Skip to main content

Common Interests and Debates Between Durkheim and Westermarck

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animals in the Sociologies of Westermarck and Durkheim

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series ((PMAES))

  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses the debates Durkheim and Westermarck had, their common interests and differences in their views regarding the sociological methods, human morality and evolutionary theory. Durkheim’s and Westermarck’s ideas about morals are linked to their different views on the evolutionary ideas: Westermarck’s emphasis on human–animal continuity and shared origins of morals and Durkheim’s viewpoint, which highlighted qualitative uniqueness of human social life and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Durkheim 1980, 163–305; Lukes 1985/1973, 179, 407, 411–412.

  2. 2.

    French original: “Pour bien comprendre une pratique ou une institution, une règle juridique ou morale, il est nécessaire de remonter aussi près que possible de ses origines premières” (Durkheim 1896–1897/2006, 1) “La prohibition de l’inceste et ses origines” in Année Sociologique, vol. I.

  3. 3.

    About the debates between Durkheim and Westermarck see, for example, Durkheim 1912a/1915, 65; 1980, 150–159, 161–162, 184, 280–281; Westermarck 1891a/1921, 17–19, 21; 1891b/1925, 183–186, 198, 216; 1906b/1924, 143, 193, 196, 664; 1908b/1926, 263; 1932a, 6, 11, 16; 1932b/2010, 120, 191–192; 1939, 259; see also Ihanus 1990, 344; Lévi-Strauss 1982, 181, 187; Siikala 1998, 8; Stocking 1995, 162–163; Stroup 1982a, xi–xii; 1982b, 103–105.

  4. 4.

    This new introduction was apparently written after Durkheim’s death, but this does not show up in the text in any way. It is unclear if it is possible Westermarck had not heard about Durkheim’s premature death.

  5. 5.

    Westermarck 1891a/1921, 17–22.

  6. 6.

    The etymology of the word ‘evolution’ in Oxford Dictionaries, http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2015/05/evolution-etymology/. Accessed 5 Sep 2017.

  7. 7.

    Therborn 2000, 39, 44, 48; see also Corbey 2005, 23–24.

  8. 8.

    For example, Ayala 2007.

  9. 9.

    See Horigan 1988, 22, 88.

  10. 10.

    See Corbey 2005, 25; Fiddes 1991, 52–54; McGrane 1989, 78–88.

  11. 11.

    See, for example, Ayala 2007; Holdge and Radick 2003, 7; Waters 2003, 119.

  12. 12.

    See also Stroup 1982b, 40–41.

  13. 13.

    See, for example, Birke 1986, 129–131; Paul 2003.

  14. 14.

    Developmentalism refers to epistemological conceptions of social evolution that are historicist and rest on directional or developmental laws or unfolding models (Sanderson 2007, 33). Darwin, in turn, sees that evolution by natural selection is a non-directional historical process.

  15. 15.

    Necessitarianism means the metaphysical principle that there is exactly one way for the world to be.

  16. 16.

    Sanderson 2007, 27; see also Segerstråle 2000, 375.

  17. 17.

    See also Salmela 1989, 26; Siikala 1998, 10.

  18. 18.

    For example, Durkheim 2004, 100–114.

  19. 19.

    Neither Westermarck or Darwin, nor many current researchers of evolution and morals see that evolutionary theory would remove “essential” element(s) of moral life, including the impact of society on morals (see, e.g., Richards 2003).

  20. 20.

    Durkheim 2004, 110–114, 149–150.

  21. 21.

    Latour 1993, 100–101.

  22. 22.

    “Il est donc naturel que, pour la découvrir, nous nous adressions à des sociétés aussi rapprochées que possible des origines de l’évolution” (Durkheim Durkheim 1912c/2008, 92–93).

  23. 23.

    Durkheim 1982/1895, 92, 116; see also Lukes 1982, 9.

  24. 24.

    Durkheim calls Native Americans Indians (of North America) (Indiens de l’Amérique du Nord) or by the names of their tribes or groups of tribes, like Iroquois. He also uses words like primitives (primitifs) and savages (sauvages). Westermarck uses these same concepts. If we want to know about their attitudes towards these people, we have to analyse their texts more profoundly, as these concepts were still commonly used during their era.

  25. 25.

    Perrier is also the author of the Études sur l’organisation des Lombriciens Terrestres (1874) (Studies on the Organization of Terrestrial Earthworms), which is a study about annelida worms. Durkheim uses this book a lot in The Division of Labour in Society.

  26. 26.

    On Morality and Society—Selected Writings 1973, 149–163, orig. 1914.

References

  • Allardt, Erik (2000) Edward Westermarck: A Sociologist Relating Nature and Culture. Acta Sociologica, 43:4, 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, Francisco J. (2007) Darwin’s greatest discovery: Design without designer. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:1, 8567–8573. http://m.pnas.org/content/104/suppl_1/8567.full.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2017.

  • Berger, John (2009) Why look at animals? Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, Lynda (1986) Women, Feminism and Biology. The Feminist Challenge. Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall (1997) A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell. American Journal of Sociology. 102:6, 1558–1564. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/231126. Accessed 30 May 2017.

  • Corbey, Raymond (2005) The Metaphysics of Apes. Negotiating the Animal–Human Boundary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning, Peter A. (1982) Durkheim and Spencer. The British Journal of Sociology, 33:3, 359–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. The Project Gutenberg EBook. From the First Edition London: John Murray, Albermarle Street. Down, Bromley, Kent, October 1st, 1859. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1228/1228-h/1228-h.htm. Accessed 26 Jun 2019.

  • de Waal, Frans (2001) The Ape and The Sushi Master. Cultural reflections of a primatologist. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile [1883–1884] (2004) Durkheim’s Philosophy Lectures. Notes from the Lycée de Sens Course, 1883–1884. Edited and translated by Neil Gross and Robert Alun Jones. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile [1893 (1994)] The Division of Labour in Society. The Macmillan Press Ltd, London. First published 1984. Reprinted 1988, 1989, 1993, 1994. Originally published in French 1893 (De la division du travail social).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile [1895 (1982)] The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. Edited with an introduction by Steven Lukes. The Free Press, New York. Originally published in French 1895 (Les règles de la méthode sociologique).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile [1896–1897] (2006) La prohibition de l’inceste et ses origins. Année Sociologique, vol. I, 1–70. Une édition électronique réalisée à partir du texte d’Émile Durkheim (1896–1897), “La prohibition de l’inceste et ses origines” in Année sociologique, vol. I, 1896–1897, pp. 1 à 70, rubrique: “Mémoires originaux”.Paris: PUF. Texte reproduit dans Journal sociologique, pp. 37 à 101. Paris: PUF, 1969. Collection Bibliothèque de philosophie contemporaine. Édition électronique 2001. Édition complétée le 23 septembre 2002 à Chicoutimi, Québec. Vérification et correction le 1er novembre 2006. http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Durkheim_emile/annee_sociologique/an_socio_1/prohibition_inceste.pdf. Accessed 5 Sep 2017.

  • Durkheim, Émile [1912a (1915)] The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. George Allen & Unwind Ltd, London. Translated from the French by Joseph Ward Swain. Originally published in French 1912 (Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse). http://www.gutenberg.org/files/41360/41360-h/41360-h.htm. Accessed 30 May 2017.

  • Durkheim, Émile [1912b (2001)] The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. A new translation by Carol Cosman. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Originally published in French 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile [1912c (2008)] Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Le système totémique en Australie. Livre I: Questions préliminaires. Livre 1er (pp. 1-138 de l’édition papier). Paris, Les Presses universitaires de France, 1968, cinquième édition. Originally published in French in 1912. This edition published in Collection “Bibliothèque de philosophie contemporaine. Édition électronique. Édition complétée le 15 février 2002 par Jean-Marie Tremblay à Chicoutimi, Québec, revue, corrigée le 28 juin 2008. http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Durkheim_emile/formes_vie_religieuse/formes_elementaires_1.pdf. Accessed 5 Sep 2017

  • Durkheim, Émile (1973) On Morality and Society – Selected writings. Edited and with an introduction by Robert N. Bellah. The Heritage of Sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (1980) Contributions to L’Année Sociologique. Edited by Yash Nandan. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiddes, Nick (1991) Meat. A Natural Symbol. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdge, Jonathan & Radick, Gregory (eds.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horigan, Stephen (1988) Nature and culture in western discourses. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihanus, Juhani (1990) Kadonneet alkuperät. Edvard Westermarckin sosiopsykologinen ajattelu. Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Originally published in French 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1982) The Work of Edward Westermarck. In Timothy Stroup (ed.) Edward Westermarck: Essays on His Life and Works. Acta Philosophica Fennica vol 34: Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki. Originally published in French in Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 129, nos. 1 & 2–3 (January–June 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven (1982) Introduction. In Durkheim (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. The Free Press, New York. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven (1985) Émile Durkheim – His Life and Work. A Historical and Critical Study. Stanford University Press, Stanford. First published in 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrane, Bernard (1989) Beyond anthropology: society and the other. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionaries. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/. Accessed 5 Sep 2017.

  • Paul, Diane P. (2003) Darwin, social Darwinism and eugenics. In Holdge & Radick (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipping, Knut (1984) Who Reads Westermarck Today? The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 35, No. 3, 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Robert J. (2003) Darwin on mind, morals and emotions. In Holdge & Radick (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, Mikko (1989) Suomalaisen kulttuurifilosofian vuosisata. Otava, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, Stephen K. (2007) Evolutionism and Its Critics. Deconstructing and reconstructing an evolutionary interpretation of human society. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstråle, Ullica (2000) Defenders of the Truth. The Sociobiology Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siikala, Jukka (1998) Introduction. Ancestral Images and the Invention of New Ideas. In Jukka Siikala, Ulla Vuorela & Tapio Nisula (eds.) Developing Anthropological Ideas. The Edward Westermarck Memorial Lectures 1983–1997. Transactions of the Finnish Anthropological Society no. 41, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, George W. Junior (1995) After Tylor. British Social Anthropology 1888–1951. The University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, Timothy (ed.) (1982a) Edward Westermarck: Essays on his life and works. Acta Philosophica Fennica vol 34: Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, Timothy (1982b) Westermarck’s ethics. Meddelanden från stifteltens för Åbo Akademi forskningsinstitut nr 76. Åbo akademi, Åbo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, Timothy (1984) Edward Westermarck: A Reappraisal. In Man, New Series, 19:4, 575–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, Göran (2000) At the birth of second century sociology: times of reflexivity, spaces of identity, and nodes of knowledge. British Journal of Sociology, 51:1, 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, Kenneth C. (2003) The arguments in the Origin of Species. In Holdge & Radick (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward [1891a (1921)] The history of human marriage. Vol. 1. 5th ed. Rewritten. Macmillan and Co, London. First edition 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward [1891b (1925)] The history of human marriage. Vol. 3. 5th ed. Rewritten. Macmillan and Co, London. First edition 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward (1906a) The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. Vol. 1. Macmillan and co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward [1906b (1924)] The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. Vol. 1. Second edition. Macmillan and co., London. First edition 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward (1908a) The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. Vol. 2. Macmillan and co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward [1908b (1926)] The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. Vol. 2. Second edition. Macmillan and co. Ltd, London. First edition 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward (1932a) Early beliefs and their social influence. Macmillan and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward [1932b (2010)] Ethical Relativity. Routledge, Oxfordshire. The International Library of Philosophy. Originally published in London by Kegan Paul in 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward (1939) Christianity and morals. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tuomivaara, S. (2019). Common Interests and Debates Between Durkheim and Westermarck. In: Animals in the Sociologies of Westermarck and Durkheim. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26863-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics