Skip to main content

Artificial Neural Networks in Mathematical Mini-Games for Automatic Students’ Learning Styles Identification: A First Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2019 (IDEAL 2019)

Abstract

The lack of customized education results in low performance in different subjects as mathematics. Recognizing and knowing student learning styles will enable educators to create an appropriate learning environment. Questionnaires are traditional methods to identify the learning styles of the students. Nevertheless, they exhibit several limitations such as misunderstanding of the questions and boredom in children. Thus, this work proposes a first automatic approach to detect the learning styles (Activist, Reflector, Theorist, Pragmatist) based on Honey and Mumford theory through the use of Artificial Neural Networks in mathematical Mini-Games. Metrics from the mathematical Mini-Games as score and time were used as input data to then train the Artificial Neural Networks to predict the percentages of learning styles. The data gathered in this work was from a pilot study of Ecuadorian students with ages between 9 and 10 years old. The preliminary results show that the average overall difference between the two techniques (Artificial Neural Networks and CHAEA-Junior) is 4.13%. Finally, we conclude that video games can be fun and suitable tools for an accurate prediction of learning styles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E.: Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review, 1st edn. Learning and Skills Research Centre, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly, D.: Adapting to intelligence profile in an adaptive educational system. Interact. Comput. 18(3), 385–409 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman, J.: Automatic detection of learning styles: state of the art. Artif. Intell. Rev. 44(2), 157–186 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Jia, L., Pai, S.: Identification of learning styles online by observing learners’ browsing behaviour through a neural network. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 36(16), 43–55 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Torres, R., Ríofrio, A., Bustamante, C., Ortega, F.: Prediction of learning improvement in mathematics through a video game using neurocomputational models. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 554–559. SciTePress, Prague (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Latham, A., Crockett, K., Mclean, D.: Profiling student learning styles with multilayer perceptron neural networks. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems. Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2510–2515. IEEE, Manchester (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olguín, J.A.M., García, F.J.C., de la Luz Carrillo González, M., Medina, A.M., Cortés, J.Z.G.: Expert system To Engage CHAEA learning styles, ACRA learning strategies and learning objects into an e-learning platform for higher education students. Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing. LNDECT, vol. 1, pp. 913–922. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49109-7_89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorça, F.A.: Automatic student modeling in adaptive educational systems through probabilistic learning style combinations: a qualitative comparison between two innovative stochastic approaches. J. Braz. Comput. Soc. 19(1), 43–58 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Mumford, A.: Questions and answers on learning styles questionnaire. Ind. Commer. Training 24(7), 10–13 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dziedzic, M., de Oliveira, F.B., Janissek, P.R., Dziedzic, R.M.: Comparing learning styles questionnaire. In: 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 973–978. IEEE, Oklahoma (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sotillo, J.: CHAEA-Junior Survey or how to diagnose elementary and secondary students’ learning styles. J. Learn. Styles 7(1), 182–201 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stash, N., De Bra, P.: Incorporating cognitive styles in AHA! (the adaptive hypermedia architecture). In: Proceedings of the Iasted International Conference Web-Based Education, pp. 378–383. Innsbruck (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang, B.: The influences of an interactive group-based video game: cognitive styles vs. prior ability. Comput. Educ. 88, 399–407 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bontchev, B.: Playing styles based on experiential learning theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 85, 319–328 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Torres, R., Guachi, L., Guachi, R., Stefani, P., Ortega, F.: Learning style identification by CHAEA junior questionnaire and artificial neural network method: a case study. In: 1st International Conference on Advances in Emerging Trends and Technologies. Springer, Quito (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bernard, J.: Learning style identifier: improving the precision of learning style identification through computational intelligence algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 75, 94–108 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivas, A.: Latin America after PISA: Lessons Learned about Education in Seven Countries, 1st edn. CIPPEC-Natura-Instituto Natura, Buenos Aires (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smart Math Labs. https://www.smartmathlabs.com. Accessed 4 July 2019

  19. Aleksieva, A., Petrov, M.: ADOPTA model of learner and educational game structure. In: 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, pp. 636–640. ACM, Vienna (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the directors Msc. Carlos Verdesoto and Arch Marco Lafuente from the schools “Teodoro Gómez de la Torre” and “San Francisco” (Ibarra-Ecuador) who have contributed in the data gathered in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Torres-Molina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Torres-Molina, R., Banda-Almeida, J., Guachi-Guachi, L. (2019). Artificial Neural Networks in Mathematical Mini-Games for Automatic Students’ Learning Styles Identification: A First Approach. In: Yin, H., Camacho, D., Tino, P., Tallón-Ballesteros, A., Menezes, R., Allmendinger, R. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2019. IDEAL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11872. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33617-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33617-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33616-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33617-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics