Skip to main content

The Concept of Ecological Rationality and Its Application to Spatial Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecological Rationality in Spatial Planning

Part of the book series: Cities and Nature ((CITIES))

  • 505 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we address the different forms of rationality drawing from insights of political science. Five main forms of rationality are examined––technical, economic, legal, social and political—and their relevance for spatial planning is discussed. The main limitations of such forms of rationality are analysed. We then describe the main characteristics of ecosystems and landscapes drawing from system theory and identify their key emerging properties—interdependence, complexity, self-organization, openness, adaptation, homeostasis, resilience, diversity and creation of order. The concept of Ecological Rationality—informed by such principles—is introduced and discussed. This can be defined as a form of thinking about actions, organizations and ultimate ends or values with a solid foundation on the science of ecology. Holism is its epistemological principle at the very foundation of this form of rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Established by the so-called Habitat Directive of 1992, see Chap. 6.

References

  • Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954) The distribution and abundance of animals (No. Edn 1). University of Chicago press

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen TF, Hoekstra TW (2015) Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett RV (1986) Ecological rationality: reason and environmental policy. Environ Ethics 8(3):221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Grunewald K, Syrbe R, Walz U, Wende W (2014) Landscape services: the concept and its practical relevance. Landsc Ecol 29(9):1463–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0064-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedoya-Perales N, Pumi G, Mujica A, Talamini E, Domingos Padula A (2018) Quinoa expansion in Peru and its implications for land use management. Sustainability 10(2):532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cary Institute (2018) Our definition of ecology. Available online: https://www.caryinstitute.org/news-insights/definition-ecology

  • Christian RR (2009) Concepts of ecosystem, level and scale. Ecology-Volume I, 34. EOLSS Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner B (1971) The closing circle: man, nature and technology, vol 1, no 97. Knopf, New York, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels RE (1988) The role of ecology in planning: Some misconceptions. Landsc Urban Plan 15 (3–4):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing P (1962). Reason in society: Five types of decisions and their social conditions. Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS (1983) Ecological rationality. Int J Environ Stud 21(1):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS (1987) Rational ecology: the political economy of environmental choice. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020—towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism (Vol. 1). Univ of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig R (2006). Rationality, social sciences and Paul Diesing. Texas A&M University

    Google Scholar 

  • Halada L, Evans D, Romão C, Petersen J-E (2011) Which habitats of European importance depend on agricultural practices?. Biodiver Conserv 20(11):2365–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE, Patten BC, Straškraba M (1992) Ecosystems emerging: toward an ecology of complex systems in a complex future. Ecol Model 62(1–3):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(92)90080-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Piccolo F, Thomas H (2012) Introduction. In: Lo Piccolo F, Thomas H (eds) Ethics and planning research. Routledge, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Liquete C, Braat L, Berry P, Egoh B, Puydarrieux P, Fiorina C, Santos F, Paracchini ML et al (2013) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2779/12398

  • Odum HT (1994) Ecological and general systems: an introduction to systems ecology. Univ. Press of Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1964) Rationality. In: Gould J, Kolb WL (eds) A dictionary of the social sciences. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, pp 573–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1978) Rationality as process and as product of thought. Am Econ Rev 68(2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16(3):284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Rega .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rega, C. (2020). The Concept of Ecological Rationality and Its Application to Spatial Planning. In: Ecological Rationality in Spatial Planning. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33027-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics