Abstract
Building on insights from the Murdoch School, this chapter provides an analysis of the political economy of extractive industries in Southeast Asia, emphasising how multi-scalar politics have shaped specific modes of governance in the sector, and in turn, regional development outcomes. It provides an overview of the region’s extractive industries’ production, exploring how domestic and international power struggles have influenced modes of governance in the sector and the socio-environmental ramifications of this. It also analyses the emerging contestation of the neoliberal norms forged by pro-extractive industry interests.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While there are good reasons to expand the definition of extractive industries to include all extractive-linked activities (such as fisheries, logging or mono-cropping), given space limitations this chapter will exclusively focus on oil, gas and minerals. For a thorough analysis of land and environmental issues, see the chapters by Hirsch and Gellert, respectively, in this volume.
- 2.
By nickel content of mine output or 45% of the metal/refined nickel.
- 3.
Used mainly in glass-making and ceramics.
- 4.
Used mainly as a fertilizer and as the main constituent in forms of plaster, blackboard chalk and wallboard.
- 5.
Mixed with other metals, it is used mainly to form low-melting alloys.
- 6.
Data for Cambodia are unavailable, but ASM of gold and rubies is taking place.
- 7.
This is mainly low-rank thermal coal exported to China and India for use in power stations.
- 8.
Natural resource rents have never exceeded 1% of GDP in Singapore and 5% in the Philippines and Thailand, so they are excluded.
- 9.
State corporations, including Pertamina (oil), Timah (tin mining), Aneka Tambang (mining) and Inhutani (forestry), were “essentially the terminals through which the state establishes production and work sharing agreements with the foreign companies which make the bulk of investments and carry out production” (Robison 2009: 217).
- 10.
- 11.
The Philippines was once one of the world’s top exporters of copper and gold but by the turn of the twenty-first century, its production had declined significantly.
- 12.
In 1993, the Philippines’ total debt servicing cost was just under 9% of its gross national income (World Bank Data 2019a).
- 13.
See, e.g. ASEAN (2016). For a discussion on regulatory regionalism, see Jones and Hameiri, this volume.
- 14.
The race for Asia’s resources was also fed by the depletion of mineral reserves in other regions of the world, which raised commodity prices in the first decade of the 2000s, and by new technologies that allowed investors to venture further into previously untapped markets.
- 15.
For an analysis of resource politics in Asia-Pacific, see Wilson (2017).
- 16.
2014 is the most recent year for which USGS data are available.
- 17.
These include Rio Tinto, Barrick Gold, BHP Billiton, MMG, Glencore Xstrata, Gold Fields, Newmont, Newcrest, Anglo American and Vale.
- 18.
Myanmar embarked on legal and regulatory reform of its extractive industries in 2011.
- 19.
Well beyond Southeast Asia, human rights reports are bleak for extractive industries. Global Witness highlights that in 2017 alone, 197 environmental activists were murdered, four times the number estimated for 2002 (cited in Watts 2018). Crucially, the non-profit organisation reports that extractive industries were one of the top drivers of such violence (ibid.).
- 20.
In Southeast Asia, the following countries have joined the EITI: Indonesia (in 2010), Myanmar (in 2014), the Philippines (in 2013) and Timor-Leste (in 2008).
- 21.
The implementation of these standards is required for any project in which the IFC invests. However, the standards have since been adopted by several public and private companies on a voluntary basis and are now considered the de facto global standard (see Dashwood 2013).
References
ADB [Asian Development Bank]. (2007). Philippines: Critical development constraints. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
ASEAN. (2016). ASEAN Minerals Cooperation Action Plan 2016–2025 (AMCAP-III): Phase (2016–2020). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
Balaton-Chrimes, S., & Macdonald, K. (2016). The compliance advisor ombudsman for the IFC/MIGA: Evaluating potential for human rights remedy (Non-judicial redress mechanisms report series 17). http://corporateaccountabilityresearch.net/njm-report-xvii-cao. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
Bebbington, A., Hinojosa, J., Bebbington, D., Burneo, M. L., & Warnaars, X. (2008). Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and Change, 39(6), 887–914.
Belem, G. (2009). Mining, poverty reduction, the protection of the environment and the role of the World Bank Group in Mali. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Mining in Africa: Regulation and development (pp. 119–149). New York: Pluto Press.
Bello, W., Docena, H., de Guzman, M., & Maliq, M. L. (2004). The anti-development state: The political economy of permanent crisis in the Philippines. London: Zed Books.
BIC [Bank Information Centre], Bretton Woods Project, Earthworks, Oxfam International, & Campagna per la Riform della Banca Mondiale. (2006). The World Bank Group’s gold mining operations. Tarnished gold: Mining and the unmet promise of development. www.bicusa.org/proxy/Document.9518.aspx. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
Campbell, B. (Ed.). (2004). Regulating mining in Africa: For whose benefit? (Discussion paper no. 26). Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
Campbell, B. (Ed.). (2009). Mining in Africa. Regulation and development. London/Ottawa/Uppsala: Pluto/IDRC/Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
Campbell, B. (Ed.). (2013). Modes of governance and revenue flows in African mining. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Campbell, B., & Laforce, M. (2016). La responsabilité sociale des entreprises dans le secteur minier [Corporate social responsibility in the mining sector]. Montreal: Presses de l’Universite du Quebec.
Carroll, T. (2010). Delusions of development: The World Bank and the post-Washington consensus in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cornish, G., & Vivoda, V. (2016). Myanmar’s extractive industries: An institutional and regulatory assessment. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3, 1075–1083.
Coumans, C. (2011). Whose development? Mining, local resistance, and development agendas. In J. Sagebien & N. M. Lindsay (Eds.), Governance ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American mining sector (pp. 114–132). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dashwood, H. S. (2013). Sustainable development and industry self-regulation. Business & Society, 53(4), 551–582.
Doyle, C., Wicks, C., & Nally, F. (2006). Mining in the Philippines: Concerns and conflicts. Report of a fact-finding trip to the Philippines. Knowle: Society of St. Columban.
EIR [Extractive Industries Review]. (2003). Striking a better balance. Vol 1: The World Bank and the extractive industries. The final report of the extractive industries review. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
EITI [Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative]. (2018). Indonesia. Extractive industries transparency initiative. https://eiti.org/indonesia. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
Gagné-Ouellet, S. (2012). Regulatory framework revision and mining regime reform in Mali: Degrees of rupture and continuity. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Modes of governance and revenue flows in African mining (pp. 47–100). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gellert, P. K. (2010). Extractive regimes: Toward a better understanding of Indonesian development. Rural Sociology, 75(1), 28–57.
Gill, S. (1995). Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(3), 399–423.
Hatcher, P. (2014). Regimes of risk: The World Bank and the transformation of mining in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hatcher, P. (2016). Le boom minier de la Mongolie et la montée du nationalisme des ressources: Tensions politiques, promesses électorales et normes néolibérales [The Mongolian mining boom and the rise of resource nationalism: Political tensions, electoral promises and neoliberal norms]. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 37(4), 466–483.
Holden, W. N. (2005). Civil society opposition to nonferrous metals mining in the Philippines. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 16(3), 223–249.
Human Rights Watch. (2016, February 10). Human rights shouldn’t be sidelined at ASEAN summit. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/02/10/human-rights-shouldnt-be-sidelined-asean-summit. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
IBRD, & IFC [International Bank of Reconstruction and Development & International Finance Corporation]. (1999). Philippines: Country assistance strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
ICMM. (2017). ICMM 10 principles. International council on mining and metals. https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/about-us/member-commitments/icmm-10-principles. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
IGF. (2017). Global trends in artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM): A review of key numbers and issues. Intergovernmental forum on mining, minerals, metals and sustainable development. Winnipeg: IISD.
Jayasuriya, K. (2003). Civil society, regulatory state and the new anti-politics. Murdoch: Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University.
Kemp, D., & Owen, R. (2017). Grievance handling at a foreign-owned mine in Southeast Asia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(1), 131–139.
Leith, D. (2002). Freeport and the Suharto regime, 1965–1998. The Contemporary Pacific, 14(1), 69–100.
Munthe, B. C., & Jensen, F. (2018, May 24). Distraction or disaster? Freeport’s giant Indonesian mine haunted by audit report. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-indonesia-freeport-environment-analys/distraction-or-disaster-freeports-giant-indonesian-mine-haunted-by-audit-report-idUSKCN1IP1H5. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
Naito, K., Otto, J., & Eggert, R. G. (1998) Mineral investment risk and opportunities in Asia. Resources Policy, 24(2), 77–78.
Nettleton, G., Whitmore, A., & Glennie, J. (2004). Breaking promises, making profits: Mining in the Philippines. London: Christian Aid and Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links.
Robison, R. (2009). Indonesia: The rise of capital. Reprint. Singapore: Equinox Publishing.
SAPRIN. (2001). The impact of investment liberalization and the Mining Act of 1995 on indigenous peoples, upland communities and the rural poor, and on the environment: A summary report. Manila: Structural Adjustment Participatory Review International Network.
Szablowski, D. (2007). Transnational law and local struggles: Mining, communities and the World Bank. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Taylor, N. A. J. (2011, October 19). West Papua: A history of exploitation. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/08/201182814172453998.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2019.
USGS [United States Geological Survey]. (1996). The mineral industries of Asia and the Pacific. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (1997). The mineral industries of Asia and the Pacific. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (2012). 2010 minerals yearbook: Asia and the Pacific. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/country/asia.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
USGS. (2016). 2013 minerals yearbook: Asia and the Pacific. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (2017). 2014 minerals yearbook: Asia and the Pacific. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (2018a). 2015 minerals yearbook: Philippines (advance release). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (2018b). 2015 minerals yearbook: Malaysia (advance release). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (2018c). 2015 minerals yearbook: Timor-Leste (advance release). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (2018d). 2015 minerals yearbook: Thailand (advance release). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
USGS. (2018e). 2015 minerals yearbook: Vietnam (advance release). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey-Minerals Information.
Venzon, C. (2018, August 25). Flare-up of resource nationalism burns miners across Asia. Nikkei Asian Review. https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Commodities/Flare-up-of-resource-nationalism-burns-miners-across-Asia. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
Watts, J. (2018, February 2). Almost four environmental defenders a week killed in 2017. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/feb/02/almost-four-environmental-defenders-a-week-killed-in-2017. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
Wilson, J. D. (2017). International resource politics in the Asia-Pacific: The political economy of conflict and cooperation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
World Bank. (2005). Extractive industries and sustainable development: An evaluation of World Bank Group experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2012). The World Bank Group in extractive industries: 2012 annual review. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2013). Mining: Sector results profile. http://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2013/04/14/mining-results-profile. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
World Bank Data. (2019a). The Philippines: Total debt service (% of GNI). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.TDS.DECT.GN.ZS?locations=PH. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
World Bank Data. (2019b). Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). https://data.worldbank.org/topic/energy-and-mining?contextual=region&end=2016&locations=4E&start=1975. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
World Energy Council. (2016). Southeast Asia and the Pacific. https://www.worldenergy.org/data/resources/region/southeast-asia-pacific/oil/. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hatcher, P. (2020). The Political Economy of Southeast Asia’s Extractive Industries: Governance, Power Struggles and Development Outcomes. In: Carroll, T., Hameiri, S., Jones, L. (eds) The Political Economy of Southeast Asia. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28255-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28255-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28254-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28255-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)