Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: Preparing for a “Transhuman” Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Identity, Institutions and Governance in an AI World

  • 798 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will introduce the main theme of the book—how can humans prepare today for a “transhuman” tomorrow. In particular one where we share the world with a range of new and emerging forms of “smart consciousness”. Questions will be asked such as whether existing perspectives on human relations are sufficient for a coming age where “the internet of everything” is a daily and global reality. Will robots have “human rights”? Will individuals apply for the same jobs as a “conscious” automated employee? Can humans and A.I. learn from each other to create new forms of knowledge and social relations?

The chapter will begin by highlighting the imminent emergence of a “smart world” and what this means. It will then explore the fears and hopes these changes will bring—ranging from dystopian visions of a robot controlled future to utopian hopes of a technologically enlightened society. Following this critical discussion, it will focus on the almost complete lack of thinking (either from academics or policy makers) surrounding the concrete cultural norms, ethical concerns, laws and public administration required to make this an empowering rather than disempowering shift. It will conclude by highlighting the need for humans to fundamentally evolve their thinking, practices and physical existence to meet the challenges and opportunities of this new “smart” revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexandre, L., & Besnier, J. M. (2018). Do Robots Make Love?: From AI to Immortality–Understanding Transhumanism in 12 Questions. Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åsberg, C. (2013). The Timely Ethics of Posthumanist Gender Studies. Feministische Studien, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2013-0103.

  • Åsberg, C., Koobak, R., & Johnson, E. (2011). Beyond the Humanist Imagination. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19(4), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2011.625042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P. (2017). Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, V. S. (2018). The Birth of Consciousness: I Think, Therefore I Am? The Lancet Neurology, 17(5), 402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Editorial Perspective: Neurodiversity – A Revolutionary Concept for Autism and Psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(6), 744–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, F. (2010). Humanism and Transhumanism. The New Atlantis, 29, 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, S., & Jandrić, P. (2017). From Anthropocentric Humanism to Critical Posthumanism in Digital Education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchall, C. (2019). Algorithmic Intelligence? Reconstructing Citizenship Through Digital Methods. Retrieved October 3, 2019, from http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2016/04/12/algorithmic-intelligence-reconstructing-citizenship-through-digital-methods/.

  • Bishop, J. M. (2016). Singularity, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Artificial Intelligence. In Risks of Artificial Intelligence (p. 267).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. (2017). AI: Utopia or Dystopia? Retrieved October 3, 2019, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/02/ai-utopia-or-dystopia/.

  • Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., et al. (2017). Principles of Robotics: Regulating Robots in the Real World. Connection Science, 29(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1271400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2001). What Is Transhumanism? Retrieved October 3, 2019, from https://nickbostrom.com/old/transhumanism.html.

  • Bostrom, N. (2005). A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2008). Letter from Utopia. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1025.

  • Boyte, H. (2017). John Dewey and Citizen Politics: How Democracy Can Survive Artificial Intelligence and the Credo of Efficiency. Education and Culture, 33(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.5703/educationculture.33.2.0013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2018). A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, E. (2016). Techno-Apocalypse. In The Last Midnight: Essays on Apocalyptic Narratives in Millennial Media, 53, 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., & Rappert, B. (2017). Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdett, M. (2014). The Religion of Technology: Transhumanism and the Myth of Progress. In C. Mercer & T. Trothen (Eds.), Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement. Santa Barbara: ABL-CIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, C. (2007). Utopian Aspects of the Debate on Converging Technologies. In G. Banse (Ed.), Assessing Societal Implications of Converging Technological Development (pp. 141–174). Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, C. (2014). Transhumanism and Its Genesis: The Shaping of Human Enhancement Discourse by Visions of the Future. UMANA. MENTE Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7(26), 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P., & Feigenbaum, E. (2014). The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, J. (2015). Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction. London: John Wiley & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, T. (2018, October 2). ‘Keep Robot Brothels Out of Houston’: Sex Doll Company Faces Pushback. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Casino, V. (2016). Social Geographies II. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 846–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515618807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickel, S., & Schrape, J. (2017a). The Logic of Digital Utopianism. Nanoethics, 11(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0285-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickel, S., & Schrape, J. (2017b). The Renaissance of Techno-Utopianism as a Challenge for Responsible Innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 4(2), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1310523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvorsky, G. (2008). Better Living Through Transhumanism. Journal Evolution & Technology, 19(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, F., Paladino, M., & Jetten, J. (2016). Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0338-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. (2017). Beyond AI: Multi-Intelligence (MI) Combining Natural and Artificial Intelligences in Hybrid Beings and Systems. Technologies, 5(3), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstruction of Social Order. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller. (2018). The Posthuman and the Transhuman as Alternative Mappings of the Space of Political Possibility. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.1.2.0151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S., & Lipinska, V. (2014). The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, P. (2012). The Problem of Trans-Humanism in the Light of Philosophy and Theology. In J. Stump & A. Padgett (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity (pp. 393–405). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, D. (2009). Immortality 2.0. The Futurist, 43(1), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraci, R. (2016). A Tale of Two Futures: Techno-Eschatology in the US and India. Social Compass, 63(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768616652332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, K. (2015). Robotics: Countering Singularity Sensationalism. Nature, 526(7573), 320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassie, W. J., & Hansell, G. (2010). H±Transhumanism and Its Critics. Philadelphia: Metanexus Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenwald, O. (2013). The Dystopian Imagination: The Challenge of Techno-Utopia. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 25(1/2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guckelsberger, C., Salge, C., & Colton, S. (2017). Addressing the “Why?” in Computational Creativity: A Non-Anthropocentric, Minimal Model of Intentional Creative Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. (2016). The Age of Em: Work, Love, and Life When Robots Rule the Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. S. (2014). The Myth of Techno-Transcendence: The Rhetoric of the Singularity. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauskeller, M. (2012). Reinventing Cockaigne. Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havlík, V. (2018). The Naturalness of Artificial Intelligence from the Evolutionary Perspective. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0829-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Orallo, J. (2017). The Measure of All Minds: Evaluating Natural and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2010). Contradictions from the Enlightenment Roots of Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 622–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, J., & Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2016). Perfecting Human Futures: Transhuman Visions and Technological Imaginations. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. (2015). Transhumanism. Ethics in Progress, 6(1), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igrek, A. (2015). Beyond Malaise and Euphoria: Herbrechter’s Critical Post-Humanism. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 7(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1179/1757063815z.00000000052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iuga, I. (2016). Transhumanism Between Human Enhancement and Technological Innovation. Symposion, 3(1), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, S. M. (2018). Dystopian Film on the Edge of a Food Coma. New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 16(1), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jotterand, F. (2010). Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status? The American Journal of Bioethics, 10(7), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, T. (2010). Enhancing Who? Enhancing What? Ethics, Bioethics, and Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurie, T. (2015). Becoming-Animal Is a Trap for Humans: Deleuze and Guattari in Madagascar. In H. Stark & J. Roffe (Eds.), Deleuze and the Non/Human (pp. 142–162). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. K. I. (2016). Cyberspace and the Post-Cyberpunk Decentering of Anthropocentrism. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, G. (2015). Social Interaction with Robots: Three Questions. AI & Society, 31(4), 573–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0633-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S. (2017). The Forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revolution: Its Impact on Society and Firms. Futures, 90, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive Technologies: Advances That Will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy. San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, J. (2016). Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, E. (2013). I Sing the Body Dystopic: Utopia and Posthuman Corporeality in PD Jame’s The Children of Men. Ilha Do Desterro, (65), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C., & Trothen, T. (2014). Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement. Santa Barbara: ABL-CIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • More, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (pp. 3–17). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, A. P. (2014). Data at Risk Initiative: Examining and Facilitating the Scientific Process in Relation to Endangered Data. Data Science Journal, 12, 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. (2014). Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kauffman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, C., Lee, T., Kim, Y., Park, S., & Suh, B. (2017). Us vs. Them: Understanding Artificial Intelligence Technophobia Over the Google DeepMind Challenge Match. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornella, A. (2015). Towards a ‘Circuit of Technological Imaginaries’ A Theoretical Approach. In D. Pezzoli-Olgiati (Ed.), Religion in Cultural Imaginary – Explorations in Visual and Material Practices (pp. 9–38). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, F. (2009). The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity. Biosocieties, 4(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1745855209990287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2018). A Networked Self and Human Augmentics, Artificial Intelligence, Sentience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, D. (2010). Insurgent Posthumanism. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(2), 134–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2010). Moral Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. (2005). The Soul of Trans-Humanism. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 44(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-2033.2005.00282.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggiali, L. (2017). Digital Futures and Analogue Pasts? Citizenship and Ethnicity in Techno-Utopian Kenya. Africa, 87(2), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001972016000942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porpora, D. (2017). Dehumanization in Theory: Anti-Humanism, Non-Humanism, Post-Humanism, and Trans-Humanism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2017.1340010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, A. (2009). Eugenic Utopias/Dystopias, Reprogenetics, and Community Genetics. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01160.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. (2016). The Asymmetrical ‘Relationship’: Parallels Between Prostitution and the Development of Sex Robots. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 290–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, M. (2018). Toward a Post-Human Era. Architecture Philosophy, 3(1), 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rus, D. (2015). The Robots Are Coming. Foreign Affairs, 94(4), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, 36(4), 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saage, R. (2013). New Man in Utopian and Transhumanist Perspective. European Journal of Futures Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0014-5.

  • Sauppé, S., & Mutlu, B. (2015). The Social Impact of a Robot Co-Worker in Industrial Settings. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3613–3622): ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, S. (2015). Neurotribes: The Legacy of Autism and the Future of Neurodiversity. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirius, R. U., & Cornell, J. (2015). Transcendence: The Disinformation Encyclopedia of Transhumanism and the Singularity. Red Wheel Weiser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L., & Brooks, R. (2018). The Artificial Life Route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Embodied, Situated Agents. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, T., Yamanda, S., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2015). Influence of Social Avoidance and Distress on People’s Preferences for Robots as Daily Life Communication Partners. In New Friends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. (2017). Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdoux, P. (2009). Transhumanism, Progress and the Future. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 20(2), 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Višňovský, E. (2015). Homo Biotechnologicus. Human Affairs, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0019.

  • Wang, P., Liu, K., & Dougherty, Q. (2018). Conceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Singularity. Information, 9(4), 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What Is Posthumanism? Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, S., & Howard, P. (2016). Automation, Algorithms, and Politics| Political Communication, Computational Propaganda, and Autonomous Agents – Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 10(9). Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6298/1809.

  • Yuen, J. (2018, September 9). ‘NICE SKIN’: What It’s Like Inside a Sex Doll Rental Business. Toronto Sun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Essex, Colchester, UK

    Peter Bloom

Authors
  1. Peter Bloom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Bloom .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bloom, P. (2020). Introduction: Preparing for a “Transhuman” Future. In: Identity, Institutions and Governance in an AI World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36181-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation