Skip to main content

Assessing the Quality Impact of Features in Component-Based Software Architectures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Architecture (ECSA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11681))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In modern software development processes, existing software components are increasingly used to implement functionality instead of developing it from scratch. Reuse of individual components or even more complex subsystems leads to more cost-efficient development and higher quality of software. Subsystems often offer a variety of features whose use is associated with unclear effects on the quality attributes of the software architecture, such as performance. It is unclear, whether the quality requirements for the system can be met by using a certain feature of a particular subsystem. After initial selection, features must be incorporated in the target architecture. Due to a multitude of possibilities of placing the subsystem in the target system to be used, many architectural candidates may result which have to be evaluated in existing decision support solutions. The approach presented here enables software architects to automatically evaluate with the help of software architecture models the effects on quality of using individual features in an existing software architecture. The result helps to automatically evaluate design decisions regarding features and to decide whether their use is compatible with the quality requirements. We show the benefits of our approach using different decision scenarios driven by features and their placement alternatives. All scenarios are automatically evaluated, demonstrating how decisions can be made to best meet the requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please note that the approach is not limited to systems that build on each other and are related in their architecture.

References

  1. Aleti, A., Bjornander, S., Grunske, L., Meedeniya, I.: ArcheOpterix: an extendable tool for architecture optimization of AADL models. In: MOMPES 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andres, C., Camacho, C., Llana, L.: A formal framework for software product lines. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55, 1925–1947 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, C., et al.: Component-Based Product Line Engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Klein, M., Shelton, C.: Designing software architectures to achieve quality attribute requirements. In: SW Proceedings (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayer, J., et al.: PuLSE: a methodology to develop software product lines. In: SSR 1999, ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch, J.: Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-line Approach. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Busch, A., Schneider, Y., Koziolek, A., et al.: Modelling the structure of reusable solutions for architecture-based quality evaluation. In: CloudSPD 2016. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eckert, M.: Konditionale Platzierung von Architekturelementen zur Optimierung von Software-Architekt. Master’s thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koziolek, A.: Automated Improvement of Software Architecture Models for Performance and Other Quality Attributes. KIT, Karlsruhe (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koziolek, A., Koziolek, H., et al.: PerOpteryx: automated application of tactics in multi-objective software architecture optimization. In: QoSA-ISARCS 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martens, A., Koziolek, H., et al.: Automatically improve software models for performance, reliability and cost using genetic algorithms. In: WOSP/SIPEW ICPE 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reussner, R.H., Becker, S.: Modeling and Simulating Software Architectures: The Palladio Approach. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vogel, T.: mRUBiS: an exemplar for model-based architectural self-healing and self-optimization. In: SEAMS 2018. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, D.M., Lai, C.T.R.: Software Product-line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Axel Busch or Anne Koziolek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Busch, A., Fuchß, D., Eckert, M., Koziolek, A. (2019). Assessing the Quality Impact of Features in Component-Based Software Architectures. In: Bures, T., Duchien, L., Inverardi, P. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11681. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29983-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29983-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29982-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29983-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics