Skip to main content

Back to the Future: Rethinking Alternatives to External Intervention in African Conflicts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development in Africa
  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

One of the political clichés in Africa today is “African solutions to African problems”. Both African leaders and development partners to Africa talk about it regularly. Paradoxically, this is the age of foreign solutions to many African problems. The normative framework for this external intervention in African conflicts are the Article 1 of the United Nation’s Charter UN Charter, the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, the 2005 “Ezulwini Consensus” of the African Union and the many international protocols and conventions signed by individual African states. All of these authorize the international community to intervene in African conflicts using diplomatic or military strategies. But the implementation of these normative frameworks is problematic to the extent that Africa needs to rethink their utilitarian values. This paper discusses these difficulties, focusing particularly on the questionable NATO intervention in Libya, the debatable role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in African politics and Nigeria’s invitation of the developed world (and not AU or ECOWAS) to deal with the ongoing Boko Haram crisis. My paper argues that the increasing foreign interventions in contemporary African conflicts are caused by the obvious weakness of the African Union and RECs to prevent and manage these problems. The core lesson of the paper is that a sustainable African continent is one in which African leaders take the front seat in managing their conflict issues, and not the one in which they wait for the intervention of outsiders. This is because external intervention in African conflicts are often organized in a manner that compromises the original intentions of R2P, violates state sovereignty in most cases and securitizes African governments and regional organizations. Correcting this problem would require a retooling of the regional peace and security architecture in Africa by empowering actionable “Panels of the wise” at the levels of AU and RECs and strengthening regional standby armies for Chaps. 6, 7 and 8 peace support operations, in addition to pressing for increased democratization of the international system in a way that leads to sincere practice of R2P.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    K. M. Fierke, Diplomatic Interventions: Conflict and Change in Globalizing World (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).

  2. 2.

    James Rosenau, “Intervention as a Scientific Concept,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 13 (2), 1969, p. 153.

  3. 3.

    K. M. Fierke, Diplomatic Interventions: Conflict and Change in Globalizing World (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), p. viii.

  4. 4.

    I. Oppenheim, International Law, vol. 1. (London: Longman, 1905).

  5. 5.

    Patrick M. Regan, “Choosing to Intervene: Outside Interventions in Internal Conflicts,” Journal of Politics 60 (3), 1998, p. 756.

  6. 6.

    Chester Crocker, “Lessons on Intervention,” in Managing Conflict in the Post-Cold War World: The Role of Intervention. Report of the Aspen Institute Conference, August 2–6, 1995 (Aspen, Colorado: Aspen Institute, 1996), pp. 77–88.

  7. 7.

    Chester Crocker, “Lessons on Intervention,” in Managing Conflict in the Post-Cold War World: The Role of Intervention. Report of the Aspen Institute Conference, August 2–6, 1995 (Aspen, Colorado: Aspen Institute, 1996), p. 79.

  8. 8.

    F. Edmead, Analysis and Prediction in International Mediation (New York: UNITAR Study, 1971); O. R. Young, Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967), pp. 19–20; F. S. Northedge and M. D. Donelan, International Disputes: The Political Aspects (London: Europa, 1971).

  9. 9.

    Hudson Meadwell, “A Rational Choice Approach to Political Regionalism,” Comparative Politics 23, 1991, pp. 401–403; Hudson Meadwell, “The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec,” World Politics, 45, 1993, pp. 203–241.

  10. 10.

    Andrew Kohut and Robert Toth, “Managing Conflict in the Post-Cold War World: A Public Perspective,” in Managing Conflict in the Post-Cold War World: The Role of Intervention. Report of the Aspen Institute Conference, August 2–6, 1995 (Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute, 1996), pp. 105–117; Mohamed Sahnoun, “Managing Conflicts in the Post-Cold War Era,” in Managing Conflict in the Post-Cold War World: The Role of Intervention. Report of the Aspen Institute Conference, August 2–6, 1995 (Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute, 1996), pp. 89–96; M. Kaldor and R. Luckham, “Global Transformations and New Conflicts,” IDS Bulletin 32 (2), 2001, pp. 48–59, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.

  11. 11.

    Thandika Mkandawire and Adebayo Olukoshi (Eds.), Between Liberalization and Oppression: The Politics of Structural Adjustment Programme in Africa (Dakar: CODESRIA, 1995).

  12. 12.

    Paul D. Williams, War and Conflict in Africa (London: Polity Press, 2011).

  13. 13.

    Charles Tilly, “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 169–192.

  14. 14.

    Jennifer Giroux, David Lanz and Damiano Sguaitamatti, The Tormented Triangle: The Regionalization of Conflict in Sudan, Chad and Central African Republic, Working Paper No. 47. Regional and Global Axes of Conflict, Center for Security Studies, ETH, and Swiss Peace, April 2009.

  15. 15.

    Naomi Kikoler, “Responsibility to Protect,” Keynote paper presented at the International Conference: ‘Protecting People in Conflict and Crisis: Responding to the Challenges of a Changing World’ organized by the Refugee Studies Centre and Humanitarian Policy Group, September 2009, p. 1.

  16. 16.

    See “The State Parties to Rome Statute,” http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/Pages/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx.

  17. 17.

    African Union, “The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the United Nations: The Ezulwini Consensus,” EX/EX.CL/2 (VII), 7–8 March 2005, Addis Ababa: African Union, p. 6. http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/component/content/article/35-r2pcs-topics/34-african-union-the-ezulwini-consensus.

  18. 18.

    African Union, “The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the United Nations: The Ezulwini Consensus,” EX/EX.CL/2 (VII), 7–8 March 2005, Addis Ababa: African Union, p. 6. http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/component/content/article/35-r2pcs-topics/34-african-union-the-ezulwini-consensus.

  19. 19.

    Bjorn Moller, “The African Union as Security Sector: African Solutions to African Problems,” Crisis States Working Papers Series No. 2. London: Crisis States Research Centre and Development Studies Institute, 2009, p. 1.

  20. 20.

    Isaac Olawale Albert, Pinched, Ditched or Jinxed: The Mantra of African Solutions to African Problems (An Inaugural Lecture, University of Ibadan, Ibadan: University Press, Nigeria, February 3, 2011).

  21. 21.

    O. McDoom, “Rwanda’s Ordinary Killers: Interpreting Popular Participation in the Rwandan Genocide,” Working Paper No. 77. Crisis States Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2005.

  22. 22.

    Dominique Maritz, “Rwanda Genocide: Failure of the International Community,” E-International Relations Students, April 7, 2012, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/04/07/rwandan-genocide-failure-of-the-international-community/.

  23. 23.

    http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/operations/current.shtml.

  24. 24.

    Morlise Simons, “Ex-President of Liberia Aided War Crimes, Court Rules,” The Economist, April 26, 2012.

  25. 25.

    Asim Elhag, “The Sudanese Role in Libya 2011,” http://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/2012/12/17/the-sudanese-role-in-libya-2011/.

  26. 26.

    International Crisis Group (ICG), “Chad: Back towards War?” ICG Africa Report 111, 2006; International Crisis Group (ICG), “Darfur’s New Security Reality,” ICG Africa Report 134, 2007; International Crisis Group (ICG), “Central African Republic: Anatomy of a Phantom State,” ICG Africa Report 136, 2007; Roland Marchal, “The Unseen Regional Implications of the Crisis in Darfur,” in Alex de Waal (Ed.), War in Darfur and the Search for Peace (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2007); Jérôme Tubiana, The Chad-Sudan Proxy War and the ‘Darfurization’ of Chad: Myths and Reality (Geneva: Small Arms Survey, 2008); Jérôme Tubiana, “Land and Power: The Case of the Zaghawa,” at http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/darfur/2008/05/28/land-and-power-the-case-of-the-zaghawa/. Retrieved May 28, 2008.

  27. 27.

    Asim Elhag, “The Sudanese Role in Libya 2011,” http://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/2012/12/17/the-sudanese-role-in-libya-2011/.

  28. 28.

    Isabella Bennett, “Guest Post: AU Failure in Libya? Maybe Not,” The Internationalist, October 21, 2011, http://blogs.cfr.org/patrick/2011/10/21/au-failure-in-libya-maybe-not/.

  29. 29.

    Mwangi S. Kimenyi, “Libya and Ivory Coast Crises Point to Needed Reform of the African Union,” http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/03/31-african-union-kimenyi.

  30. 30.

    Alex Dewaal, “The African Union and the Libya Conflict of 2011,” http://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/2012/12/19/the-african-union-and-the-libya-conflict-of-2011/.

  31. 31.

    George Ayittey, “An African Solution: Solving the Crisis of Failed States,” Harvard International Review, April 14, 2010, http://hir.harvard.edu/refugees/an-african-solution.

  32. 32.

    Esther Pan, “African Peacekeeping Operations,” Council on Foreign Relations, December 2, 2005, http://www.cfr.org/world/african-peacekeeping-operations/p9333#p2.

  33. 33.

    Stephen Budiansky, “Formula for How Many Troops We Need,” Washington Post, May 10, 2004, http://www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?ID=2149. Retrieved September 29, 2008; Steve Bene, “Not Enough Troops in Iraq?,” Washington Monthly, January 9, 2005, http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_01/005422.php. Retrieved September 27, 2008; John S. Brown, “Numerical Considerations in Military Occupations,” Army, April 2006, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3723/is_200604/ai_n17175276/pg_1. Retrieved December 20, 2008; Robert Kagan and William Kristol, “Too Few Troops,” Weekly Standard, 9 (31), April 26, 2004, under “Resolve Alone Won’t Bring Success,” p. 3, http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/977ovnnr.asp?pg=2. Retrieved February 16, 2009; Thomas E. Ricks, Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq (New York: Penguin Press, 2006), pp. 41, 118; Michael R. Gordon and General Bernard E. Trainor, COBRA II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq (New York: Pantheon Books, 2006), pp. 28–29, 45–46, 53, 76–77, 95–98, 119.

  34. 34.

    John Reed, “Mapped: The US Military’s Presence in Africa,” May 1, 2013, http://complex.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/05/01/mapped_the_us_militarys_presence_in_africa_this_spring.

  35. 35.

    Richard Rozoff, “US Drone Warfare Has Become a Global Phenomenon,” Stop NATO: Opposition to Global Militarism, April 9, 2014, http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2014/04/09/audio-u-s-drone-warfare-has-become-a-global-phenomenon/; The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, “US Covert Actions in Somalia,” http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/drones-somalia/.

  36. 36.

    Abdullahi Umar, “Chibok: US Will Not Share Intelligence With Nigeria—Official,” Leadership, May 15, 2014.

  37. 37.

    For the full speech see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/11/obama-ghana-speech-full-t_n_230009.html.

  38. 38.

    For the full speech, see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/11/obama-ghana-speech-full-t_n_230009.html.

  39. 39.

    Institute of Security Studies, Implications of AU decision to give the African Court jurisdiction over international crimes, Paper No. 235, June 2012, www.issafrica.org/uploads/Paper235-AfricaCourt.pdf.

  40. 40.

    Africa Defence Forum, “Exercise Stresses: Police, Civilian Roles in Standby Force,” Africa Defence Forum, vol. 6, Quarter 2 (n.d.), p. 60.

  41. 41.

    Africa Defence Forum, “AU to Create Rapid Reaction Force,” Africa Defence Forum, vol. 6, Quarter 4 (n.d,), p. 60.

Reference

  • Kolzeka, E. (2008). Boots on the Ground: A Historical and Contemporary Analysis of Force Levels for Counterinsurgency Operations. School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Albert, I.O. (2020). Back to the Future: Rethinking Alternatives to External Intervention in African Conflicts. In: Oloruntoba, S., Afolayan, A., Yacob-Haliso, O. (eds) Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34304-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics