Abstract
The objective is to validate the conclusions of a study about the nonlinear behaviour of the asymmetrical RC structural wall systems that was based on the one storey equivalent model time history response. The main instrument of verification is the time history nonlinear response of the full 3D multistorey model. The time history analysis was conducted using Perform 3D software. Three structural types are selected for this study: type I (strong torsionally restrained, Ωθ = 1.4) corresponding to the most common structural wall type structure in Romania; type VI – the central core structure with perimeter frames along one main direction; and type III the central core structure without perimeter frames (Ωθ = 0.3). The parameters which were varied during the study are: (a) stiffness to mass center eccentricity, and (b) q –behavior factor. Nine spectrum compatible accelerograms were used. The seismic characteristics were the ones corresponding to Bucharest. The results were judged in function of two response parameters: (1) R – safety factor, the minimum capacity to demand displacement corresponding to a vertical element and (2) R1 – the drift amplification of the floor extremities due to torsion relative to pure translation. The main conclusions to be validated are:
- 1.
If the substantial decrease of the q behaviour factor accounted for torsionally flexible structures has a significant beneficial effect on the safety factor.
- 2.
If the perimeter frames have a beneficial effect for the behaviour of the central core structure and for the suitability of this type of structure for seismic areas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
CSI (2006) Perform components and elements for perform 3D and perform collapse, computers and structures, Berkeley, CA
EN 1998-1: 2004 Design of structures for earthquake resistance. General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, 45–69
Goel RK, Chopra AK (1990) Inelastic seismic response of one – story, asymmetric – plan systems. College of Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Report No. UBC/EERC – 90/14
Gutunoi A (2014) Aspecte specifice ale răspunsului seismic de torsiune în domeniul neliniar. Dissertation, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest (in Romanian)
Köber D, Zamfirescu D (2009) Simplified methods used for evaluation of the displacement gain due to general torsion. Sci J Math Modell Civil Eng 5(2):32–51
Köber D, Zamfirescu D (2010) Effects of general torsion on structural displacements. In: Proceedings 14 ECEE, Ohrid, Macedonia, ISBN:978-608-65185-1-6
P100-1/2013 Cod de proiectare seismică. Prevederi de proiectare pentru clădiri, 32–61 (in Romanian)
Postelnicu T, Damian I, Zamfirescu D, Morariu E, (2012) Proiectarea structurilor de beton armat în zone seismice, MarLink (in Romanian)
Zamfirescu D (2000a) TORSDIN – program de calcul dinamic neliniar al structurilor cu 3 GLD
Zamfirescu D (2000b) SINEL – program de calcul al spectrelor neliniare de răspuns
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Damian, I., Köber, D., Zamfirescu, D. (2020). Assessment of Global Torsional Sensitivity of Common RC Structural Walls Layout Types. In: Köber, D., De Stefano, M., Zembaty, Z. (eds) Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures III. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33532-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33532-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33531-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33532-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)