modelle der Europäischen Metropolregionen in Deutschland im Ãœberblick [An overview of the governance models of European metropolitan regions in Germany]. http://www.deutsche-metropolregionen.org/fileadmin/ikm/IKM-Veroeffentlichungen/Governance-Modelle_Deutsche_Metropolregionen_April_2013.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2019.

  • Jong, M. (2013). China’s art of institutional bricolage: Selectiveness and gradualism in the policy transfer style of a nation. Policy and Society, 32(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouve, B. (2005). From government to urban governance in Western Europe: A critical analysis. Public Administration and Development, 25(4), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler, D., & Piliutyte, J. (2007). Intergovernmental relations and international urban strategies. Constraints and opportunities in multilevel polities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(3), 357–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landtag Baden-Württemberg. (1994). Gesetz über die Errichtung des Verbands Region Stuttgart. Verkündet als Artikel 1 des Gesetzes über die Stärkung der Zusammenarbeit in der Region Stuttgart vom 7. Februar 1994 [Law on the establishment of the Verband Region Stuttgart. Proclaimed as Article 1 of the Law on Strengthening Cooperation in the Stuttgart Region of 7 February 1994]. Stuttgart: Gesetzesblatt für Baden-Württemberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., & Török, I. (2016). Metropolitan region policies in the European Union: Following national, European or neoliberal agendas? International Planning Studies, 22(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre, C. (2004). Paris et les Grandes Agglomérations Occidentales: Comparaison des Modèles de Gouvernance [Paris and the Major Western Agglomerations: Comparison of Governance Models]: Barcelona, Berlin, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Manchester, Milan, Montreal, Rome, Stuttgart, Toronto, Paris. Paris: Paris City Hall, Extramuros.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (Eds.) (2011). Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhtarov, F. (2014). Rethinking the travel of ideas: Policy translation in the water sector. Policy & Politics, 42(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payre, R. (2010). The importance of being connected: City networks and urban government—Lyon and Eurocities (1990-2005). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(2), 260–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrin, J., & Knieling, J. (2009). Das bildversprechen der metropolregion: Potenziale und risiken einer bildmächtigen raumkategorie [The image promise of the metropolitan region: The potentials and risks of a powerful spatial category]. In J. Knieling (Ed.), Metropolregionen: Innovation, Wettbewerb, Handlungsfähigkeit (pp. 300–322). Hannover: Verlag der ARL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinson, G., & Vion, A. (2000). L’internationalisation des villes comme objet d’expertise [The internationalization of cities as an object of expertise]. Pôle Sud, 13(1), 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, P. (2020). Learning from elsewhere? A critical account on the mobilisation of metropolitan policies. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 79–96). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, J. M. (2005). Re-placing the nation: An agenda for comparative urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 419–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldatos, P., & Michelmann, H. J. (1992). Subnational units? Paradiplomacy in the context of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 15(2–3), 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C., Michel, B., Glasze, G., & Pütz, R. (2017). Learning from failed policy mobilities: Contradictions, resistances and unintended outcomes in the transfer of ‘business improvement districts’ to Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2017). Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy & Politics, 45(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. B. (1987). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, K. (2020). From here to there: Mapping the metropolitan politics of policy mobilities. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 97–115). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carola Fricke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fricke, C. (2020). Implications of Metropolitan Policy Mobility: Tracing the Relevance of Travelling Ideas for Metropolitan Regions. In: Zimmermann, K., Galland, D., Harrison, J. (eds) Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics