Skip to main content
  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

Health is defined as a complete state of well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity; so the assessment of quality of life (QOL) has become a crucial aspect in the evaluation of patient outcome. ICU patients are at high risk of serious impairments after the discharge, and the impact on functional, physical and mental status can be dramatic. Many questionnaires have been so far used to determine QOL in ICU, but there are only poor reports which specifically focused this aspect in tracheostomized patients. The main difficulty to establish the influence of tracheotomy on QOL is the lack of specific instruments such as questionnaires which are able to distinguish the role of tracheostomy from the underlying disease and comorbidity when determining the psychological and functional status of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ridley SA, Chrispin PS, Scotton H, Rogers J, Lloyd D. Changes in quality of life after intensive care: comparison with normal data. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(3):195–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Sedrakyan A, Mendez Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Herridge MS, et al. Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(5):611–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-5 a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brazier JE, Walters SJ, Nicholl JP, et al. Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:195–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuthbertson BH, Scott J, Strachan M, et al. Quality of life before and after intensive care. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:332–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chrispin P, Scotton H, Rogers J, Llojd D, Ridley A. Short form 36 in the intensive care unit: assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:15–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham health profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A. 1981;15:221–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen D, Sellgren J, Ricksten SE. Quality of life after cardiac surgery complicated by multiple organ failure. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:52–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergner M, Bobbit R, Kressel S. The sickness impact profile: conceptual foundation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6:393–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tian Z, Miranda D. Quality of life after intensive care with the sickness impact profile. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21:422–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oeyen SG, Vandijck DM, Benoit DD, Annemans L, Decruyenaere JM. Quality of life after intensive care: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(12):2386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antonneli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, Conti G, Pennisi A, Arcangeli A, et al. Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized trial with 1-yr double blind follow-up. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1015–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bosel J, Schiller P, Hook Y, Andes M, Neumann JO, Poli S, Amiri H, Schonenberger S, et al. Stroke-related early tracheostomy versus prolonged orotracheal intubation in neurocritical care trial (SETPOINT). A randomized pilot trial. Stroke. 2013;44:21–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Engoren M, Engoren CA, Buderer NF. Hospital and long-term outcome after tracheostomy for respiratory failure. Chest. 2004;125:220–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vargas M, Servillo G, Arditi E, Brunetti I, Pecunia L, Salami D, Putensen C, Antonelli M, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy in intensive care unit: a national survey in Italy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:156–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Guenther U, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18:544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Silvester W, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Knight S, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fikkers BG, Staatsen M, van den Hoogen FJA, van der Hoeven JG. Early and late outcome after single step dilatational tracheostomy versus the guide wire dilating forceps technique: a retrospective randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koitschev A, Simon C, Blumenstock G, Mach H, Graumuller S. Suprastomal tracheal stenosis after dilatational and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:832–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Heurn LW, Goei R, de Ploeg I, Ramsay G, Brink PR. Late complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. Chest. 1996;110:1572–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Romero CA, Marambio A, Larrondo J, Walker K, Lira MT, Tobar E, et al. Swallowing dysfunction in non neurologic critically ill patients who require percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Chest. 2010;137(6):1278–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vargas, M., Servillo, G. (2020). Quality of Life and Complications After Percutaneous Tracheostomy. In: Esquinas, A., Vargas, N. (eds) Ventilatory Support and Oxygen Therapy in Elder, Palliative and End-of-Life Care Patients . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26664-6_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26664-6_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26663-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26664-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics