Skip to main content

We Have Always Already Been Becoming Posthuman? Posthumanism in Theory and (Reading) Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Approaches to the Twenty-First-Century Anglophone Novel

Abstract

This chapter introduces key ideas and crucial questions concerning the recent debates about posthumanist theory and its implications for reading the novel. After a brief introduction to philosophical posthumanism, it discusses two literary works, Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake (2003) and J. M. Coetzee’s Slow Man (2005), and outlines ways of approaching what is described as a “literary posthumanism” by engaging with questions of form and genre as well as the role of embodiment and creaturely vulnerability for writing and reading novels. Literary posthumanism can be understood both as a challenge of traditional forms of representation and as a call for new forms of interpretation and thus showcases the potential of the novel to stage, negotiate and, ultimately, reconfigure the meaning of concepts such as human exceptionalism, narrative, and art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Attridge, Derek. 2004. J.M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, Margaret. 2003. Oryx and Crake. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartosch, Roman. 2012. “Literary Quality and the Ethics of Reading: Some Thoughts on Literary Evolution and the Fiction of Margaret Atwood, Ilija Trojanow and Ian McEwan.” In Literature, Ecology, Ethics. Recent Trends in Ecocriticism, edited by Timo Müller and Michael Sauter, 113–28. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. EnvironMentality. Ecocriticism and the Event of Postcolonial Fiction. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. “Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology.” Theory, Culture & Society 23: 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Bruce. 2017. “The Nonhuman.” In The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman, edited by Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini, 141–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Bruce, and Manuela Rossini, eds. 2017. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, J. M. 2006. Slow Man. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. 2010. “Introducing the New Materialisms.” In New Materialisms. Ontology, Agency, and Politics, edited by Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, 1–43. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, Helena. 2014. “Ecocriticism, Posthumanism, and the Biological Idea of Culture.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism, edited by Greg Garrard, 225–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2002. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Jens Martin. 2007. “Function of Intertextuality and Metafiction in J.M. Coetzee’s Slow Man.” Anglistik 18 (1): 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, Ihab. 1977. “Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture?” The Georgia Review 31 (4): 830–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, Dominic. 2009. The Cambridge Introduction to J.M. Coetzee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, Stefan. 2013. Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. “Postmodern.” In The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Posthuman, edited by Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini, 54–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David. 2014. “Narratology Beyond the Human.” Diegesis 3 (2): 131–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2016. Creatural Fictions. Human-Animal Relationships in Twentieth- and Twenty-first-Century Literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, Veronica. 2009. “Posthumanism and Cyborg Theory.” In The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction, edited by Mark Bould, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts, and Sherryl Vint, 267–78. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns-Putra, Adeline. 2018. “The Rest is Silence: Postmodern and Postcolonial Possibilities in Climate Change Fiction.” Studies in the Novel 50 (1): 26–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, Suzanne. 2007. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte, Barbara. 2008. “Women’s Views of Last Men: Mary Shelley’s The Last Man and Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” In Reading(s) from a Distance. European Perspectives on Canadian Women’s Writing, edited by Charlotte Sturgess and Martin Kuester, 152–65. Augsburg: Wißner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. An Anthropology of the Moderns. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchesini, Roberto. 2017. Over the Human: Post-humanism and the Concept of Animal Epiphany. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar, Pramod. 2013. Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohrem, Dominik. 2017. “An Address from Elsewhere: Vulnerability, Relationality, and Conceptions of Creaturely Embodiment.” In Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. Creaturely Lives in Literature and Culture, edited by Dominik Ohrem and Roman Bartosch, 43–75. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohrem, Dominik, and Roman Bartosch, eds. 2017. Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. Creaturely Lives in Literature and Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Helena. 2010. “Is ‘the Posthuman’ Educable? On the Convergence of Educational Philosophy, Animal Studies, and Posthumanist Theory.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 31 (2): 237–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Christopher. 2011. “The Posthumanism to Come.” Angelaki – Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 16 (2): 127–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santner, Eric. 2006. On Creaturely Life: Rilke, Benjamin, Sebald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, Nathan, and John Weaver, eds. 2014. Posthumanism and Educational Research. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, Karl. 2017. “Medieval.” In The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Posthuman, edited by Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, Pieter. 2014. “Posthuman Affect.” European Journal of English Studies 18 (2): 121–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Contemporary Literature and the End of the Novel. Creature, Affect, Form. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilm, Jan. 2016. The Slow Philosophy of J.M. Coetzee. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Cary. 2010. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaszek, Lisa, and Jason W. Ellis. 2017. “Science Fiction.” In The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Posthuman, edited by Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini, 71–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, Hubert. 2016. Literature as Cultural Ecology. Sustainable Texts. London: Blo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman Bartosch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bartosch, R. (2019). We Have Always Already Been Becoming Posthuman? Posthumanism in Theory and (Reading) Practice. In: Baumbach, S., Neumann, B. (eds) New Approaches to the Twenty-First-Century Anglophone Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32598-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics