Skip to main content

The Ascending Staircase of the Metaphor: From a Rhetorical Device to a Method for Revealing Cognitive Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity (DECON 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1009))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 401 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is concerned with cognitive research advances in a comparative study of the metaphor within educational contexts. By focusing on the role of metaphorical processes in reasoning, we investigate the metaphor over a period of time from 334 B.C. to 2014: specifically, from Aristotle’s seminal rhetorical theory – tradition acknowledges him as the founding father of the metaphor as a research method and as a scientific tool – up to Lakoff and Johnson’s [1] and Gola’s [2] arguments. The pivotal role of metaphor in the evolution of linguistics and neuroscience is represented through three diagrams in a Cartesian reference system, highlighting its ascending staircase paradigm: the undisputed star of many essays and theories, as stated by Eco and Paci [3], either despised or cherished as it happens with any star. The abscissas (i.e., x-axis) and the ordinates (i.e., y-axis) draw the biography of metaphor: since birth, Aristotle describes its embellishment qualities in the linguistic labor limae, but it is even more exalted as a sign of ingeniousness which develops different research perspectives. This paper aims to clarify the development path of the metaphor: until the seventeenth century, after losing its cognitive quality detected in paternal writings, it was diminished as a similitudo brevior, a “will-o’-the-wisp” or sentenced to a sort of “linguistic deceit”. Furthermore, the paper aims to share a theoretical and methodological approach which releases the metaphor from the rhetorical cage where it has been enveloped by some ancient and modern authors of the rhetorical tradition. Indeed, we embrace the idea that metaphor is not merely a part of language, but reflects a primordial part of people’s knowledge and cognition. In so doing, we show who and how has outlined that the pervasiveness of metaphors cannot be overlooked in human understanding and life, although, among the mysteries of human cognition, metaphor remains one of the most baffling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphor We Live. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gola, E.: Metaphor and reasoning: Aristotle’s view revisited. In Ervas F., Sangoi M. (eds.): Isonomia – Epistemologica (5), 25–38 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eco, U., Paci, C.: The scandal of metaphor: metaphorology and semiotics. Poetics Today 4(2), 217–257 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bywater, I. (trans./ed.): Aristotle, On the Art of Poetry. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrilli, S., Welby, V.: Signifying and Understanding: Reading the Works of Victoria Welby and the Signific Movement. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Quintiliano: Institutio Oratoria. Utet, Torino (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, M.: Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Musolff, A.: Ignes fatui or apt similitudes? The apparent denunciation of metaphor by Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Stud. 18(1), 96–112 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vico, G., Bergin, T.G., Fisch, M.H.: The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richards, I.A.: Interpretation in Teaching. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richards, I.A.: The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, New York (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gola, E.: Metafora e mente meccanica. Creatività linguistica e processi cognitivi. Cuec Editrice, Cagliari (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Indurkhya, B.: Metaphor and Cognition - An Interactionist Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, P.C.-H., Cupit, J., Shadbolt, N.: Supporting diagrammatic knowledge acquisition: an ontological analysis of Cartesian graphs. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 54, 457–494 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dirven, R., Frank, R., Pütz, M.: Cognitive Models in Language and Thought - Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings. De Gruyter, Berlin (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Roth, W.-M.: Reading graphs: contributions to an integrative concept of literacy. J. Curriculum Stud. 34(1), 1–24 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Ervas, F., Gola, E., Rossi, M.G.: Metaphors and Emotions as Framing Strategies in Argumentation. EAPCogSci (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gibbs, R. (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Pagani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pagani, C., Paolini, C. (2020). The Ascending Staircase of the Metaphor: From a Rhetorical Device to a Method for Revealing Cognitive Processes. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, SH., Corchado, J. (eds) Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity. DECON 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1009. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38227-8_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics