Skip to main content

Conclusions and Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unintended Consequences of Domestic Violence Law

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

  • 1144 Accesses

Abstract

This Chapter discusses three major conclusions from the research, their implications, and potential strategies for action. It summarises the overarching concern of the book: the current formulaic legal response to domestic and family violence replaces individual male power with state (White, male) power, over women. This is especially detrimental to Indigenous women and more so for those in remote communities. A paradigm shift in the current response to domestic and family violence to accommodate an intersectional analysis is called for. However, retaining the gains of the feminist movement towards achieving unequivocal state sanctions against patriarchal coercive control may be compromised, and remains a key challenge to reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). (2010). Social justice report 2009: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. Sydney, NSW: AHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. (2010). Emerging issues in domestic/family violence research (Research in Practice No. 10). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, L. (2003). Achieving social justice: Indigenous rights and Australia's future. Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H. (2008). Crime, aboriginality and the decolonisation of justice. Sydney: Hawkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H., Bluett-Boyd, N., & Williams, E. (2015). Innovative models in addressing violence against Indigenous women: State of knowledge paper (ANROWS Landscapes, 08/2015). Sydney: ANROWS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H., Williams, E., Cummings, E., Hovane, V., Torres, M., & Woodley, K. N. (2018). Innovative models in addressing violence against Indigenous women: Final report (ANROWS Horizons, 01/2018). Sydney: ANROWS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Cunneen, C., Schwartz, M., Stubbs, J., & Young, C. (2016). Justice reinvestment: Winding back imprisonment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Innovative Justice. (2015). Opportunities for early intervention: Bringing perpetrators of family violence into view. Melbourne: RMIT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T., Marchetti, E., & McNamara, L. (2016). Justice reinvestment: Winding back imprisonment [Book review by D. Brown, C. Cunneen, M. Schwartz, J. Stubbs, & C. Young]. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 28(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2011). The National Plan to reduce violence against women and their children 2010–2022. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, D. (2002). Transformative justice: Anti-subordination practices in cases of domestic violence. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cussen, T., & Bryant, W. (2015). Domestic/family homicide in Australia. In Research in Practice: No. 38 May 2015. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2002). Sexual assault and restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2008). Seeking justice in the 21st century: Towards an intersectional politics of justice. In H. V. Miller (Ed.), Restorative justice: From theory to practice (sociology of crime, law and deviance) (Vol. 11, pp. 3–30). San Antonio, TX: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K., & Stubbs, J. (2006). Feminist engagement with restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2009). A woman’s place …. Griffith Review, Edition 24: Participation Society, 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H., & Fitzgerald, R. (2018). The domestic violence protection order system as entry to the criminal justice system for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 7(3), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Paper presented at the Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, E., & Callan, S. (2012). Beyond violence: Breaking cycles of domestic violence: A policy report for the Centre for Social Justice. London: Centre for Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, M. (2003). Deconstructing the culture of sexual assault: Violence prevention education among men. Conference paper presented at Practice and Prevention: Contemporary Issues in Adult Sexual Assault in New South Wales, University of Technology, Sydney. Retrieved January 10, 2014, from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/39933/20040202-0000/www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/cpd.nsf/files/flood.pdf/$FILE/flood.pdf.

  • Goodmark, L. (2012). A troubled marriage: Domestic violence and the legal system. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodmark, L. (2018). Decriminalizing domestic violence: A balanced policy approach to intimate partner violence. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (1998). Restorative justice: The challenge of sexual and racial violence. Journal of Law and Society, 25(2), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2002). Restorative justice and gendered violence: Diversion or effective justice? British Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.3.616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2002) Using restorative justice principles to address family violence in Aboriginal communities. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence (pp. 206–222). Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2018). Maranguka justice reinvestment project impact assessment. Sydney: Maranguka and Just Reinvest NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, E., Gibson, A., Lam, H., & Beecham, D. (2015). Perpetrator interventions in Australia: Part oneLiterature review. State of knowledge paper (ANROWS Horizons 01/2015). Sydney: ANROWS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E. (2010). Indigenous sentencing courts and partner violence: Perspectives of court practitioners and Elders on gender power imbalances during the sentencing hearing. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(2), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E. (2015). An Australian Indigenous-focused justice response to intimate partner violence: Offenders perceptions of the sentencing process. British Journal of Criminology, 55(1), 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E. (2019). Indigenous courts, cultures and partner violence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E., & Daly, K. (2017). Indigenous partner violence, Indigenous sentencing courts, and pathways to desistance. Violence Against Women, 23(12) 1513–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, A., & Comaskey, B. (1999). Black eyes all of the time: Intimate violence, Aboriginal women and the justice system. London: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosby, E., & Thomsen, G. (2014). Gatharr Weyebe Banabe program: Seeking behaviour change in Indigenous family violence. The No To Violence Journal, (Spring), 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, H. (2006). In search of justice for domestic and family violence: Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women’s perspectives. Theoretical Criminology, 10(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, H. (2010). Restorative justice for domestic and family violence: Hopes and fears of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women. In J. Ptacek (Ed.), Restorative justice and violence against women (pp. 123–149). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, H. (2016). Legal responses to intimate partner violence: Gendered aspirations and racialised realities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Griffith University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples. (2016). The Redfern statement. Retrieved from http://nationalcongress.com.au/the-redfern-statement/ on 16 June 2016.

  • No To Violence & Red Tree Consulting. (2012). Towards safe families: A practice guide for men’s domestic violence behaviour change programs. Sydney: NSW Department of Attorney General and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Our Watch. (2018). Changing the picture: A national resource to support the prevention of violence against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their children. Melbourne: Our Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Our Watch, ANROWS, & VicHealth. (2015). Change the story: A shared framework for the primary prevention of violence against women and their children in Australia. Melbourne: Our Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respect. (2015). Respect briefing paper: Evidence base for interventions with domestic violence perpetrators. London: Respect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, B. (2000). The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women’s task force on violence report. Brisbane: Queensland Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., Brown, D. B., & Boseley, L. (2012, June 6). The promise of justice reinvestment. Retrieved May 16, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2078715.

  • Sherman, L. W. (1995). Domestic violence and defiance theory. In D. Chappel & S. Egger (Eds.), Australian violence: Contemporary perspectives II (pp. 207–220). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2006). Commentary on Johnson’s “conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence”. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. (1994). Women, male violence and the law. Sydney: The Institute of Criminology, Sydney University Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. (2002). Domestic violence and women’s safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SuccessWorks. (2009). Review of the integrated response to family violence: Final report. Hobart: Department of Justice, Tasmanian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangmann, J. (2009). ‘She said…’ ‘he said…’: Cross applications in NSW apprehended domestic violence order proceedings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Faculty of Law), University of Sydney, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, I. (1997). ‘Indigenous peoples’ law-ways: Survival against the colonial state. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 39, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Nancarrow .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nancarrow, H. (2019). Conclusions and Implications. In: Unintended Consequences of Domestic Violence Law. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27500-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27500-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27499-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27500-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics