Abstract
‘I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only make them think’ is a proverb from Socrates which is also a very good motto for designing training for a VUCA-world. It is also something that is rather different from the traditional approach to leadership training which continues to support the rather naive idea that there is a knowledge-based solution to every problem, preferably provided by some researcher or external expert. The key issue in facing an unknown future and complex challenges is to realise that there are no ready or simple answers for how to think, or how to take action. From the perspective of learning, listening to lectures does not necessarily open new horizons for thought nor does it generate new kinds of action. In practice, solutions and real changes arise when knowledge, skills and experience are combined in a manner that is different from how this has been done before. This requires bringing knowledge to a personal level and the interactive building of understanding. It also calls for the taking of a step away from the temptation to draw quick conclusions from contradictory opinions or facts and seeing bewilderment as a fruitful condition. Long-term training provides an ideal platform to learn when it is designed in such a way that it develops the ability to think and seek solutions together. When the training is not delivered from an expert position, but instead as an open-ended dialogue with and between the participants, it also creates a great opportunity to practise all the important meta-skills discussed in Chap. 5. In this chapter, we describe in detail how the Route for Renewal© training programme (2016–2018) was designed and conducted in Finland by the Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra. The main aim of the leadership training was to precipitate a systemic change in terms of leadership for the 2020s within the Finnish Central Government. Eight specific learning activities are described in detail, as well as the solutions-focused paradigm of change and facilitation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Warm data laboratory at Sitra Fund, June 2019.
- 2.
The Solutions-Focused (SF) approach originally became attached to organizational change and training via the therapy concept. As therapy, it was developed in the 1950s by Milton H. Erickson and was devised in the mid to late 1980s as part of the interactional brief therapy tradition by Steve de Shazer, Insoo Kim Berg and their colleagues at the Brief Family Therapy Centre in Milwaukee (McKergow and Clarke 2007).
- 3.
We are grateful to the participants for their valuable insights and sincere involvement.
References
Bannik F, Jackson PZ (2011) Positive psychology and solution focus. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 3(1):8–20
Bushe GR (1998) Five theories of change embedded in appreciative inquiry. In: 18th presentation at annual world congress of organization development, Dublin, 14–18 July 1998
Carless D (2007) Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. J Innov Educ Teach Int 44(1):57–66
Cimino JJ Jr (2016) From stone to stone across the unknown sea. Creative Leaps International (available at http://creativeleaps.org/resources/articles, accessed on 30.7.2019)
Clarke J (2006) Turning clients into customers for change—the art of platform building. In: Lueger G, Korn H-P (eds) Solution-focused management. Rainer Hampp Verlag, Berlin, pp 357–362
Clarke J (2012) Memorable workshops: adding variety to our sessions. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 4(1):28–40
Cooperrider D, Whitney D (2006) The change handbook. Appreciative inquiry: a positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, New York
Cotton J (2010) Question utilization in solution-focused brief therapy: a recursive frame analysis of Insoo Kim Berg’s solution talk. Qual Rep 15(1):18–36
Cronen EC, Lang P, Lang S (2009) Circular questions and coordinated management of meaning theory. Human systems. J Ther Consultation Training 20(1):7–34
de Bono E (1985) Six thinking hats. Little Brown and Company, London
Dierolf K (2012) Is SF a systemic approach? Interact J Solution Focus Organ 4(4):10–25
Dweck C (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random house, New York
Graham T (2018) How to design for scale: lessons for ambitious new interventions: many programs are developed with features that make them inherently difficult to scale up. Apolitical. https://apolitical.co/solution_article/how-to-design-for-scale/, accessed on 30.7.2019
Hankovszky K, Hirchburger F, Meier D, Szabó P, von Bidder S (2012) Yet another paradigm shift: some congruent ideas about SF Training. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 4(1):21–27
Harré R (1996) The rediscovery of the human mind. In: Kim (ed) Proceedings of the 50th anniversary conference of the Korean Psychological Association, Psychology dept, Chung-ang University, Seoul, Korea. Available at http://www.massey.ac.nz/~alock/virtual/korea.htm. Accessed on 15.7.2019
Kennedy F, Carroll B, Francoeur F (2013) Mindset not skill set: evaluating in new paradigms of leadership development. In: Advances in developing human resources vol 15, issues 1. SAGE Publications, pp 10–26
Lang PW, Little M, Cronen V (1990) The systemic professional domains of action and the question of neutrality. Hum Syst J Syst Consultation Manag 1(1):39–55
Linley A (2008) From average to A+. Realising strengths in yourself and others. Capp Press, Coventry
Lonka K (2018) Phenomenal learning from Finland. Edita, Helsinki
McKergow M, Bailey H (2014) Host: six new ROLES of engagement for teams, organizations, communities and movements. Solution books, London
McKergow M, Clarke J (2007) Solutions focus working: 80 real life lessons for successful organizational change. Solutions Books, London
Miksits M (2014) Imagining organizational futures: towards a systemic constructionist practice perspective. Professional doctorate thesis on Systemic Practice, University of Bedfordshire, Bedfordshire
Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM (2014) The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science OnlineFirst. Available at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.udel.edu/dist/6/132/files/2010/11/Psychological-Science-2014-Mueller-0956797614524581-1u0h0yu.pdf. Accessed on 5.7.2019
Norling U (2015) The story behind “effects of solutions focused leadership training on productivity and behavior”. J Solution Focus Organ 7(1):44–77
Peschl MF (2007) Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation: Construction processes beyond scientific and rational knowledge. Constructivist Found 2(2–3):136–145
Purokuru V (2016) Taiteen menetelmät kehittämisessä ja tutkimuksessa. Publication of the Committee for the Future of the Parliament of Finland, Helsinki, pp 12–21
Romme AGL, Witteloostuijn A (1999) Circular organizing and triple loop learning. J Organ Change Manag 12(5):439–453
Rosso BD, Dekas KH, Wrzesniewski A (2010) On meaning of work: a theoretical integration and review. Res Organ Behav 30(4):91–127
Salonen M (2015) Systeeminen johtaminen julkisella sektorilla. City of Helsinki, Helsinki
Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross RB, Smith BJ (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Doubleday Verso, New York
Shotter J (2008) Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organ Stud 29(4):501–524
Sitra (2018) Phenomenon-based public administration: discussion paper on reforming the government’s operating practices. Sitra Working paper. Available at www.sitra.fi. Accessed on 4.6.2019
Stenvall J, Virtanen P (2017) Intelligent public organizations? Pub Organ Rev 17(2):195–209
Sundman P, Johansson B (2012) Practical ideas for stimulating quality in training. J Solution Focus Organ 4(1):8–20
Szabó P (2009) Coaching reloaded—assumptions of a brief coach in interaction. J Solution Focus Organ 1(2):26–40
Tammeaid M (2012) Photography—a powerful tool in solution focused use in interaction. J Solution Focus Organ 4(2):41–47
Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A (2018) A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy Soc. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1497933. Accessed on 6.8.2018
Virtanen P, Stenvall J (2018) Intelligent health policy. Theory, concept and practice. Springer, Cham
Visser C, Schlundt Bodien G (2009) Supporting Client’s solutions building and expectations of beneficial change. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 1(2):9–25
Zeig KZ, Muinon MM (1999) Milton H. Erikson. Key figures in counselling and psychotherapy. Sage, p 123
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Virtanen, P., Tammeaid, M. (2020). Learning Leadership by Doing—‘Route for Renewal©’ Case Study. In: Developing Public Sector Leadership. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42311-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42311-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42310-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42311-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)