Skip to main content

Part of the book series: EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing ((EAISICC))

  • 669 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter contains a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the study. The model of research has been presented in the previous chapter, and the measurement variables have been given in this chapter, and data analysis of survey responses to validate and verify the model was conducted. Therefore, the primary purpose of this chapter is to offer a detailed analysis of the data collected from the questionnaire (Likert scale) surveys. The results from data refinement, analysis of multivariate, and testing of hypotheses have been presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Hindawe, J. (1996). Considerations when constructing a semantic differential scale. La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics., 9, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Methodology for business and management. Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 655–690). Heidelberg, Heidelberg/Dordrecht, the Netherlands/London/New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares, statistical strategies for small sample research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Windlhofer, H. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scaling development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1–77. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Christian, M. R., & Marko, S. (2011). PLS-sem: Indeed, a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariant data analysis. Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson International Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. Sinkovics & P. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in international marketing, Vol. 20) (pp. 277–319). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmoller, J. B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(1–2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452

  • Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007). Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, knowledge contribution in online communities. Information Systems Research, 18(1), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York.: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2013). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0. http://www.smartpls.de

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. ISBN 0-321-05677-9. Hardcover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48, 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khan, S.A.R. (2020). Statistical Analyses of Green Supply Chain Management. In: The Critical Success Factors of Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42742-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42742-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42741-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42742-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics