Abstract
Evidence-based risk assessment is needed to develop effective strategies for the prevention of occupational cancer. Cancer risk assessment is based on valid estimates of the dose–risk relationship, and on realistic estimates of exposure levels in different occupational settings. One example of classification that includes the possibility of nonlinear dose–risk relationships with a threshold is that developed by the European Commission. Occupational tumors do not differ clinically or pathologically from those of other origins and can be divided into two categories: neoplasms with a clearly identified cause linked to employment, and the larger group of tumors for which both occupational and nonoccupational causes are known. The diagnosis of occupational cancer, which is important not only from the clinical perspective, but also from a legal and compensation point of view, is complex and may satisfy specific diagnostic criteria, as illustrated by the example of malignant mesothelioma. Prevention of occupational cancer comprises primary interventions aimed at the elimination or containment of risk, as well as secondary and tertiary interventions aimed at the early identification of conditions that could result in illnesses or, if the disease is established, to contain its effects with early interventions that limit its progression and improve prognosis. The role of the occupational physician is crucial in these interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rushton L, Hutchings SJ, Fortunato L, et al. Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(Suppl 1):S3–7.
Boffetta P, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. An estimate of cancers attributable to occupational exposures in France. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:399–406.
Bolt HM, Huici-Montagud A. Strategy of the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens. Arch Toxicol. 2008;82:61–4.
Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL). Methodology for the derivation of occupational exposure limits: key documentation. Brussels: European Commission; 2013.
Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL). Recommendation from the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for cadmium and its inorganic compounds (SCOEL/SUM/136). Brussels: European Commission; 2010.
European Parliament and Council. Regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, 18 Dec 2006. L396, 30.12.2006. p. 1–849.
Husain AN, Colby TV, Ordóñez NG, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma – a consensus statement from the international mesothelioma interest group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1317–31.
[Recommendations of the Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française on pleural mesothelioma]. Rev Mal Respir. 2006;23:11S7–104 [Article in French].
Suzuki Y. Pathology of human malignant mesothelioma. Semin Oncol. 1981;8:268–82.
Ordoñez NG. What are the current best immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of epitheliod mesothelioma? A review and update. Human Pathol. 2007;38:1–16.
Ordoñez NG. The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma: a comparative study of epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1031–51.
Kanekar AS. HIV/AIDS Counseling skills and strategies: can testing and counseling curb the epidemic? Int J Prev Med. 2011;2:10–4.
Alcántara C, Klesges LM, Resnicow K, et al. Enhancing the evidence for behavioral counseling: a perspective from the Society of Behavioral Medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(Suppl 2):S184–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pira, E., Garzaro, G., Ciocan, C., Boffetta, P. (2020). Occupational Cancer in the Practice of Occupational Medicine. In: Anttila, S., Boffetta, P. (eds) Occupational Cancers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30766-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30766-0_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30765-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30766-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)