Skip to main content

Theories of Teaching and Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
STEM Education for the 21st Century

Abstract

Detailed examples of a variety of theories of learning and course design are described to provide an overview of teaching and learning concepts necessary for more effective STEM education. Examples include Jo Handelsman’s work on Scientific Teaching, and classic theories of learning such as Piaget’s theories of autonomy, Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, Belenky’s theories of learning, and other ideas from social constructivism that can be helpful in STEM education. Multiple taxonomies of learning can be used in STEM subjects to help structure course design, and Bloom’s Taxonomy, the Feisel Schmitz Taxonomy, and the Miller Taxonomy are described along with types of learning outcomes useful for course design. The ideas of Constructive Alignment and Threshold Concepts can help structure active learning pedagogy learning objectives that can unify and animate courses in STEM disciplines, and a review of these theories along with examples is provided. Schulman’s theory of pedagogical content knowledge and its application in STEM courses is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarulel, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2009). Applying constructive alignment to outcomes-based teaching and learning. HEA Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domains. New York: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, K. (2010). Why is geologic time troublesome knowledge? In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 117–130). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. New York: E. J. Kellog & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Education and experience. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F., & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning—Equality and diversity. Oxford: OCSLD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J., & Ingham, H. (1955). The JoHari window, a graphic model of interpersonal awareness. In Proceedings of the Western Training Laboratory in Group Development. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (2011). Ice nucleation by bacteria. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SenJud3cHLc.

  • Mead, J., & Gray, S. (2010). Contexts for threshold concepts (I): A conceptual structure for localizing candidates. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 97–116).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 1—Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning—Ten years on. OCSLD: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Davies, P. (2006). Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 63, S63–S67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. M., Taylor, C., Hughes, C., Kofod, M., Whitaker, N., Lutze-Mann, L., & Tzioumis, V. (2010). Threshold concepts: Challenging the way we think, teach and learn in biology. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 179–192).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIE. (1975). Teaching as clinical information processing. In NIE Conference on Studies in Teaching; Panel 6. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED111807.

  • Palmer, J. A. (2001). Fifty modern thinkers on education (p. 38). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • PCAST. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates. Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541511.

  • Reichard, D., & Takayama, K. (2012). Exploring student learning in unfamiliar territory: A humanist and a scientist compare notes. In K. McKinney (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1996). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, K. (2016). The value of uncertainty in the learning sciences: Intersections of technology and student engagement. In Keynote Address to the 2nd Global Learning Council Symposium, 12–13 April 2016. National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., & Meyer, H. F. (2010). The testable hypothesis as a threshold concept for biology students. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 179–192). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teaching and Learning Laboratory. (2005). Two examples of taxonomies of educational outcomes. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://tll.mit.edu/help/two-examples-taxonomies-educational-objectives.

  • Thomas, L., et al. (2010). Threshold concepts in computer science: An ongoing empirical investigation. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 241–258). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonnegut, K. (1963). Cat’s cradle. New York: Delacourt Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yale University. (2018). Scientific Teaching Summer Institute. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/teaching/stem-education-and-evaluation/summer-institutes-scientific-teaching.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Penprase, B.E. (2020). Theories of Teaching and Learning. In: STEM Education for the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41633-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41633-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41632-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41633-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics