Skip to main content

On the Subellipticity of Some Hypoelliptic Quasihomogeneous Systems of Complex Vector Fields

  • Conference paper
Complex Analysis

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

Abstract

For about twenty five years it was a kind of folk theorem that complex vector-fields defined on Ω × ℝ t (with Ω open set in ℝn) by

$$ L_j = \frac{\partial } {{\partial t_j }} + i\frac{{\partial \phi }} {{\partial t_j }}(t)\frac{\partial } {{\partial x}},j = 1, \ldots ,n, t \in \Omega ,x \in \mathbb{R}, $$

with φ analytic, were subelliptic as soon as they were hypoelliptic. This was indeed the case when n = 1 [Tr1] but in the case n > 1, an inaccurate reading of the proof (based on a non standard subelliptic estimate) given by Maire [Mai1] (see also Trèves [Tr2]) of the hypoellipticity of such systems, under the condition that φ does not admit any local maximum or minimum, was supporting the belief for this folk theorem. This question reappears in the book of [HeNi] in connection with the semi-classical analysis of Witten Laplacians. Quite recently, J.L. Journé and J.M. Trépreau [JoTre] show by explicit examples that there are very simple systems (with polynomial φ’s) which were hypoelliptic but not subelliptic in the standard L 2-sense. But these operators are not quasihomogeneous.

In [De] and [DeHe] the homogeneous and the quasihomogeneous cases were analyzed in dimension 2. Large classes of systems for which subellipticiity can be proved were exhibited. We will show in this paper how a new idea for the construction of escaping rays permits to show that in the analytic case all the quasihomogeneous hypoelliptic systems in the class above considered by Maire are effectively subelliptic in the 2-dimensional case. The analysis presented here is a continuation of two previous works by the first author for the homogeneous case [De] and the two authors for the quasihomogeneous case [DeHe].

In honor of Linda P. Rothschild

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.S. Baouendi and F. Trèves. A microlocal version of Bochner’s tube theorem. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 31 (6), pp. 885–895 (1982).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bove, M. Derridj, J. Kohn and D. Tartakoff. Sum of squares of complex vector fields and (analytic)-hypoellipticity. Math. Res. Lett. 13 (5), pp. 683–702 (2006).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P.D. Cordaro and J.G. Hounie. Local solvability for a class of differential complexes. Acta Math. 197, pp. 191–212 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Derridj. Subelliptic estimates for some systems of complex vector fields. In “Hyperbolic problems and regularity questions”. Series Trends in Mathematics. Eds.: M. Padula and L. Zanghirati. Birkhäuser (2006), pp. 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Derridj and B. Helffer. Subelliptic estimates for some systems of complex vector fields: quasihomogeneous case. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (2009), no. 5, pp. 2607–2630

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Helffer and F. Nier. Hypoelliptic estimates and spectral theory for Fokker-Planck operators and Witten Laplacians. Lecture Notes in Math. 1862, Springer Verlag, Berlin 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Helffer and J. Nourrigat. Hypoellipticité maximale pour des opérateurs polynômes de champs de vecteur. Progress in Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Vol. 58 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Hörmander. Hypoelliptic second-order differential equations. Acta Mathematica 119 (1967), pp. 147–171.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Hörmander. Subelliptic operators. Seminar on singularities of solutions of partial differential equations. Ann. Math. Studies 91 (1978), pp. 127–208.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.L. Journé and J.M. Trépreau. Hypoellipticité sans sous-ellipticité: le cas des systèmes de n champs de vecteurs complexes en (n + 1)-variables. Séminaire EDP in Ecole Polytechnique, April 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kohn. Lectures on degenerate elliptic problems. Pseudodifferential operators with applications, C.I.M.E., Bressanone 1977, pp. 89–151 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.J. Kohn. Hypoellipticity and loss of derivatives, with an appendix by M. Derridj and D. Tartakoff. Ann. of Math. 162 (2), pp. 943–986 (2005).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. H.M. Maire. Hypoelliptic overdetermined systems of partial differential equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 5 (4), pp. 331–380 (1980).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. H.M. Maire. Résolubilité et hypoellipticité de systèmes surdéterminés. Séminaire Goulaouic-Schwartz 1979–1980, Exp. V, Ecole Polytechnique (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.M. Maire. Necessary and sufficient condition for maximal hypoellipticity of \( \bar \partial _b \). Unpublished (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.M. Maire. Régularité optimale des solutions de systèmes différentiels et du Laplacien associé: application au □b. Math. Ann. 258, pp. 55–63 (1981).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Nier. Hypoellipticity for Fokker-Planck operators and Witten Laplacians. Course in China. Preprint September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Nourrigat. Subelliptic estimates for systems of pseudo-differential operators. Course in Recife (1982). University of Recife.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Nourrigat. Systèmes sous-elliptiques. Séminaire Equations aux Dérivées Partielles, 1986-1987, exposé V, Ecole Polytechnique (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Nourrigat. Subelliptic systems II. Inv. Math. 104 (2) (1991), pp. 377–400.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Trèves. A new method of proof of the subelliptic estimates. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 24 (1971), pp. 71–115.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Trèves. Study of a model in the theory of complexes of pseudo-differential operators. Ann. of Math. (2) 104, pp. 269–324 (1976). See also erratum: Ann. of Math. (2) 113, p. 423 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Basel AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Derridj, M., Helffer, B. (2010). On the Subellipticity of Some Hypoelliptic Quasihomogeneous Systems of Complex Vector Fields. In: Complex Analysis. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0009-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics