Skip to main content

Mapping the Professional Self-Concepts of Gallery Owners: A Typology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sociology of Arts and Markets

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Arts ((SOA))

  • 526 Accesses

Abstract

Dealers advocating contemporary art occupy a crucial position in the art world, as they often initiate the processes of reception and commodification of art. Despite the importance of the phenomenon of galleries, little is known about the dispositions and interpretative patterns that structure their owners’ professional practice and enable them to commit to their delicate task. A reconstruction of such concepts was conducted by means of contrasting case studies based on interviews and the biographical data of European and American gallery owners. The contribution outlines a typology of gallery owners active in the global art market: the operator, the companion, the curator-gallerist, and the adviser.

I thank Greg Michael Sax for his meticulous reading of the text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Wuggenig (2007) for a nuanced discussion of the modern art dealer’s role in the early stages of the (relatively autonomous) artistic field. See Bourdieu (1996, 217–221) for the “degree of autonomy of a field of cultural production”.

  2. 2.

    As of 2005, the president of the Art Dealers Association of America ridiculed the denomination: “Frankly, I’m not acquainted with it. I hope anyone calling himself a gallerist has a medical degree.” (The New York Times, 24 December 2005). “Gallerist” omits, as does “gallery owner”, the commercial aspect of the role and emphasises its public function. “Art dealer”, which captures the dual nature of the profession, is still very common in English and denotes gallery owners active both in the primary and the secondary markets. However, “gallerist” is increasingly used – notably by actors who advocate contemporary (“cutting edge”) art – to distinguish innovative gallery owners committed to living artists and pure, that is, secondary market “dealers” (see Sect. 2). This introduction of a new denomination, meant to suggest distance from the commodifying role associated with “dealer”, is similar to an earlier evolution in other languages, such as French and German (Gautier 2019, 37–38; Loichinger 2014).

  3. 3.

    See also Bourdieu (1990, 52–65; 2010 (1977), 72–87).

  4. 4.

    “Even where the experiencing subject believes that ‘insights’ and ‘designs’ come to him from himself alone, ‘inspirationally’ and ‘in a flash’, they nevertheless originate in collective fundamental designs, which are alive in him as well, although he is not self-reflectively conscious of it. It is, however, one of the most important tasks of the sociology of thinking to press on to the level of collective designs – which sustains itself, as it were, behind the individual’s back, not entering into self-reflective consciousness – and to bring out the deeper contextures of discrete individual observations which come about within an age or current” (Mannheim 1986, 51).

  5. 5.

    All translations of quoted German are by M. G.

  6. 6.

    See also Schumpeter (2011b, 241–246).

  7. 7.

    The interviewees’ names have been changed; the country indicates a gallery’s location.

  8. 8.

    See Schultheis et al. (2016), especially pp. 20–23, 54–56 and 247–255, as well as Velthuis and Baia Curioni (2015), pp. 20-23, for an insightful discussion of the artistic field’s expansion and shifting morphology and of the extent and limits of its “globalisation”.

  9. 9.

    “Whereas mere common ‘location’ in a generation is of only potential significance, a generation as an actuality is constituted when similarly ‘located’ contemporaries participate in a common destiny and in the ideas and concepts which are in some way bound up with its unfolding. Within this community of people with a common destiny there can then arise particular generation-units. These are characterized by the fact that they do not merely involve a loose participation by a number of individuals in a pattern of events shared by all alike though interpreted by the different individuals differently, but an identity of responses, a certain affinity in the way in which all move with and are formed by their common experiences” (Mannheim 1952, 306).

References

  • Becker, Howard S. 2008 (1982). Art Worlds, 25th Anniversary Edition, Updated and Expanded. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting, Hans. 2010. Was bitte heisst “contemporary”? Die Zeit, 31 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. Essays on Art and Literature. Edited and introduced by Randal Johnson. New York City: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. The Rules of Art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010 (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Boston: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garz, Detlev, and Uwe Raven. 2015. Theorie der Lebenspraxis. Einführung in das Werk Ulrich Oevermanns. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier, Michael. 2019. Passion und Kalkül. Zur beruflichen Bewährung in der Galerie. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graw, Isabelle. 2015. Art Good, Market Evil? Isabelle Graw on False Polarities and Economic Subtexts. Texte zur Kunst. https://www.textezurkunst.de/articles/art-good-market-evil. Accessed 13 July 2018.

  • Loichinger, Hannes. 2014. Trading Notions. Texte zur Kunst 96: 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl. 1952 (1923). The Problem of Generations. In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, 276–322. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Conservatism. A Contribution to the Sociology of Knowledge. Ed. David Kettler, Volker Meja, and Nico Stehr. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, Raymonde. 1987. The French Art Marke. A Sociological View. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münte, Peter, and Claudia Scheid. 2017. Coping with Crises: A Neo-Classical View on Professions. Professions & Professionalism 7, no 1 (Special Issue: Theoretical Perspectives on Sociology of Professions in Germany): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.1618.

  • Oevermann, Ulrich. 1991. Genetischer Strukturalismus und das sozialwissenschaftliche Problem der Erklärung der Entstehung des Neuen. In Jenseits der Utopie. Theoriekritik der Gegenwart, ed. Stefan Müller-Doohm, 267–335. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handels. In Pädagogische Professionalität. Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns, ed. Arno Combe et al., 70–182. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Der Galerist – Versuch einer soziologischen Strukturanalyse. In Hommage an Horst Appel. Von Avramidis bis Zorio (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 5.12.1997–31.10.1998), 78–85. Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurter Kunstverein.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Die Methode der Fallrekonstruktion in der Grundlagenforschung sowie der klinischen und pädagogischen Praxis. In Die Fallrekonstruktion. Sinnverstehen in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung, ed. Klaus Kraimer, 58–156. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Die Struktur sozialer Deutungsmuster – Versuch einer Aktualisierung. Sozialer Sinn. Zeitschrift für hermeneutische Sozialforschung 1: 35–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1991 (1951). The Social System. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott, and Edward A. Shils, eds. 2008 (1951/1953). Toward a General Theory of Action. Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallberger, Peter. 2002. Unternehmerisches Handeln und Charisma. Eine Fallrekonstruktion (manuscript). Frankfurt am Main: Institut für Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Erosion der Leistungsethik? Fallrekonstruktiv-empirische Befunde am Beispiel von Unternehmensgründern. In Bildung und Beschäftigung. Beiträge der internationalen Konferenz in Bern, ed. Martine Chaponnière et al., 59–74. Zurich and Chur: Rüegger Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultheis, Franz, Erwin Single, Stephan Egger, and Thomas Mazzurana. 2015. When Art Meets Money. Encounters at the Art Basel. Cologne: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultheis, Franz, Erwin Single, Raphaela Köfeler, and Thomas Mazzurana. 2016. Art Unlimited? Dynamics and Paradoxes of a Globalizing Art World. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 2011a (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. In The Entrepreneur. Classic Texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter, ed. Markus C. Becker et al., 79–154. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b (1928). Entrepreneur. In The Entrepreneur. Classic Texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter, ed. Markus C. Becker et al., 227–260. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011c (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. In The Entrepreneur. Classic Texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter, ed. Markus C. Becker et al., 43–78. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein. 2009 (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velthuis, Olav, and Stefano Baia Curioni. 2015. Making Markets Global. In Cosmopolitan Canvases. The Globalization of Markets in Contemporary Art, ed. Olav Velthuis and Stefano Baia Curioni, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1976 (1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The ‘Objectivity’ of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy. In Collected Methodological Writings, ed. Hans Henrik Bruun and Sam Whimster, 100–138. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013 (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernet, Andreas. 2014. Hermeneutics and Objective Hermeneutics. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. Uwe Flick, 234–246. London: Sage Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison C., and Cynthia A. White. 1993 (1965). Canvases and Careers. Institutional Change in the French Painting World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuggenig, Ulf. 2007. The Dealer as a Genius? The Creative Industries Approach and the History of 19th Century Revolutionary Art. Framework – The Finnish Art Review, Issue 6: 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahner, Nina Tessa. 2017. Die Heteronomien des Marktes. Eine Rekonstruktion der Diagnosen zur Ökonomisierung der Kunst. In Autonomie der Kunst? Zur Aktualität eines gesellschaftlichen Leitbildes, ed. Uta Karstein and Nina Tessa Zahner, 139–164. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gautier, M. (2020). Mapping the Professional Self-Concepts of Gallery Owners: A Typology. In: Glauser, A., Holder, P., Mazzurana, T., Moeschler, O., Rolle, V., Schultheis, F. (eds) The Sociology of Arts and Markets. Sociology of the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39013-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39013-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39012-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39013-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics