Skip to main content

Smooth Sailing or a Risky Expedition: A Critical Exploration into the Innovation of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles and Its Potential Legal and Regulatory Impacts on the Insurance Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
InsurTech: A Legal and Regulatory View

Part of the book series: AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation ((ERSILR,volume 1))

  • 1722 Accesses

Abstract

Over the years, technology has continuously evolved to create new and innovative products that have a tremendous impact on global business, trade and commerce. In the transportation industry, technology has been developing and evolving to introduce various automatic vehicles. In the motor vehicle industry, many car manufacturers have been investing significantly in developing unmanned ground vehicles such as driverless cars and similarly in the airplane industry, unmanned aerial vehicles also known as drones have been flooding the consumer and commercial markets. It is thus unsurprising that in the maritime sector, several shipping manufacturers are currently exploring, developing and designing unmanned maritime vehicles also known as unmanned maritime vessels or autonomous vessels. These vessels sometimes colloquially referred to as “ghost ships” are expected to replace the need for a master and crew, which are traditionally found on conventional manned vessels. These vessels are expected to revolutionise the shipping industry in the very near future. As unmanned vessels are a relatively new phenomenon, there is not a large amount of academic discourse generally on the topic and as such very little has been written on its potential impacts specifically on the insurance sector globally.

This chapter embarks on a critical expedition into the innovation of unmanned maritime vehicles and its potential impacts on the insurance sector. To effectively do so, this chapter critically examines the benefits that can be derived from the use of unmanned vessels juxtaposed against the drawbacks to the insurance sector. This chapter also critically assesses the new risks posed to the maritime sector and the wider society from the use of unmanned vessels and proposes ways in which the insurance sector can develop products and policies or amend existing products and policies to lessen these risks. This chapter further critically discusses how the insurance sector should address the issue of liability as it relates to maritime incidents and accidents that are likely to arise from the use of unmanned maritime vehicles.

This chapter also embarks on a voyage that explores whether selected international maritime conventions are in their present state able to regulate unmanned maritime vehicles so as to afford protection to the relevant stakeholders. In this respect, the author also assesses whether these international conventions are in need of reforming or whether new international conventions need to be implemented so as to offer regulatory support to the insurance sector against the risks posed by unmanned vessels. In this respect, this chapter also examines how regulation at the national level can be used to assist the insurance sector manage the risks posed by unmanned shipping.

Additionally, this chapter further examines how traditional commercial maritime contracts such as the charter party and bill of ladings should be drafted to cover insurance related risks from unmanned maritime vehicles. Corollary to this, the author carefully considers whether in this respect, standard form charter parties are currently drafted in a manner so that they can be used for international trade occurring on unmanned vessels. The author also considers whether the relevant clauses of selected standard form charter parties are adequately drafted to address all the various risks unmanned vessels give rise to, and considers whether there needs to be new standard charter parties developed exclusively for trading by unmanned vessels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Leimbach et al. (2010), pp. 109–136.

  2. 2.

    Yeomans (2014).

  3. 3.

    ‘Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles’.

  4. 4.

    Danielle Muoio ‘These 19 companies are racing to put driverless cars on the road by 2020’ (Business Insider, 15 July 2016). http://www.businessinsider.com/google-apple-tesla-race-to-develop-driverless-cars-by-2020-2016-7#volvo-is-aiming-to-make-its-cars-deathproof-by-2020-by-rolling-out-semi-autonomous-features-in-its-cars-eventually-working-up-to-fully-driverless-ones-.

  5. 5.

    Springer (2013).

  6. 6.

    de Miguel Molina (2018).

  7. 7.

    Christian Matthews ‘Unmanned ‘ghost’ ships are coming’ (Independent, 6 September 2017) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ghost-ships-coming-yara-birkeland-norway-maritime-law-changing-fewer-accidents-cheaper-shipping-a7930481.html.

  8. 8.

    Simonsen Vogtwiig, ‘Maritime Law in the wake of the unmanned vessel’ https://svw.no/contentassets/f424f309bd304e99b39f11355e98571f/svw_maritime-law-in-the-wake-of-the-unmanned-vessel.pdf.

  9. 9.

    Simonsen Vogtwiig,‘Maritime Law in the wake of the unmanned vessel’ https://svw.no/contentassets/f424f309bd304e99b39f11355e98571f/svw_maritime-law-in-the-wake-of-the-unmanned-vessel.pdf.

  10. 10.

    European Commission Statistical Pocketbook 2017-‘ EU Transport in figures’ https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/pocketbook2017.pdf.

  11. 11.

    Alderton et al. (2004).

  12. 12.

    Captain George Quick ‘Would Autonomous Ships be good for Society?’ (Maritime Executive, 31 October, 2016) https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/would-autonomous-ships-be-good-for-society#gs.UeDHR2E.

  13. 13.

    Captain George Quick ‘Would Autonomous Ships be good for Society?’ (Maritime Executive, 31 October, 2016) https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/would-autonomous-ships-be-good-for-society#gs.UeDHR2E.

  14. 14.

    MUNIN ‘MUNIN Project web page’ http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/.

  15. 15.

    Ballin (2017).

  16. 16.

    Konsgsberg ‘Autonomous Ships’ https://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/4B8113B707A50A4FC125811D00407045?OpenDocument.

  17. 17.

    Konsgsberg ‘Autonomous Ships’ https://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/4B8113B707A50A4FC125811D00407045?OpenDocument.

  18. 18.

    Konsgsberg ‘Autonomous Ships’ https://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/4B8113B707A50A4FC125811D00407045?OpenDocument.

  19. 19.

    Konsgsberg ‘Autonomous Ships’ https://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/4B8113B707A50A4FC125811D00407045?OpenDocument.

  20. 20.

    Konsgsberg ‘Autonomous Ships’ https://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/4B8113B707A50A4FC125811D00407045?OpenDocument.

  21. 21.

    Ballin (2017).

  22. 22.

    Thomas Porathe, ‘Remote Monitoring and Control of Unmanned Vessels-The MUNIN Shore Control Centre’ (Chalmers Univ of Technology, Gothenburg/Sweden) http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/198197/local_198197.pdf.

  23. 23.

    Thomas Porathe, ‘Remote Monitoring and Control of Unmanned Vessels-The MUNIN Shore Control Centre’ (Chalmers Univ of Technology, Gothenburg/Sweden) http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/198197/local_198197.pdf.

  24. 24.

    MUNIN-‘MUNIN’s Objectives & Impact’ http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/about/munins-objectives/.

  25. 25.

    MUNIN-‘MUNIN’s Results’ http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/about/munin-results-2.

  26. 26.

    Rolls Royce-‘AAWA project introduces the project’s first commercial ship operators’ (12 April 2016) https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/our-stories/press-releases/2016/pr-12-04-2016-aawa-project-introduces-projects-first-commercial-operators.aspx.

  27. 27.

    Rolls Royce- ‘AAWA project introduces the project’s first commercial ship operators’ (12 April 2016) https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/our-stories/press-releases/2016/pr-12-04-2016-aawa-project-introduces-projects-first-commercial-operators.aspx.

  28. 28.

    Markus Laurinen, ‘Advanced Autonomous Waterborne Applications Initiative’ http://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/marine/ship-intel/12%20-%20AAWA%20Coordinator.pdf.

  29. 29.

    Markus Laurinen, ‘Advanced Autonomous Waterborne Applications Initiative’ http://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/marine/ship-intel/12%20-%20AAWA%20Coordinator.pdf.

  30. 30.

    Markus Laurinen, ‘Advanced Autonomous Waterborne Applications Initiative’ http://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/marine/ship-intel/12%20-%20AAWA%20Coordinator.pdf.

  31. 31.

    Van Hooydonk (2014).

  32. 32.

    Van Hooydonk (2014).

  33. 33.

    United Nations- ‘United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/oceans/unclos.

  34. 34.

    See the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay 10 December 1982).

  35. 35.

    International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978.

  36. 36.

    International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea 1972.

  37. 37.

    International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading.

  38. 38.

    International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (2002) Vol. 36.

  39. 39.

    Deketelaere (2017).

  40. 40.

    ibid.

  41. 41.

    Safety4Sea ‘Allianz: Human error behind 75 percent of marine casualties’ https://safety4sea.com/allianz-human-error-behind-75-percent-of-marine-casualties/.

  42. 42.

    ibid.

  43. 43.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  44. 44.

    Deketelaere (2017).

  45. 45.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  46. 46.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018 https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  47. 47.

    Lee Hong Liang, ‘The Economics of slow steaming’ (7 October 2014) http://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/americas/the-economics-of-slow-steaming.html.

  48. 48.

    Lee Hong Liang, ‘The Economics of slow steaming’ (7 October 2014) http://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/americas/the-economics-of-slow-steaming.html.

  49. 49.

    Lee Hong Liang, ‘The Economics of slow steaming’ (7 October 2014) http://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/americas/the-economics-of-slow-steaming.html.

  50. 50.

    See the Yara Birkeland currently being developed in Norway.

  51. 51.

    Asle Skredderberget, ‘The first ever zero emission, autonomous ship’ (YARA, 14 March 2018) https://www.yara.com/knowledge-grows/game-changer-for-the-environment/.

  52. 52.

    Harry Croome, ‘Autonomous & Crewless Ships-The Risks & Reality’ (24 October 2017) https://www.hemisphere-freight.com/autonomous-crewless-ships-are-there-risks-to-the-ocean-freight-industry/.

  53. 53.

    Bartleby ‘Air Pollution, Smog, Acid Rain, the Greenhouse Effect, and Ozone Depletion’ https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Air-Pollution-Smog-Acid-Rain-the-Greenhouse-F3CJKHPYTC.

  54. 54.

    ‘What is Sulphur Oxides or Sox air pollution from Ships?’ (Marine Insight, 21 July 2017) https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-law/what-is-sulphur-oxides-or-sox-air-pollution-from-ships/.

  55. 55.

    Mathieu (2016).

  56. 56.

    Mathieu (2016).

  57. 57.

    Alderton et al. (2004).

  58. 58.

    Mathieu (2016).

  59. 59.

    John Snyder ‘Autonomous vessels: Not so remote’ https://www.marinelog.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=26653:autonomous-vessels-not-so-remote&Itemid=257.

  60. 60.

    John Snyder ‘Autonomous vessels: Not so remote’ https://www.marinelog.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=26653:autonomous-vessels-not-so-remote&Itemid=257.

  61. 61.

    IUMI‘Global marine underwriting premiums continue to fall, reports IUMI (18 September 2017) https://iumi.com/news/press-releases/global-marine-underwriting-premiums-continue-to-fall-reports-iumi.

  62. 62.

    See the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay 10 December 1982).

  63. 63.

    See the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay 10 December 1982).

  64. 64.

    Geneva Convention of the High Seas ‘The Genuine Link’ http://www.armatorlerbirligi.org.tr/Sites/1/upload/files/THE_GENUINE_LINK.pdf.

  65. 65.

    See para 2.4 above.

  66. 66.

    See the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay 10 December 1982).

  67. 67.

    See the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay 10 December 1982).

  68. 68.

    The United Nations’ Convention on Condition for Registration of Ships 1986.

  69. 69.

    Article 11 of the United Nations’ Convention on Condition for Registration of Ships 1986.

  70. 70.

    Van Hooydonk (2014).

  71. 71.

    See Article 94 (3) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas 1994.

  72. 72.

    See Article 94 (4) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas 1994.

  73. 73.

    See Article 98 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1994.

  74. 74.

    Van Hooydonk (2014).

  75. 75.

    See the International Convention on Standards of Training Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) 1995.

  76. 76.

    Erik Kravets ‘Look beyond the flag’ (Maritime Executive, 23 March 2018) https://www.maritime-executive.com/magazine/look-beyond-the-flag.

  77. 77.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  78. 78.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  79. 79.

    Great Britain Law Commission (2012).

  80. 80.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  81. 81.

    de Vleeschhouwer (2017).

  82. 82.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  83. 83.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  84. 84.

    Deketelaere (2017).

  85. 85.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  86. 86.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  87. 87.

    Findlaw ‘What is product liability?’ https://injury.findlaw.com/product-liability/what-is-product-liability.html.

  88. 88.

    Stapleton (1994).

  89. 89.

    Stapleton (1994).

  90. 90.

    Dolman Law Group ‘3 Types of Product Liability Claims’ https://www.dolmanlaw.com/3-types-product-liability-claims/.

  91. 91.

    Dolman Law Group ‘3 Types of Product Liability Claims’ https://www.dolmanlaw.com/3-types-product-liability-claims/.

  92. 92.

    Ceyhun (2014).

  93. 93.

    Theodore Styliadis, Ioannis Koliousis ‘Shipping Accidents, damage assessment & accident consequences’ https://www.onthemosway.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ship-accidents-1final.pdf.

  94. 94.

    Deketelaere (2017).

  95. 95.

    Gurses (2015).

  96. 96.

    Giliker (2010).

  97. 97.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  98. 98.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  99. 99.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018 https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  100. 100.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  101. 101.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  102. 102.

    Jessica Maitra, ‘Unmanned Vessels and the Carriage of Goods-Contractual and Insurance Considerations’ (Clyde & Co., 18 January, 2018) https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/unmanned-vessels-and-the-carriage-of-goods-contractual-and-insurance-consid.

  103. 103.

    Antoniadou (2016).

  104. 104.

    English Oxford Living Dictionaries https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/charter_party.

  105. 105.

    Antoniadou (2016).

  106. 106.

    Rogers et al. (2016).

  107. 107.

    Rogers et al. (2016).

  108. 108.

    Antoniadou (2016).

  109. 109.

    Antoniadou (2016).

  110. 110.

    Baughen (2004).

  111. 111.

    Singh (2011).

  112. 112.

    See Part II, Clause 2 of the GENCON 94.

  113. 113.

    See clause 5 (c) of Part II of the GENCON 94.

  114. 114.

    See clause 5 (c) of Part II of the GENCON 94.

  115. 115.

    See clause 5 (b) of the GENCON 94.

  116. 116.

    See clause 5 (b) of the GENCON 94.

  117. 117.

    Rider clauses may be defined as a set of additional clauses which substitute or supplement a standard charter party. If a rider clause conflicts with a printed clause in a standard charter party, then the rider clause prevails.

  118. 118.

    See clause 5 (b) of the GENCON 94.

  119. 119.

    Soyer et al. (2017).

  120. 120.

    Antoniadou (2016).

  121. 121.

    See Article 2 of NYPE 1993.

  122. 122.

    See Article 2 of NYPE 2015.

  123. 123.

    Extensive research into the commercial use of autonomous vessels began as early as 2010. See Manda (2016).

  124. 124.

    See Article 2 of NYPE 2015.

  125. 125.

    See clause 7 of the NYPE 15.

  126. 126.

    See the NYPE 93.

  127. 127.

    See clause 39 if the NYPE 15.

  128. 128.

    See clause 39 (c) of the NYPE 15.

  129. 129.

    IMO ‘Stowaways’http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Facilitation/Stowaways/Pages/Default.aspx.

  130. 130.

    IMO ‘Stowaways’http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Facilitation/Stowaways/Pages/Default.aspx.

  131. 131.

    “Stowaways: the hidden problem at sea” (Ship Technology, 03 January 2017) https://www.ship-technology.com/features/featurestowaways-the-hidden-problem-at-sea-5708512/.

  132. 132.

    Fitzmaurice (2016).

  133. 133.

    The Nordic Association of Marine Insurers ‘Nordic Plan 2013’ http://www.cefor.no/Documents/Clauses/Nordic%20Plan%202013/2013/Brochure%20-%20Nordic%20Plan%202013.pdf.

  134. 134.

    The Nordic Association of Marine Insurers ‘Annual Reports’ http://www.cefor.no/Documents/Statistics/Annual%20reports/Cefor%20Annual%20Report%202016.pdf.

  135. 135.

    Thomas (2016).

  136. 136.

    Thomas (2016).

  137. 137.

    Noussia (2007).

  138. 138.

    Clarke et al. (2017).

  139. 139.

    See the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and compare same with Insurance Act 2015 of the UK.

  140. 140.

    See Section 2 (2) of the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906.

  141. 141.

    See Section 3 (1) of the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906.

  142. 142.

    See Section 2 (1) of the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906.

  143. 143.

    See Section 3 of the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906.

  144. 144.

    See Section 3 of the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906.

  145. 145.

    See Section 46 of the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906.

  146. 146.

    See Section 49 of the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906.

  147. 147.

    Merkin et al. (2014).

  148. 148.

    Trine-Lise Wilhelmsen, ‘The Nordic Marine Insurance Plan of 2013 Version 2016’http://www.nordicplan.org/The-Plan/Preface/.

  149. 149.

    See clause 2-1 of the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 Version 2016.

  150. 150.

    See clause 2-1 of the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 Version 2016.

  151. 151.

    See clause 2-1 of the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 Version 2016.

  152. 152.

    See clause 2-1 of the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 Version 2016.

  153. 153.

    See clause 2-8 of the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 Version 2016.

  154. 154.

    See Clause 2-9 of the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 Version 2016.

  155. 155.

    See Clause 3-29 of the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 Version 2016.

References

Table of Legislation

International Conventions

  • International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading

    Google Scholar 

  • International Convention on Standards of Training Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention on Condition for Registration of Ships 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay 10 December 1982)

    Google Scholar 

Commissioned Papers

  • The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 204 and The Scottish Law Commission Discussion Paper No 155:“Insurance Contract Law: The Business Insured’s Duty of Disclosure and the Law of Warranties.”

    Google Scholar 

Books, Journal Articles, Thesis

  • Alderton T et al (2004) The Global Seafarer: living and working conditions in a globalized industry, 1st edn. ILO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniadou N (2016) Charter parties- an outdated form of contract?. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Piraeus

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballin C (2017) Electric boats and ships-A history, 1st edn. McFarland & Company, Jefferson

    Google Scholar 

  • Baughen S (2004) Shipping law, 3rd edn. Cavendish, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceyhun GC (2014) The impact of shipping accidents on Marine Environment: a study of Turkish Seas. Eur Sci J 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M et al (2017) The Insurance Act 2015: a new regime for Commercial and Marine Insurance law, 1st edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vleeschhouwer S (2017) Safety of data. The risks of cyber security in the maritime sector. Netherlands Maritime Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Deketelaere P (2017) The legal challenges of unmanned vessels. M.Sc. thesis, University of Ghent

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice M (2016) The IMLI manual on international maritime law: shipping law, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Giliker P (2010) Vicarious liability in tort: a comparative perspective, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain Law Commission (2012) Insurance contract law: the business insured’s duty of disclosure and the law of warranties. Crown copyright

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurses O (2015) Marine insurance law, 1st edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (2002) Vol. 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimbach M et al (2010) Technological change and international trade-insights from REMIND-R. Energy J 31:109–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manda D (2016) Development of autonomous surface vessels for hydrographic survey applications. M.Sc. Thesis, University of New Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu B (2016) Unmanned vessels: a major challenge for the next decades. M.Sc. thesis, University of Ghent

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkin R et al (2014) Marine Insurance legislation, 5th edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Miguel Molina M (2018) Ethics and civil drones: European policies and proposals for the industry, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noussia K (2007) The principle of indemnity in marine insurance contracts: a comparative approach, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers A et al (2016) Cases and materials on the carriage of goods by sea, 4th edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh L (2011) The law of carriage of goods by sea, 1st edn. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Soyer B et al (2017) Charterparties: law, practice and emerging legal issues, 1st edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Springer PJ (2013) Military Robots and Drones: a reference handbook, 1st edn. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton J (1994) Product liability, 1st edn. Butterworths, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas R (2016) The modern law of Marine Insurance, 1st edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooydonk E (2014) The law of unmanned merchant shipping-an exploration. J Int Maritime Law 20:403–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans G (2014) Autonomous vehicles-handing over control: opportunities and risks for insurance. Lloyds Exposure Management

    Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trowers, S.N. (2020). Smooth Sailing or a Risky Expedition: A Critical Exploration into the Innovation of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles and Its Potential Legal and Regulatory Impacts on the Insurance Sector. In: Marano, P., Noussia, K. (eds) InsurTech: A Legal and Regulatory View. AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27386-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27386-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27385-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27386-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics