Skip to main content
  • 3011 Accesses

Abstract

The motivation for learning and mastering CFD and turbulence modeling is based on their ever-increasing potential to solve problems, especially those that cannot be resolved experimentally due to physical limitations, economic cost, safety, time constraints, or environmental regulatory procedures. Current and future employment trends, computational capacity growth, and experimentation costs favor CFD. The integration of CFD, theory, advanced manufacturing, and experiments will lead towards even more economical and faster development of prototypes and systems for more streamlined concept-to-market development. As Moore’s law eventually ceases to apply, quantum and nano-computing devices, as well as quantum algorithms, will continue the computational growth trend for many decades to come, if not centuries. The near future holds the potential for simulations that are thousands of times faster than is currently feasible. This fascinating subject is elaborated further in Sect. 5.2.

Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life. —Confucius

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abney, A., et al. (2013). Hypersonic boundary-layer transition experiments in the Boeing/AFOSR Mach-6 Quiet Tunnel, 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfonsi, G. (2011). On direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows. ASME, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 64, 020802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (1995). Computational fluid dynamics: The basics with applications. New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, B., et al. (2012). Computational fluid dynamics for engineers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AT Kearney. (2015). 3D printing: A manufacturing revolution. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (pp. 1--16). Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babinsky, H., & Edwards, J. A. (1997). Large scale roughness influence on turbulent hypersonic boundary layers approaching compression corners. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 34(1), 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. (2002). Applied computational fluid dynamics, Lecture 1, Introduction to CFD, www.bakker.org

  • Cheng, R. (2008). Low-swirl burner for heating & power generation. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. A., Ferziger, J. H., & Reynolds, W. C. (1979). Evaluation of subgrid-scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 91(Part 1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • College Grad. https://collegegrad.com/careers/all.shtml. Accessed on 16 May 2017.

  • DOE STI. SuperTruck initiative. https://energy.gov/eere/articles/supertruck-making-leaps-fuel-efficiency, https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/06/f33/EERE_SuperTruck_FS_R121%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed on 16 May 2017.

  • Ferziger, J., & Peric, M. (2002). Computational methods for fluid dynamics (3rd ed.). Berlin/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, J. (1987). Turbulence (McGraw-Hill classic textbook reissue series). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontis, K., & Lada, C. (2005). Flow control effectiveness at high speed flows, Proceedings of the fifth European symposium on aerothermodynamics for space vehicles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontis, K., Lada, C., & Zare-Behtash, H. (2008). Effect of dimples on glancing shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions. Shock Waves, 17, 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S., & Chen, A. (2017). Advanced fire sprinkler design and validation. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S., Grieb, N., & Chen, A. (2017). Dimpling aerodynamics for a Ford Mustang GT, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2017-6522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinger, K. (2017). Quantum computing is and is not amazing, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2017-7067C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, M., & Naik, B. A. (2011). Dimples – An effective way to improve in performance, The first international conference on interdisciplinary research and development, Thailand, May 31 through June 1, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • SimScale. The SimScale home page. www.simscale.com. Accessed on 16 May 2017.

  • Singer, N. (2019). Quantum computing steps further ahead with new projects. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories, Sandia LabNews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. C. (2006 k-𝜔 model). Turbulence modeling for CFD, 3rd Ed., La Cañada: DCW Industries, printed on 2006 and 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rodriguez, S. (2019). Introduction. In: Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics and Turbulence Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28691-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics