Skip to main content

Exploring the Epistemology of Utility Function in Islamic Economics: Foundation of Islamic Finance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Islamic Finance Practices

Abstract

An opinion held by the majority of Muslims scholars, such as Ibn Taymiyyah, supports the contention that each thing or act has an ethical value that can be comprehended through reason. Two different methodologies are used for applying reason onto morals. One is categorical moral reasoning that attempts to locate morality within actions and duties, while the other is consequential moral reasoning which concentrates on the consequences of an act. Jeremy Bentham adopted consequential moral reasoning and developed the concept of utilitarianism, which was further developed by John Stuart Mill. Through utilitarianism, a concept of utility was introduced, measuring the consequences of actions or things. The concept of utility has its roots in the idea of pain and pleasure. By way of comparison, Islam has its own theme for pain and pleasure, which originates from the paradox of maruf (known good) and munkar (known evil). Therefore, the paradigm of utility theory in an Islamic economic model is different to that offered by conventional economics and mainly a utilitarianism approach. In a desire to develop a paraxial economic system, modern Muslim scholarship has spent the last forty years attempting to reconcile and compare the philosophical grounds of conventional political economic ideas. During this process, scholars attempted to develop an understanding of utility within the context of Islamic political economy, however, varied views arose on the relevance of utility within an Islamic economic framework. Some scholars outrightly rejected the idea of utility and considered it incompatible with the spirit of Islam, while others (such as Umar Chapra) tried to reinterpret it in relation to taqwa (piousness). This study attempts to objectively explore the philosophical grounds for incorporating a concept of utility within an Islamic framework by examining maqasid al shariah (the purpose of law); the concepts of development and social justice in Islam; and comparing them with a hermeneutic understanding of tawhidi methodology along with the ontological nature of al-ruh al-tabiiyya (natural forces) and quwwa bahimiyya (animalistic forces). Through this examination, this study attempts to develop foundational arguments for applying an Islamic concept of utility and analyses the relevance of this concept within theories of Islamic political economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    [7:172] (Recall) when your Lord brought forth their progeny from the loins of the children of ‘Adam, and made them testify about themselves (by asking them,). Am I not your Lord?. They said, Of course, You are. We testify. (We did so) lest you should say on the Day of Judgment, We were unaware of this [7:173] or you should say, It was our forefathers who associated partners with Allah, and we were their progeny after them; would you then destroy us on account of what the erroneous did?

  2. 2.

    Furqaan is one of the many names of Qur’an.

  3. 3.

    This Qur’an guides to the most upright Way and gives good news to the believers who do right actions that they will have a large reward (17:9).

  4. 4.

    Verily, We did offer the trust of compliance to the heavens, and the earth, and the mountains and they, being fearful, breach not what is entrusted upon them. Yet man, with his free will, is the only one who breaches this trust of compliance. For, verily, he wrongs himself without knowing it (33:72).

  5. 5.

    For further reading on stages of development within Islam please consult: Nazim Zaman and Mehmet Asutay, 2009. Divergence Between Aspirations and Realities of Islamic Economics: A Political Economy Approach to Bridging the Divide. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 17(1), 73–96.

  6. 6.

    According to hadith, Iman is: “That you affirm Allah, His angels, His books, His messengers, and the Last Day, and that you affirm the Decree, the good of it and the bad of it”.

  7. 7.

    According to hadith, Ihsan is: “That you worship Allah as if you see Him, for if you don’t see Him then truly He sees you”.

  8. 8.

    Sahih Bukhari, Vol 1, Book 1, Hadith No. 1.

  9. 9.

    As for those who believe and do right actions, We will pay them their wages in full. Allah does not love wrongdoers (Quran, 3:57).

  10. 10.

    They denied Our Signs, so Allah seized them for their wrong actions. Allah is fierce in retribution (Quran, 3:11).

  11. 11.

    The metaphor of those who reject their Lord is that their actions are like ashes scattered by strong winds on a stormy day. They have no power at all over anything they have earned. That is extreme misguidance (Quran, 14:18).

  12. 12.

    (Believers say): ‘Our Lord, we heard a caller calling us to faith: “Believe in your Lord!” and we believed. Our Lord, forgive us our wrong actions, erase our bad actions from us and take us back to You with those who are truly good.’ (Quran, 3:193) (His servants are) those who say: ‘Our Lord, we believe, so forgive us our wrong actions and safeguard us from the punishment of the Fire' (Quran, 3:16).

  13. 13.

    But as for those who do evil actions and then subsequently repent and believe, in that case your Lord is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful (Quran, 7:153).

    You who believe! Repent to Allah. It may be that your Lord will erase your bad actions from you and admit you into Gardens (Quran, 66:8).

  14. 14.

    Allah is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful-for certainly all who repent, and act rightly have turned sincerely towards Allah (Quran, 25:70–71).

  15. 15.

    Whoever relies on Allah (has Tawakkul), He is sufficient for him (Quran, 65:3).

  16. 16.

    Then We pardoned you after that so that perhaps you would show thanks (Quran, 2:52).

  17. 17.

    We will recompense the thankful (Quran, 3:145).

  18. 18.

    God does not burden/impose a self except its endurance/capability (Quran, 02:285).

  19. 19.

    Best of all is Allah’s goodly pleasure; that is the grand achievement (Quran, 09:72).

  20. 20.

    People good at the time of ignorance, will remain good after accepting Islam (Sahih al Bukhari: Kitab al Munaqib, 3493).

  21. 21.

    Ye are the best community that hath been raised up for mankind. Ye enjoin right conduct and forbid (Quran, 3:110).

Bibliography

  • Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. I. M. 1990. Al-Ghazzali on Repentance Book Thirty-One of the Revival of the Religious Sciences. Translated from Arabic by Martin S. Stern. Pakistan: Vanguard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, M., Mashayekhi, A., Hicks, R., Rahman, A., and Ravalia, A. 2007. Islamic Finance in UK: Regulation and Challenges. London: Financial Services Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkoun, M. 2002. Islam. In Encyclopaedia of the Quran, Volume 2, edited by J. D. McAuliffe, 565–570. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asutay, M. 2007. A Political Economy Approach to Islamic Economics: Systemic Understanding for an Alternative Economic System. Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies 1(2), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. 1948. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, F. H., and Kearley, T. 2009. Annotated Justinian Code, 2nd edition. Available at http://uwacadweb.uwyo.edu/blume%26justinian/. Access Date 8 September 2017.

  • Bukari, M. B. I. 1999. Sahih al Bukhari: Kitab al Munaqib. Dar-ussalam. Saudi Arabic: Riyaz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., and Higgs, A. C. 1993. Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups. Personnel Psychology 46(4) (Winter), 823–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaghatai, M. I. 2006. Muhammad Asad: Europe’s Gift to Islam, Volume 2. Pakistan: Sang-e-Meel Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapra, M. U. 1992. Islam and the Economics Challenge. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald A. H. 1989. Christianity and Economics: Biblical Foundations. In Economics and Religion, Volume 2, edited by Paul Oslington, 89–179. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, Robert, B. Jr., and Hebert, R. F. 1990. A History of Economics Theory and Methods, 3rd edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, B. 2000. Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying the Connection. PHILO 3(2) (Fall–Winter), 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. M. 2003. Law and Economy in Classical Athens: [Demosthenes] Against Dionysodorus in Athenian Law in Its Democratic Context. In Demos Classical Athenian Democracy: A Consortium for Electronic Publication in the Humanities, edited by L. Adriaan, C. W. Blackwell, A. Mahoney, and A. Scaife. Available at http://www.stoa.org/projects/demos/article_law_economy?page=3&greekEncoding. Access date 11 September 2017.

  • Islahi, A. A. 1988. Economic Concepts of Ibn Taimiyah. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janisch, H. N. 1979. The Regulatory Process of the Canadian Transport Commission. Ottawa: Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannaccone, L. R. 1998. Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI, 1465–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapidus, I. M. 1996. State and Religion in Islamic Societies. Present and Past 151(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander, W. J. 2005. Life and Finite Individuality: The Bosanquet/Pringle-Pattison Debate. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13(1), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, D. L. 1956. Christianity and Economic Problems. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuser, J., and Sonn, T. 1999. Comparing Religion Through Law: Judaism and Islam. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, R. L. 2010. Science Without God: Natural Laws and Christian Beliefs. In When Science and Christianity Meet, edited by C. L. David and L. N. Ronald, 265–287. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl of Wisdom II. Available at http://www.lutonmuslims.co.uk/Pearls2.htm#P25 Access Date 20 May 2016.

  • Regulatory Law 2010. Available at http://www.accesstolaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&view2=listing&id=78. Access Date 5 January 2016.

  • Salvatore, Armando. 2007. The Public Sphere: Liberal Modernity, Catholicism, Islam. New York, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Usmani, M. T. 2007. An Approach to the Quranic Sciences: Uloom-ul-Quran. Pakistan: Darul-Ishaat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, H. W. R. 1949. Quasi-Judicial’ and Its Background. The Cambridge Law Journal 10(2), 216–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wali Allah, S. 1996. The Conclusive Argument from God: Shah Wali Allah of Delhi’s Hujjat Allah al-Baligha. Translated from Arabic by Marcia K. Hermansen. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welngast, B. R. 1995. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics & Organisation 11(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. 2006. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, N. and Asutay, M. 2009. Divergence Between Aspirations and Realities of Islamic Economics: A Political Economy Approach to Bridging the Divide. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 17(1), 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alija Avdukić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khaleel, F., Avdukić, A. (2020). Exploring the Epistemology of Utility Function in Islamic Economics: Foundation of Islamic Finance. In: Efendic, V. (eds) Islamic Finance Practices. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34420-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34420-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34419-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34420-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics