Skip to main content

Towards a Sociology of Social Compromise: Social Compromise Amongst Victims of Conflict in Northern Ireland, South Africa and Sri Lanka

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Compromises in Democracy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict ((PSCAC))

  • 283 Accesses

Abstract

Compromise refers to mutually acceptable agreements. These can apply to relations between states and in inter-personal social relationships between people. This chapter notes the difference between political and social compromise and proceeds to provide a sociological approach to social compromise in inter-personal relations between people. It advances a sociological theorisation of social compromise, something which the discipline has hitherto neglected, and applies it to understanding the practice of compromise amongst victims of conflict in Northern Ireland, South Africa and Sri Lanka. It argues that the discipline of sociology can help us better understand social compromise, and the chapter sets out a prolegomenon towards the sociology of social compromise, drawing on data from three post-conflict societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The research was funded by the Leverhulme Trust, grant number F/100/152/AK and ran between 2009 and 2015. The methodology is outlined in Brewer et al. (2018a: 4–9). A rigorous sampling procedure was applied to ensure a random sample of victims was obtained unbiased towards socially desirable responses.

Bibliography

  • Archard, D. (2012). Moral Compromise. Philosophy, 87(3), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1989 [1958]). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. (2000). Some Meanings of “the Private” in Sociological Thought. Sociology, 34, 381–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, M. (1990). Splitting the Difference. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. (2004). The Hope Process and Social Inclusion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592, 128–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D. (2003). C. Wright Mills and the Ending of Violence. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D. (2010). Peace Processes: A Sociological Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D. (2011). Dealing with Emotions in Peacemaking. In S. Karstedt, I. Loader, & H. Strang (Eds.), Emotions, Crime and Justice (pp. 295–313). Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D. (2013). Sociology and Peacebuilding. In R. Mac Ginty (Ed.), Handbook of Peacebuilding (pp. 159–170). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D. (2015a). The Limits of Politics in Northern Ireland’s Peace Process. In J. O’Grady, J. Fernando, & C. Higgins (Eds.), Mining Truths: Festschrift in Honour of Geraldine Smyth OP – Ecumenical Theologian and Peacebuilder (pp. 185–202). Emming, Germany: Editions of Sankt Ottilien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D. (2015b). Peace Processes. In J. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 648–653). Oxford: Elseviers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D., Higgins, G. I., & Teeney, F. (2011). Religion, Civil Society and Peace in Northern Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D., Hayes, B. C., Dudgeon, K., Mueller-Hirth, N., Teeney, F., & Wijesinghe, S. L. (2018a). The Sociology of Everyday Life Peacebuilding. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D., Hayes, B. C., & Teeney, F. (2018b). The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2000). The Virtue of Civility. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29, 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connerton, P. (2008). Seven Types of Forgetting. Memory Studies, 1, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahos, P. (2004). Trading in Public Hope. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 592, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (2004). Closing the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1996). In Defence of Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1966). Behaviour in Public Places. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. (2016). Beyond Social Capital. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. C., & Brewer, J. D. (2018). The Road to Compromise in Sri Lanka. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict (pp. 157–178). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2003). The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. (2000). When Is the Personal Political? The President’s Penis and Other Stories, Sociology, 34, 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S. (2002). Emotions and Criminal Justice. Theoretical Criminology, 6, 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingwell, M. (1995). A Civil Tongue. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K., & Makarova, E. (2008). The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space. Sociological Theory, 26, 324–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopora, C. (2012). On Compromise and Being Compromised. Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopora, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2013). On Complicity and Compromise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Weigert, A. (1985a). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Weigert, A. (1985b). Social Atomism, Holism and Trust. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 955–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A. (2010). On Compromise and Rotten Compromises. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (2011). Forgiveness and the Construction of New Conditions for a Common Life. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollering, G. (2001). The Nature of Trust. Sociology, 35, 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Hirth, N. (2018). Forgiveness and the Practice of Compromise in Post-Apartheid South Africa. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict (pp. 103–128). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1993). Practices of Toleration. In J. Lichtenberg (Ed.), Democracy and the Mass Media (pp. 155–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiff, D. (2016). In Praise of Forgetting. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. (1997). The Problem of Trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. (1998). Trust and Sociability. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2003[1974]). The Fall of Public Man. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2018). Barriers to Trust in a “Peace Process Generation”: Ambivalence in Young Catholics in Northern Ireland. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise after Conflict (pp. 75–101). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R. (2002). The Philosophy of Social Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wijesinghe, S. L., & Brewer, J. D. (2018). Peace-Religiosity and Forgiveness Amongst War Victims in Sri Lanka. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict (pp. 129–155). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Brewer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brewer, J.D. (2020). Towards a Sociology of Social Compromise: Social Compromise Amongst Victims of Conflict in Northern Ireland, South Africa and Sri Lanka. In: Baume, S., Novak, S. (eds) Compromises in Democracy. Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40802-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40802-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40801-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40802-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics